diff mbox series

RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE

Message ID 20230830095134.3571077-1-lehua.ding@rivai.ai
State Unresolved
Headers
Series RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patch-check warning Git am fail log

Commit Message

Lehua Ding Aug. 30, 2023, 9:51 a.m. UTC 
  This patch fix pr111234 (a vsetvl pass ICE) when fuse a mask any
vlmax vsetvl_vtype_change_only insn with a mu vsetvl insn.

	PR target/111234

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (gen_vsetvl_pat): Remove condition.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c: New test.

---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc              |  2 +-
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c

Comments

juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai Aug. 31, 2023, 12:07 a.m. UTC | #1 
Ok for trunk. But not sure whether it's ok for GCC-13.



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Lehua Ding
Date: 2023-08-30 17:51
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; palmer; jeffreyalaw
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE
This patch fix pr111234 (a vsetvl pass ICE) when fuse a mask any
vlmax vsetvl_vtype_change_only insn with a mu vsetvl insn.
 
PR target/111234
 
gcc/ChangeLog:
 
* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (gen_vsetvl_pat): Remove condition.
 
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
 
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c: New test.
 
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc              |  2 +-
.../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
index 1386d9250ca..a81bb53a521 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ gen_vsetvl_pat (rtx_insn *rinsn, const vector_insn_info &info,
     new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, vl);
   else
     {
-      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn) || vlmax_avl_p (info.get_avl ()))
+      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn))
new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, get_vl (rinsn));
       else if (INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvl_vtype_change_only)
new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_VTYPE_CHANGE_ONLY, new_info, NULL_RTX);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ee5eec4a257
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3" } */
+
+#include <riscv_vector.h>
+
+void
+f (vint32m1_t *in, vint64m2_t *out, vbool32_t *m, int b)
+{
+  vint32m1_t va = *in;
+  vbool32_t mask = *m;
+  vint64m2_t vb
+    = __riscv_vwadd_vx_i64m2_m (mask, va, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
+  vint64m2_t vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2 (vb, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
+
+  if (b != 0)
+    vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2_mu (mask, vc, vc, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
+
+  *out = vc;
+}
-- 
2.36.3
Kito Cheng Aug. 31, 2023, 1:44 a.m. UTC | #2 
OK for gcc 13 branch too, the general rule for backport is to wait one
week on trunk to make sure the fix is stable.


On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:08 AM juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
<juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> Ok for trunk. But not sure whether it's ok for GCC-13.
>
>
>
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>
> From: Lehua Ding
> Date: 2023-08-30 17:51
> To: gcc-patches
> CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; palmer; jeffreyalaw
> Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE
> This patch fix pr111234 (a vsetvl pass ICE) when fuse a mask any
> vlmax vsetvl_vtype_change_only insn with a mu vsetvl insn.
>
> PR target/111234
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (gen_vsetvl_pat): Remove condition.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c: New test.
>
> ---
> gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc              |  2 +-
> .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> index 1386d9250ca..a81bb53a521 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ gen_vsetvl_pat (rtx_insn *rinsn, const vector_insn_info &info,
>      new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, vl);
>    else
>      {
> -      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn) || vlmax_avl_p (info.get_avl ()))
> +      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn))
> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, get_vl (rinsn));
>        else if (INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvl_vtype_change_only)
> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_VTYPE_CHANGE_ONLY, new_info, NULL_RTX);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..ee5eec4a257
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3" } */
> +
> +#include <riscv_vector.h>
> +
> +void
> +f (vint32m1_t *in, vint64m2_t *out, vbool32_t *m, int b)
> +{
> +  vint32m1_t va = *in;
> +  vbool32_t mask = *m;
> +  vint64m2_t vb
> +    = __riscv_vwadd_vx_i64m2_m (mask, va, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
> +  vint64m2_t vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2 (vb, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
> +
> +  if (b != 0)
> +    vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2_mu (mask, vc, vc, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
> +
> +  *out = vc;
> +}
> --
> 2.36.3
>
Lehua Ding Aug. 31, 2023, 2:12 a.m. UTC | #3 
Committed to the trunk and backported to GCC 13 one week later.
Thanks Juzhe and Kito.

On 2023/8/31 9:44, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
> OK for gcc 13 branch too, the general rule for backport is to wait one
> week on trunk to make sure the fix is stable.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:08 AM juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
> <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
>>
>> Ok for trunk. But not sure whether it's ok for GCC-13.
>>
>>
>>
>> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>>
>> From: Lehua Ding
>> Date: 2023-08-30 17:51
>> To: gcc-patches
>> CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; palmer; jeffreyalaw
>> Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE
>> This patch fix pr111234 (a vsetvl pass ICE) when fuse a mask any
>> vlmax vsetvl_vtype_change_only insn with a mu vsetvl insn.
>>
>> PR target/111234
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (gen_vsetvl_pat): Remove condition.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c: New test.
>>
>> ---
>> gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc              |  2 +-
>> .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
>> index 1386d9250ca..a81bb53a521 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
>> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ gen_vsetvl_pat (rtx_insn *rinsn, const vector_insn_info &info,
>>       new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, vl);
>>     else
>>       {
>> -      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn) || vlmax_avl_p (info.get_avl ()))
>> +      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn))
>> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, get_vl (rinsn));
>>         else if (INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvl_vtype_change_only)
>> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_VTYPE_CHANGE_ONLY, new_info, NULL_RTX);
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..ee5eec4a257
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3" } */
>> +
>> +#include <riscv_vector.h>
>> +
>> +void
>> +f (vint32m1_t *in, vint64m2_t *out, vbool32_t *m, int b)
>> +{
>> +  vint32m1_t va = *in;
>> +  vbool32_t mask = *m;
>> +  vint64m2_t vb
>> +    = __riscv_vwadd_vx_i64m2_m (mask, va, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
>> +  vint64m2_t vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2 (vb, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
>> +
>> +  if (b != 0)
>> +    vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2_mu (mask, vc, vc, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
>> +
>> +  *out = vc;
>> +}
>> --
>> 2.36.3
>>
Lehua Ding Sept. 18, 2023, 7:54 a.m. UTC | #4 
Hi Kito,

Can this bugfix be backported to GCC 13 now? If so, how can I do it?

On 2023/8/31 10:12, Lehua Ding wrote:
> Committed to the trunk and backported to GCC 13 one week later.
> Thanks Juzhe and Kito.
> 
> On 2023/8/31 9:44, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> OK for gcc 13 branch too, the general rule for backport is to wait one
>> week on trunk to make sure the fix is stable.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:08 AM juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>> <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
>>>
>>> Ok for trunk. But not sure whether it's ok for GCC-13.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>>>
>>> From: Lehua Ding
>>> Date: 2023-08-30 17:51
>>> To: gcc-patches
>>> CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; palmer; jeffreyalaw
>>> Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE
>>> This patch fix pr111234 (a vsetvl pass ICE) when fuse a mask any
>>> vlmax vsetvl_vtype_change_only insn with a mu vsetvl insn.
>>>
>>> PR target/111234
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (gen_vsetvl_pat): Remove condition.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c: New test.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc              |  2 +-
>>> .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc 
>>> b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
>>> index 1386d9250ca..a81bb53a521 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
>>> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ gen_vsetvl_pat (rtx_insn *rinsn, const 
>>> vector_insn_info &info,
>>>       new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, vl);
>>>     else
>>>       {
>>> -      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn) || vlmax_avl_p (info.get_avl ()))
>>> +      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn))
>>> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, get_vl (rinsn));
>>>         else if (INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvl_vtype_change_only)
>>> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_VTYPE_CHANGE_ONLY, new_info, NULL_RTX);
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c 
>>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..ee5eec4a257
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
>>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>>> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3" } */
>>> +
>>> +#include <riscv_vector.h>
>>> +
>>> +void
>>> +f (vint32m1_t *in, vint64m2_t *out, vbool32_t *m, int b)
>>> +{
>>> +  vint32m1_t va = *in;
>>> +  vbool32_t mask = *m;
>>> +  vint64m2_t vb
>>> +    = __riscv_vwadd_vx_i64m2_m (mask, va, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 
>>> ());
>>> +  vint64m2_t vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2 (vb, 1, 
>>> __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
>>> +
>>> +  if (b != 0)
>>> +    vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2_mu (mask, vc, vc, 1, 
>>> __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
>>> +
>>> +  *out = vc;
>>> +}
>>> -- 
>>> 2.36.3
>>>
>
Kito Cheng Sept. 18, 2023, 8:08 a.m. UTC | #5 
OK for backport now, steps for backport:
- checkout to releases/gcc-13 branch
- ./contrib/git-backport.py <hash-in-trunk>
- Make sure everything is alright, build-able, no extra regression.
- push releases/gcc-13 branch!

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 3:54 PM Lehua Ding <lehua.ding@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> Hi Kito,
>
> Can this bugfix be backported to GCC 13 now? If so, how can I do it?
>
> On 2023/8/31 10:12, Lehua Ding wrote:
> > Committed to the trunk and backported to GCC 13 one week later.
> > Thanks Juzhe and Kito.
> >
> > On 2023/8/31 9:44, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> OK for gcc 13 branch too, the general rule for backport is to wait one
> >> week on trunk to make sure the fix is stable.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:08 AM juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
> >> <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok for trunk. But not sure whether it's ok for GCC-13.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
> >>>
> >>> From: Lehua Ding
> >>> Date: 2023-08-30 17:51
> >>> To: gcc-patches
> >>> CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc; palmer; jeffreyalaw
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix vsetvl pass ICE
> >>> This patch fix pr111234 (a vsetvl pass ICE) when fuse a mask any
> >>> vlmax vsetvl_vtype_change_only insn with a mu vsetvl insn.
> >>>
> >>> PR target/111234
> >>>
> >>> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>> * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (gen_vsetvl_pat): Remove condition.
> >>>
> >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >>>
> >>> * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c: New test.
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc              |  2 +-
> >>> .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> >>> b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> >>> index 1386d9250ca..a81bb53a521 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> >>> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
> >>> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ gen_vsetvl_pat (rtx_insn *rinsn, const
> >>> vector_insn_info &info,
> >>>       new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, vl);
> >>>     else
> >>>       {
> >>> -      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn) || vlmax_avl_p (info.get_avl ()))
> >>> +      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn))
> >>> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, get_vl (rinsn));
> >>>         else if (INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvl_vtype_change_only)
> >>> new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_VTYPE_CHANGE_ONLY, new_info, NULL_RTX);
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
> >>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 00000000000..ee5eec4a257
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> >>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> >>> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3" } */
> >>> +
> >>> +#include <riscv_vector.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +void
> >>> +f (vint32m1_t *in, vint64m2_t *out, vbool32_t *m, int b)
> >>> +{
> >>> +  vint32m1_t va = *in;
> >>> +  vbool32_t mask = *m;
> >>> +  vint64m2_t vb
> >>> +    = __riscv_vwadd_vx_i64m2_m (mask, va, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2
> >>> ());
> >>> +  vint64m2_t vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2 (vb, 1,
> >>> __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
> >>> +
> >>> +  if (b != 0)
> >>> +    vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2_mu (mask, vc, vc, 1,
> >>> __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
> >>> +
> >>> +  *out = vc;
> >>> +}
> >>> --
> >>> 2.36.3
> >>>
> >
>
> --
> Best,
> Lehua
>
Lehua Ding Sept. 18, 2023, 8:22 a.m. UTC | #6 
Hi Kito,

On 2023/9/18 16:08, Kito Cheng wrote:
> - ./contrib/git-backport.py <hash-in-trunk>

This step fails because of conflicts. So am I should send another patch 
based on the GCC 13 code?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
index 1386d9250ca..a81bb53a521 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@  gen_vsetvl_pat (rtx_insn *rinsn, const vector_insn_info &info,
     new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, vl);
   else
     {
-      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn) || vlmax_avl_p (info.get_avl ()))
+      if (vsetvl_insn_p (rinsn))
 	new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_NORMAL, new_info, get_vl (rinsn));
       else if (INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvl_vtype_change_only)
 	new_pat = gen_vsetvl_pat (VSETVL_VTYPE_CHANGE_ONLY, new_info, NULL_RTX);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ee5eec4a257
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/vsetvl/pr111234.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ 
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O3" } */
+
+#include <riscv_vector.h>
+
+void
+f (vint32m1_t *in, vint64m2_t *out, vbool32_t *m, int b)
+{
+  vint32m1_t va = *in;
+  vbool32_t mask = *m;
+  vint64m2_t vb
+    = __riscv_vwadd_vx_i64m2_m (mask, va, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
+  vint64m2_t vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2 (vb, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
+
+  if (b != 0)
+    vc = __riscv_vadd_vx_i64m2_mu (mask, vc, vc, 1, __riscv_vsetvlmax_e64m2 ());
+
+  *out = vc;
+}