From patchwork Wed Feb 7 11:12:56 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Smita Koralahalli X-Patchwork-Id: 197854 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7301:168b:b0:106:860b:bbdd with SMTP id ma11csp2152433dyb; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 03:13:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEmtyqYbRjn4CTJ6x61/uWqSVrpqyq7GmvsjrQfu8uK9eYBDRRYW55xgDyzWO97UlLg4+js X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:12cf:b0:560:64e2:98a5 with SMTP id k15-20020a05640212cf00b0056064e298a5mr2946086edx.21.1707304415612; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:13:35 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCXT0ChXptJaOyW+JXiLScOdIbhTHkhsPQ4Ys8IxWq0It+X/cSkrKju53eRGVp28iJEz+BzlGQdRkKaUNx5aCDL17U6p4g== Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s6-20020a05640217c600b00560bd0ef0cdsi742729edy.272.2024.02.07.03.13.35 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:13:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-56365-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amd.com header.s=selector1 header.b=sR2cXY2u; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-56365-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-56365-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amd.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6791F27878 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58B11B7E3; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b="sR2cXY2u" Received: from NAM04-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam04on2078.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.100.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 277741B7E1; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.100.78 ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707304396; cv=fail; b=E2DNI/17BjzTRFhjI1qXDJsjRYcz7VWS1Fw8SKgbNY8kJATTt+CxcheZ7Kfb5MTuvwBsdOAZxLghxxN6OBF2HCmg0rks3rjUp8cuRPCbDKH/DP1dU8rsgQNZyFPG3YKrsyR1Nsy2bDJuHdkKbM7rCCFWTpf9K55iFIecTWVxtFU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707304396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GkOmwpKTrnp7IuYuSHvW2+DLbN8hAieO1D6SOAdMlss=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dgGusQPuQtl0t9gPiG/Vv2rLaWlU7D7LE6ofzsoA0lyBbPzdwH04WDz2g+88Ma9cgEu2uyFWtkl1F1jSbMpYNcY/pZWySxE1KuKut+kaKh19avlYMgiG/hd7vtzHvU/e1tjwUMCqb76/ZPMctY1sWFO/J32lRCtZT0UM15cmSss= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b=sR2cXY2u; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.100.78 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DfxM/EOiyxQtASMFllNdmOQJRQJVJ2aGAO2AZug5IoPOEXYYcYF7qqVB9WRdC6NFmsuhdy6ZtpalIJONuuSBOidjcPuLuMps+cZwuFP/wcxJdeaMbACTbIhDAt1PlGSFda2QD4pH0zNln4mahQCY1AXlAVO/p4yuuZQ1yRMgtZBpD18LFxzoCyV3wyaDqq5yaYizVRZf5bMm4OoT/9I5qJvZonGjc5plW/TAHsSphdp2w5awGocTQp3L8ZCzmPs9iBDSHFlwkFYaSGW0eecd7wqOXjrK2UAlGwfgIKZQx+zXG53lJ7hsgUdGMzp8kr3co4GJp94wyl/ssVoLFAdZzw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Zi+Fj5XDjm86f+qa5tirUM+/QboG7lc5D7g0Hzd9O3Y=; b=iw+qiiR6e4wRXyKmrZIwcPtsIsuPugLIFLVk5FQaYk53ldWconJf0RL/CRD3DXTLayYCYoug3e9VHo23rt8IQCDzqTneNHkyaUYivP9UMh3lXwgulyp/iVt6X1xZX7I3Wtb6yXx6SJFuUxC0fBnbvdHnPOx7TUXAkmPMjKIEubQqN834H3s5Aj2U+AYAb2e8oarzZLkmgBqjU/39jznJtFLgHGvWMKwKWBlhGCj3SlOJ0jtBzwVFosb331BwARp9alg28m0brm4YVQTbRcYt6hFWrk0VOjhwgvpDAEOFZpmkA5/cce8J/YWrHHO/zyVb4Aw7O4b28kRNLH54Xxi3eA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=vger.kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Zi+Fj5XDjm86f+qa5tirUM+/QboG7lc5D7g0Hzd9O3Y=; b=sR2cXY2uN6xlaMJqt9ly9hZ4QBK1uOzzpM9y3YpmeXSOaF7Q0W9qCj5JHEaRKRfoqapb8uSgA1wTw4QD+Qa8i48iHGwCy16atykG3FII7WNmqcVXYuAgtsgK4uYYEFkMTwm16k1L/YCpW3fGQxCi3efq/IVuNiSir5HDWE2RV5M= Received: from MN2PR16CA0020.namprd16.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:134::33) by SA1PR12MB7174.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:2b1::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7270.14; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:13:09 +0000 Received: from BL6PEPF0001AB4E.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:134:cafe::8f) by MN2PR16CA0020.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:208:134::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7249.36 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:13:09 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BL6PEPF0001AB4E.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.7249.19 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:13:09 +0000 Received: from ethanolx50f7host.amd.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.34; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 05:13:08 -0600 From: Smita Koralahalli To: , CC: Bjorn Helgaas , Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Lukas Wunner , Yazen Ghannam , Ilpo Jarvinen Subject: [PATCH v8] PCI/DPC: Ignore Surprise Down error on hot removal Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:12:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20240207111256.110982-1-Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BL6PEPF0001AB4E:EE_|SA1PR12MB7174:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 9e3196e6-cf17-4f03-182d-08dc27cdc411 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: PYdHgc2/KlJH3jtJWrTHqaAuxlHO50XsTu8pE4+IMyExzmSnaN0nxrvnz8BFlwBLVocIqtDBqcZUv57d1kofkFvnFMhePGt8zAh/1urRq4DNYzaD381O8Exnj+NtdMyR4j3NnW/lU9IcS6ZI/kC6JAgNZCd/prUgLdJcJgj4RkKhDzzkyhMvNX9olf7vmZKlxI2qEHIdidwnI4VJSEA+Hwc44fyyudo3F9DC6yKQRNav4gGQJdRbQC4ddGksCTgf2O4Gz4+sWvdsGbPw9+sLCZjNTFiQMpJR65WT91ZR7JhdTIR07Kn9oExKkf/Vv/B+4Pxq2ehtPw3LhfSXd/F6B/cieR6CqJu13ifr4Bklm/9j9oSmRl0m2CLwdHOSxe+ecwVhfaFz2h35uuLjhziZnGR3T17tW40bgJy6/4Iwe02Nv4VbdrOwGkChM3HKmQVtnrjAqoUzkc75Mcl+lIdSw4ms7iC3YWNJYBqUx1yFiUBjoi2xI5Rbd/mBkC8Qbg2ub2NIUgICFspO5ViIP4HOpRLtGHQPaZ4kqMbQCol///ZwsZLAmUmNdRRTqLpvzW6SvP8xUJIPd8+sYsmgy7Yyzej3dUL1iavkmBmQCDOI0GAaRyDdlaVzcK9Lx93AjzqmloNQp6HwBhfdddO6+sdroTuDdwDG30bXCD9SdAVbinECYM3efbwQbqlhq9PFC27Oduf5oKhO20cjIp1HaL/MMj1gHUbobIBETeFziwPRaAOJbs5O8YqSSrFd+CSeY2NhgZx5OvyOoo/JxwCyHuiYRg== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(230922051799003)(64100799003)(186009)(82310400011)(451199024)(1800799012)(40470700004)(36840700001)(46966006)(478600001)(86362001)(41300700001)(966005)(82740400003)(36860700001)(83380400001)(356005)(81166007)(40460700003)(40480700001)(47076005)(336012)(426003)(26005)(8676002)(6666004)(316002)(7696005)(4326008)(16526019)(5660300002)(8936002)(54906003)(70206006)(110136005)(36756003)(70586007)(2906002)(1076003)(2616005)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2024 11:13:09.0531 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 9e3196e6-cf17-4f03-182d-08dc27cdc411 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL6PEPF0001AB4E.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA1PR12MB7174 X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1790238434647777428 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1790238434647777428 According to PCIe r6.0 sec 6.7.6 [1], async removal with DPC may result in surprise down error. This error is expected and is just a side-effect of async remove. Ignore surprise down error generated as a side-effect of async remove. Typically, this error is benign as the pciehp handler invoked by PDC or/and DLLSC alongside DPC, de-enumerates and brings down the device appropriately. But the error messages might confuse users. Get rid of these irritating log messages with a 1s delay while pciehp waits for dpc recovery. The implementation is as follows: On an async remove a DPC is triggered along with a Presence Detect State change and/or DLL State Change. Determine it's an async remove by checking for DPC Trigger Status in DPC Status Register and Surprise Down Error Status in AER Uncorrected Error Status to be non-zero. If true, treat the DPC event as a side-effect of async remove, clear the error status registers and continue with hot-plug tear down routines. If not, follow the existing routine to handle AER and DPC errors. Please note that, masking Surprise Down Errors was explored as an alternative approach, but left due to the odd behavior that masking only avoids the interrupt, but still records an error per PCIe r6.0.1 Section 6.2.3.2.2. That stale error is going to be reported the next time some error other than Surprise Down is handled. Dmesg before: pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: containment event, status:0x1f01 source:0x0000 pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: unmasked uncorrectable error detected pcieport 0000:00:01.4: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Receiver ID) pcieport 0000:00:01.4: device [1022:14ab] error status/mask=00000020/04004000 pcieport 0000:00:01.4: [ 5] SDES (First) nvme nvme2: frozen state error detected, reset controller pcieport 0000:00:01.4: DPC: Data Link Layer Link Active not set in 1000 msec pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: subordinate device reset failed pcieport 0000:00:01.4: AER: device recovery failed pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down nvme2n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0 pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 49 Dmesg after: pcieport 0000:00:01.4: pciehp: Slot(16): Link Down nvme1n1: detected capacity change from 1953525168 to 0 pci 0000:04:00.0: Removing from iommu group 37 [1] PCI Express Base Specification Revision 6.0, Dec 16 2021. https://members.pcisig.com/wg/PCI-SIG/document/16609 Signed-off-by: Smita Koralahalli Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan --- v2: Indentation is taken care. (Bjorn) Unrelevant dmesg logs are removed. (Bjorn) Rephrased commit message, to be clear on native vs FW-First handling. (Bjorn and Sathyanarayanan) Prefix changed from pciehp_ to dpc_. (Lukas) Clearing ARI and AtomicOp Requester are performed as a part of (de-)enumeration in pciehp_unconfigure_device(). (Lukas) Changed to clearing all optional capabilities in DEVCTL2. OS-First -> native. (Sathyanarayanan) v3: Added error message when root port become inactive. Modified commit description to add more details. Rearranged code comments and function calls with no functional change. Additional check for is_hotplug_bridge. dpc_completed_waitqueue to wakeup pciehp handler. Cleared only Fatal error detected in DEVSTA. v4: Made read+write conditional on "if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions)" for DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS. Wrapped to 80 chars. Code comment for clearing PCI_STATUS and PCI_EXP_DEVSTA. Added pcie_wait_for_link() check. Removed error message for root port inactive as the message already existed. Check for is_hotplug_bridge before registers read. Section 6.7.6 of the PCIe Base Spec 6.0 -> PCIe r6.0 sec 6.7.6. Made code comment more meaningful. v5: $SUBJECT correction. Added "Reviewed-by" tag. No code changes. Re-spin on latest base to get Bjorn's attention. v6: Change to write 1's to clear error. (Sathyanarayanan) v7: No changes. Rebasing on pci main branch as per Bjorn comments. v8: Just return "status & PCI_ERR_UNC_SURPDN" instead of true and false and allow C to handle the conversion to bool. (Ilpo) --- drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c index 94111e438241..ba7240a2ba2f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/dpc.c @@ -303,10 +303,74 @@ void dpc_process_error(struct pci_dev *pdev) } } +static void pci_clear_surpdn_errors(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + u32 reg32; + + if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions) { + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, + ®32); + pci_write_config_dword(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_RP_PIO_STATUS, + reg32); + } + + /* + * In practice, Surprise Down errors have been observed to also set + * error bits in the Status Register as well as the Fatal Error + * Detected bit in the Device Status Register. + */ + pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_STATUS, 0xffff); + + pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_FED); +} + +static void dpc_handle_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + if (!pcie_wait_for_link(pdev, false)) { + pci_info(pdev, "Data Link Layer Link Active not cleared in 1000 msec\n"); + goto out; + } + + if (pdev->dpc_rp_extensions && dpc_wait_rp_inactive(pdev)) + goto out; + + pci_aer_raw_clear_status(pdev); + pci_clear_surpdn_errors(pdev); + + pci_write_config_word(pdev, pdev->dpc_cap + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS, + PCI_EXP_DPC_STATUS_TRIGGER); + +out: + clear_bit(PCI_DPC_RECOVERED, &pdev->priv_flags); + wake_up_all(&dpc_completed_waitqueue); +} + +static bool dpc_is_surprise_removal(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + u16 status; + + if (!pdev->is_hotplug_bridge) + return false; + + pci_read_config_word(pdev, pdev->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_UNCOR_STATUS, + &status); + + return status & PCI_ERR_UNC_SURPDN; +} + static irqreturn_t dpc_handler(int irq, void *context) { struct pci_dev *pdev = context; + /* + * According to PCIe r6.0 sec 6.7.6, errors are an expected side effect + * of async removal and should be ignored by software. + */ + if (dpc_is_surprise_removal(pdev)) { + dpc_handle_surprise_removal(pdev); + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + dpc_process_error(pdev); /* We configure DPC so it only triggers on ERR_FATAL */