From patchwork Sat Jul 1 13:42:51 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Haibo Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 115033 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:994d:0:b0:3d9:f83d:47d9 with SMTP id k13csp11045153vqr; Sat, 1 Jul 2023 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ59iUlrMDbdUGgzHhWV8H9Pr/ztMLeXYPPj4Psxq3Q2DLVIqb0DsoXbGqJWq6QVeQtaJkcm X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:6192:b0:3a1:f2fc:7e13 with SMTP id dn18-20020a056808619200b003a1f2fc7e13mr5260609oib.57.1688218765057; Sat, 01 Jul 2023 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688218765; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YaCyeD++Blk3xm2vaqC92pAHg9zEUyNZjAqJ1TKOKQ3/LLeHW7ZqvNexWS0m+khUHb EJGWfHdd1F8GrHr/+SevdRn/UpZYoaNDViWGYdeef88fxJI41x1DIBjw/F9XFGkx8G0m IGULKp5r7yBMveJSO5aWAy6ubQci2FZoBo6bBoSi3akrtJFW62+S+Csk8Xu2gIYx4/qQ O2j2F4ld3VjkfwQoO+bwXca2XI/ILJzki1AhJ3vWbHr/aSgs6+6ulYdWAdQX09uFQbH8 Tpj3DvaWXWsHMDMFyGdmku3qTY0zPyeonlzoOzBg6NINK7l3OFXbA6xu+H7sHFeqsiwj 8U9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:from :dkim-signature; bh=DIaiUCtXjcyuEdAM1VNsYDAmB6XoYG0R+Aj0XlN53nE=; fh=7EPU0yFgKq6DK54DdRhAOTNBSTrU9EP8Vi5A8HZNYZw=; b=qrX0xBApaSox5WIpn5hAw64kg/3dCPuDyOxBJPJq09607xoHM8nbPF/3jhwXCnV1Cw TJPiRnFiTyaRiNTVpwTxyvZCOK2t8p0MwDt/A9wuaxAONA4O4Oq+17wZ5WUKubGPj2pj krCkR9BtEZu6J0dekIu0BLx3coMf8NNPm7EgWek806oiDCntu8Ga4voX5B5xtttP9PYd 0m5WoCQ5rs1KqVqem0ZWrvHW1dYUOYMXjo9zSytaKxYN1yO/a6ujXXC28VBzi/g0j9E0 BqKk4yycoIqKQv5fjZB0tDNaZX/2Z8dCdYLj0XCUQFHJwn9k/xhE3aZ4beHDZMn2fGMa a+pA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=X76LLB+d; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cg16-20020a056a00291000b0066879af7571si3917624pfb.130.2023.07.01.06.39.10; Sat, 01 Jul 2023 06:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=X76LLB+d; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229665AbjGANh7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:37:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48916 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230212AbjGANh6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:37:58 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0626421A; Sat, 1 Jul 2023 06:37:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1688218665; x=1719754665; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=quNRDcUJypPIG/seUf6i3WDOA80CN8cLhVMRoyeshgI=; b=X76LLB+dRZT7pY/5CLu/RCnVOZXzDUzdkzwOABPMUh0N7YQMzsLdBgLp IDjc9t2YC7g2IerxLBzqovAa6Tpo/zuIJHBLdSzV2aRQX0RAd+rbFP7G7 dPrKdNTwXgSSjlUcTIso/ZFCOqLkJ7SD8WQpQxOoDCvnpRsnrViiWGDNy WRfEOoFIYA6oUGdPWuTMRtiZKZfaYDnMXkjj4EGszdJLZJkSgJsuAjYtp TGczojgHVAhck1VUAG1rW3c3qTRsBD0I3nzXHW4lwUM87BtnSOWbIoNYH kc/rMWrHt0vKUCNRqE5X8+F3b+JYmY98lWHN1Z7K2Bpcs+BbB44YKe2pI g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10758"; a="342926098" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,173,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="342926098" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jul 2023 06:37:45 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10758"; a="747693890" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,173,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="747693890" Received: from haibo-optiplex-7090.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.132]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jul 2023 06:37:38 -0700 From: Haibo Xu Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Ricardo Koller , Vishal Annapurve , David Matlack , Vipin Sharma , Colton Lewis , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove print_reg's dependency on vcpu_config Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 21:42:51 +0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1770225679957021326?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1770225679957021326?= From: Andrew Jones print_reg() and its helpers only use the vcpu_config pointer for config_name(). So just pass the config name in instead, which is used as a prefix in asserts. print_reg() can now be compiled independently of config_name(). Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu --- .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 52 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index 915272c342f9..424285d39965 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static bool find_reg(__u64 regs[], __u64 nr_regs, __u64 reg) #define CORE_SPSR_XX_NR_WORDS 2 #define CORE_FPREGS_XX_NR_WORDS 4 -static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) +static const char *core_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { __u64 core_off = id & ~REG_MASK, idx; @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]) ... KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[30]): idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0])) / CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS; - TEST_ASSERT(idx < 31, "%s: Unexpected regs.regs index: %lld", config_name(c), idx); + TEST_ASSERT(idx < 31, "%s: Unexpected regs.regs index: %lld", prefix, idx); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.regs[%lld])", idx); case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp): return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(regs.sp)"; @@ -154,12 +154,12 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0]) ... KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[KVM_NR_SPSR - 1]): idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[0])) / CORE_SPSR_XX_NR_WORDS; - TEST_ASSERT(idx < KVM_NR_SPSR, "%s: Unexpected spsr index: %lld", config_name(c), idx); + TEST_ASSERT(idx < KVM_NR_SPSR, "%s: Unexpected spsr index: %lld", prefix, idx); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(spsr[%lld])", idx); case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0]) ... KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[31]): idx = (core_off - KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[0])) / CORE_FPREGS_XX_NR_WORDS; - TEST_ASSERT(idx < 32, "%s: Unexpected fp_regs.vregs index: %lld", config_name(c), idx); + TEST_ASSERT(idx < 32, "%s: Unexpected fp_regs.vregs index: %lld", prefix, idx); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs[%lld])", idx); case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr): return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr)"; @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ static const char *core_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) return "KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpcr)"; } - TEST_FAIL("%s: Unknown core reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + TEST_FAIL("%s: Unknown core reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return NULL; } -static const char *sve_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) +static const char *sve_id_to_str(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { __u64 sve_off, n, i; @@ -181,37 +181,37 @@ static const char *sve_id_to_str(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) sve_off = id & ~(REG_MASK | ((1ULL << 5) - 1)); i = id & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_MAX_SLICES - 1); - TEST_ASSERT(i == 0, "%s: Currently we don't expect slice > 0, reg id 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + TEST_ASSERT(i == 0, "%s: Currently we don't expect slice > 0, reg id 0x%llx", prefix, id); switch (sve_off) { case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG_BASE ... KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG_BASE + (1ULL << 5) * KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS - 1: n = (id >> 5) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_ZREGS - 1); TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(n, 0), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE ZREG id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE ZREG id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(%lld, 0)", n); case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG_BASE ... KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG_BASE + (1ULL << 5) * KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS - 1: n = (id >> 5) & (KVM_ARM64_SVE_NUM_PREGS - 1); TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(n, 0), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE PREG id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE PREG id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return strdup_printf("KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(%lld, 0)", n); case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR_BASE: TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE FFR id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SVE FFR id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); return "KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_FFR(0)"; } return NULL; } -static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) +static void print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) { unsigned op0, op1, crn, crm, op2; const char *reg_size = NULL; TEST_ASSERT((id & KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK) == KVM_REG_ARM64, - "%s: KVM_REG_ARM64 missing in reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: KVM_REG_ARM64 missing in reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) { case KVM_REG_SIZE_U8: @@ -243,16 +243,16 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) break; default: TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected reg size: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx", - config_name(c), (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT, id); + prefix, (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT, id); } switch (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) { case KVM_REG_ARM_CORE: - printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | %s,\n", reg_size, core_id_to_str(c, id)); + printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE | %s,\n", reg_size, core_id_to_str(prefix, id)); break; case KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX: TEST_ASSERT(!(id & ~(REG_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_VAL_MASK)), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in DEMUX reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in DEMUX reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM64 | %s | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX | KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_CCSIDR | %lld,\n", reg_size, id & KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_VAL_MASK); break; @@ -263,25 +263,25 @@ static void print_reg(struct vcpu_config *c, __u64 id) crm = (id & KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_SHIFT; op2 = (id & KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_SHIFT; TEST_ASSERT(id == ARM64_SYS_REG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in SYSREG reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in SYSREG reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tARM64_SYS_REG(%d, %d, %d, %d, %d),\n", op0, op1, crn, crm, op2); break; case KVM_REG_ARM_FW: TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(id & 0xffff), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in FW reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in FW reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff); break; case KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP: TEST_ASSERT(id == KVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(id & 0xffff), - "%s: Unexpected bits set in the bitmap feature FW reg id: 0x%llx", config_name(c), id); + "%s: Unexpected bits set in the bitmap feature FW reg id: 0x%llx", prefix, id); printf("\tKVM_REG_ARM_FW_FEAT_BMAP_REG(%lld),\n", id & 0xffff); break; case KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE: - printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(c, id)); + printf("\t%s,\n", sve_id_to_str(prefix, id)); break; default: TEST_FAIL("%s: Unexpected coproc type: 0x%llx in reg id: 0x%llx", - config_name(c), (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT, id); + prefix, (id & KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) >> KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT, id); } } @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) __u64 id = reg_list->reg[i]; if ((print_list && !filter_reg(id)) || (print_filtered && filter_reg(id))) - print_reg(c, id); + print_reg(config_name(c), id); } putchar('\n'); return; @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, reg_list->reg[i], &addr); if (ret) { printf("%s: Failed to get ", config_name(c)); - print_reg(c, reg.id); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n'); ++failed_get; } @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); - print_reg(c, reg.id); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n'); ++failed_reject; } @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); if (ret) { printf("%s: Failed to set ", config_name(c)); - print_reg(c, reg.id); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n'); ++failed_set; } @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) "Consider adding them to the blessed reg " "list with the following lines:\n\n", config_name(c), new_regs); for_each_new_reg(i) - print_reg(c, reg_list->reg[i]); + print_reg(config_name(c), reg_list->reg[i]); putchar('\n'); } @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_config *c) printf("\n%s: There are %d missing registers.\n" "The following lines are missing registers:\n\n", config_name(c), missing_regs); for_each_missing_reg(i) - print_reg(c, blessed_reg[i]); + print_reg(config_name(c), blessed_reg[i]); putchar('\n'); }