[v3,2/2] PCI: dwc: Cleanup in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq()

Message ID c5499db2-2c25-4765-b9e0-1fa26da1cc45@moroto.mountain
State New
Headers
Series [v3,1/2] PCI: dwc: Fix a 64bit bug in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() |

Commit Message

Dan Carpenter Jan. 22, 2024, 3:21 p.m. UTC
  I recently changed the code in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() to use
ALIGN_DOWN(). The code in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() is similar so
update it to match as well.  (No effect on runtime, just a cleanup).

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
---
v2: Add this patch
v3: Use ALIGN_DOWN() as a style improvement

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Niklas Cassel Jan. 22, 2024, 8:24 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 06:21:00PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I recently changed the code in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() to use
> ALIGN_DOWN(). The code in dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq() is similar so
> update it to match as well.  (No effect on runtime, just a cleanup).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: Add this patch
> v3: Use ALIGN_DOWN() as a style improvement
> 
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index 51679c6702cf..1c8d2e938851 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> @@ -483,8 +483,8 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
>  		msg_data = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
>  	}
>  	aligned_offset = msg_addr_lower & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
> -	msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 |
> -			(msg_addr_lower & ~aligned_offset);
> +	msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower;
> +	msg_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);
>  	ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, 0, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
>  				  epc->mem->window.page_size);
>  	if (ret)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>


Although, if I'm being super nitpicky
(sorry... and feel free to ignore),
I think this is slightly cleaner:

--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -482,9 +482,10 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
                reg = ep_func->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_DATA_32;
                msg_data = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
        }
-       aligned_offset = msg_addr_lower & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
-       msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 |
-                       (msg_addr_lower & ~aligned_offset);
+       msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower;
+
+       aligned_offset = msg_addr & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
+       msg_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);
        ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, 0, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
                                  epc->mem->window.page_size);
        if (ret)
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
index 51679c6702cf..1c8d2e938851 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -483,8 +483,8 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
 		msg_data = dw_pcie_ep_readw_dbi(ep, func_no, reg);
 	}
 	aligned_offset = msg_addr_lower & (epc->mem->window.page_size - 1);
-	msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 |
-			(msg_addr_lower & ~aligned_offset);
+	msg_addr = ((u64)msg_addr_upper) << 32 | msg_addr_lower;
+	msg_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(msg_addr, epc->mem->window.page_size);
 	ret = dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(epc, func_no, 0, ep->msi_mem_phys, msg_addr,
 				  epc->mem->window.page_size);
 	if (ret)