[v4,3/8] mtd: ubi: block: don't return on error when removing

Message ID bac56760e1abec46e1ca5582fc30cbca1f42af9d.1691717480.git.daniel@makrotopia.org
State New
Headers
Series mtd: ubi: allow UBI volumes to provide NVMEM |

Commit Message

Daniel Golle Aug. 11, 2023, 1:37 a.m. UTC
  There is no point on returning the error from ubiblock_remove in case
it is being called due to a volume removal event -- the volume is gone,
we should destroy and remove the ubiblock device no matter what.

Introduce new boolean parameter 'force' to tell ubiblock_remove to go
on even in case the ubiblock device is still busy. Use that new option
when calling ubiblock_remove due to a UBI_VOLUME_REMOVED event.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 6 +++---
 drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c  | 2 +-
 drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h   | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Richard Weinberger Oct. 3, 2023, 6:14 p.m. UTC | #1
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Daniel Golle" <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> An: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>, "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, "richard" <richard@nod.at>,
> "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>, "Daniel Golle" <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
> "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "devicetree" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel"
> <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. August 2023 03:37:12
> Betreff: [PATCH v4 3/8] mtd: ubi: block: don't return on error when removing

> There is no point on returning the error from ubiblock_remove in case
> it is being called due to a volume removal event -- the volume is gone,
> we should destroy and remove the ubiblock device no matter what.
> 
> Introduce new boolean parameter 'force' to tell ubiblock_remove to go
> on even in case the ubiblock device is still busy. Use that new option
> when calling ubiblock_remove due to a UBI_VOLUME_REMOVED event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c  | 2 +-
> drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h   | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c
> index 437c5b83ffe51..69fa6fecb8494 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c
> @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ static void ubiblock_cleanup(struct ubiblock *dev)
> 	idr_remove(&ubiblock_minor_idr, dev->gd->first_minor);
> }
> 
> -int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi)
> +int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi, bool force)
> {
> 	struct ubiblock *dev;
> 	int ret;
> @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi)
> 
> 	/* Found a device, let's lock it so we can check if it's busy */
> 	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_mutex);
> -	if (dev->refcnt > 0) {
> +	if (dev->refcnt > 0 && !force) {
> 		ret = -EBUSY;
> 		goto out_unlock_dev;

Is it really safe to destroy the blk queue (via ubiblock_cleanup()) if refcnt is > 0?

Thanks,
//richard
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c
index 437c5b83ffe51..69fa6fecb8494 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/block.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@  static void ubiblock_cleanup(struct ubiblock *dev)
 	idr_remove(&ubiblock_minor_idr, dev->gd->first_minor);
 }
 
-int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi)
+int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi, bool force)
 {
 	struct ubiblock *dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@  int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi)
 
 	/* Found a device, let's lock it so we can check if it's busy */
 	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_mutex);
-	if (dev->refcnt > 0) {
+	if (dev->refcnt > 0 && !force) {
 		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out_unlock_dev;
 	}
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@  static int ubiblock_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 		 */
 		break;
 	case UBI_VOLUME_REMOVED:
-		ubiblock_remove(&nt->vi);
+		ubiblock_remove(&nt->vi, true);
 		break;
 	case UBI_VOLUME_RESIZED:
 		ubiblock_resize(&nt->vi);
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c
index f43430b9c1e65..bb55e863dd296 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/cdev.c
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@  static long vol_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 		struct ubi_volume_info vi;
 
 		ubi_get_volume_info(desc, &vi);
-		err = ubiblock_remove(&vi);
+		err = ubiblock_remove(&vi, false);
 		break;
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
index c8f1bd4fa1008..44c0eeaf1e1b0 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/ubi.h
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@  static inline void ubi_fastmap_destroy_checkmap(struct ubi_volume *vol) {}
 int ubiblock_init(void);
 void ubiblock_exit(void);
 int ubiblock_create(struct ubi_volume_info *vi);
-int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi);
+int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi, bool force);
 #else
 static inline int ubiblock_init(void) { return 0; }
 static inline void ubiblock_exit(void) {}
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@  static inline int ubiblock_create(struct ubi_volume_info *vi)
 {
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }
-static inline int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi)
+static inline int ubiblock_remove(struct ubi_volume_info *vi, bool force)
 {
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }