Message ID | a6c3790105fa30e89f39f0dccc7d699f5c1c30b7.1706690577.git.perry.yuan@amd.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-46065-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7301:2087:b0:106:209c:c626 with SMTP id gs7csp1761084dyb; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:07:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IENCrHhDAiwBTI4LS+sp0FzAacqZ6pnrKaddptoXhVDMwHo604dgNOnOK76iGh4Www3RdRg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4c54:b0:a35:992e:2936 with SMTP id d20-20020a1709064c5400b00a35992e2936mr709398ejw.13.1706692024774; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:07:04 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUYelx83S77TsgfHJeSOkIo4DsWuDXC5YAnGlSnwG8Ca3jJ98xoqluuelbF5asxX3ErCUX/3E/Mc2cYE8DKxdJ2O5DXLw== Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dt17-20020a170906b79100b00a35ed305bf3si2217532ejb.810.2024.01.31.01.07.04 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:07:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-46065-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amd.com header.s=selector1 header.b=wejaw3Ee; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-46065-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-46065-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amd.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCA751F2D610 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49DC5FBAF; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b="wejaw3Ee" Received: from NAM04-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam04on2050.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.101.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E7E76C7B; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.101.50 ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706691078; cv=fail; b=nsLSrfv0zxEF08i5r0EMYZMoQkGNvMgDtY41niRUX30q1H9s44lU94v0Pol0c+iawmvFQnZHfCte9tUpvrRZE+Cz37piBjd4ESj48F9U+KgcaZwD86AUmYg5CRs9CvacvI0YeVjP26IH7+DA4rzVU9pGn6tiwHGgbwlG1Zkhtzk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706691078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XAF5ce3XyZXbPU84LHOZAJVx4GebJKQKHUszBVxcnSY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lI+q6bHfT5F+RAwxHHDu7tEhy3HPbsfVut43NR1p3y5/5wTvHFgukJXA78TuLW/0dkAa9m74wbUs/JoBA/1wiqlFJeTxbIjJ/REh4itkwWT0fRBHosBvfHwkbf3f+mJLJHUV4wsM0yrnIoZ415XxZNWTuccYmibffOY8MdVnnYg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amd.com header.i=@amd.com header.b=wejaw3Ee; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.101.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amd.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=amd.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VpvKFPMEsbXvffaVsKhKGvMSG55CAEYCqtqjg7+uLezCl3HvAmAXeIAzw4p7K2eNzWvcx3192P/olq9oM3vwwx7MSqD5uW12tJ89k9SW+DrsyEuzIT5OBRJ6lozwby8tvhmmJ54Q5G2VCfaoo1xeAPD+D4/UVej7X8ymuWK0RAwiCt3tjFoDNctpzAQd8Mozhbjb2KJtcX54Sz6jfxAt+EmDzeJVtlVm0+cE83RucKyq9KAykZh2Io0xpAcjQdS7ZPFczsOQ6jKb5Grxqm1VuHo7dAuuATJGew/3KEC6rUGipuU3AyUY01DB8pSvyzzm2nPxQrH+PWaaI3Lp+2LQvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=LCDztHek/N8FFyzqsQAe8naig66K2Nj+RfSp1kzukSU=; b=bh9FiH1gSjDAJgRZ5EKH1rQNx4gdV6dqkG7KqH/GLNrc+qbQcsVVM/eH2S3eUf3HV0k8FRezytd6coaDyOemPlfEmq7wwoxhhhRLJKfO3rOo1mN6KqgSWEsNL8wc23FGAR3U9v2YbAAYbG32pkcH5fTy4nDBxnAIkdZMHsIZ3IYkGRJqn2aTy5gO1QJRPShqcN0eV1HU1nNBFzX3EtftiFEif0pZ5U/CQjmZ9UI1r+lfw5qKq41iFrb8Co32Glz2uTII28+JD51D9gWenVV0TdgTZhQajE6Mn749HOE1S1dISVMIRpYSXW1T5Lw7r7IWXQ5mXxvb1nuGF5CacJkiKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=intel.com smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=LCDztHek/N8FFyzqsQAe8naig66K2Nj+RfSp1kzukSU=; b=wejaw3Ee3fEF+Qk6BhkRTLyoJGCvruAWjozcKon1DMQvzCl/L3cc+sHItOEbLvKH+04aycsRa4mNqw1VIsHAr4hYRwI2TVoppT8ZvoWKnl+8D+amqw5yGHwYfskFqcG5kA6BawNeaLICzxoLO9VXvpzHWXyz0jKON3d952VICCc= Received: from CYXPR03CA0010.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:930:d0::17) by LV8PR12MB9449.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:204::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7228.32; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:51:13 +0000 Received: from CY4PEPF0000FCC2.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:930:d0:cafe::d7) by CYXPR03CA0010.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:930:d0::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7249.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:51:13 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by CY4PEPF0000FCC2.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.7181.13 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 08:51:13 +0000 Received: from pyuan-Chachani-VN.amd.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.34; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 02:51:10 -0600 From: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> To: <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>, <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, <Ray.Huang@amd.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>, <Borislav.Petkov@amd.com> CC: <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>, <Xinmei.Huang@amd.com>, <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>, <Li.Meng@amd.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 5/6] cppc_acpi: print error message if CPPC is unsupported Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:50:20 +0800 Message-ID: <a6c3790105fa30e89f39f0dccc7d699f5c1c30b7.1706690577.git.perry.yuan@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <cover.1706690577.git.perry.yuan@amd.com> References: <cover.1706690577.git.perry.yuan@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB03.amd.com (10.181.40.144) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CY4PEPF0000FCC2:EE_|LV8PR12MB9449:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 40ea7d61-070e-4319-4318-08dc2239c779 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: OyalqeluZdf5izcPCiMieoqyKFykZMN6A2m79a4Umt0zFqnywXxoWINV011C7ntcR8IEGQ/dqPhJbsgZ+U3kkq3l5ZLCIXuAJigW35tkW9E0WV4y+NMTjbwiqPdR5M4L8rQu9gBIOSvprK9nAVW4rAFAEfrrHBPw1pcknsrwiwUtI4xAQMKntSuACI9sylrta/dS326Q+yPzRdvjqpjaL4vv3lGn2xvogdqEAihbiwJGkdYzpd95fIgmJ5p5pRezGnDoBD1gAF6sGPTQ3CSSw+WUCev5EPS8BFI4nYnEZu+3g1CIK1hLvNKDjUDXriqYC4RVAmsoXbzEyNm5QgwQSomHiTnVV4DSVhMqg9xWK3fC0TPP0EmFmm5nT0paguegvovesqzhNQY2H7vRmhheK976TCPZk9NibVreFodnzlVWOqymjU6ehupMiOdQqu9S+ADlZhROChvMYuLs7c4VJm/om28GEDKadt9s9r5i8lRhls0rSlcgDqkqzUaI4ARKhIauNonfoiEfNJeBcF2K3i3Mt2sGEbErqFD6oVxw77N3DQ2TDzBkFjuxbSCNHt7qzWZVkpjOk7IqCc+7ANgdW8IGg1qqp3O5wWtINhOAGbS0NcIIfKQMH498ovZ3cEWGcZrq0PVYVw8muSG+Ryo23M/jh/kuXjfwCTInuNtb4XOPiYOHiYyUEzkQWD16Awq9N6CozTOKLjmwDTg9+P9uhq3BTngRpz85gWuNF+YrUMfl4kLlDjDpOugvleMYbJ6lBIYbt7DuOWxnCDH/wNd3Kw== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(376002)(230922051799003)(451199024)(64100799003)(1800799012)(82310400011)(186009)(40470700004)(36840700001)(46966006)(316002)(44832011)(6636002)(356005)(2906002)(40460700003)(40480700001)(54906003)(36860700001)(8936002)(8676002)(36756003)(4326008)(15650500001)(47076005)(86362001)(110136005)(5660300002)(70206006)(81166007)(70586007)(82740400003)(83380400001)(26005)(426003)(336012)(16526019)(2616005)(6666004)(7696005)(478600001)(41300700001)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2024 08:51:13.3767 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 40ea7d61-070e-4319-4318-08dc2239c779 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY4PEPF0000FCC2.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: LV8PR12MB9449 X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1789596296481659353 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1789596296481659353 |
Series |
AMD Pstate Fixes And Enhancements
|
|
Commit Message
Yuan, Perry
Jan. 31, 2024, 8:50 a.m. UTC
to be more clear what is wrong with CPPC when pstate driver failed to
load which has dependency on the CPPC capabilities.
Add one more debug message to notify user if CPPC is not supported by
the CPU, then it will be easy to find out what need to fix for pstate
driver loading issue.
[ 0.477523] amd_pstate: the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS or ACPI disabled
Above message is not clear enough to verify whether CPPC is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On 1/31/2024 02:50, Perry Yuan wrote: > to be more clear what is wrong with CPPC when pstate driver failed to > load which has dependency on the CPPC capabilities. > > Add one more debug message to notify user if CPPC is not supported by > the CPU, then it will be easy to find out what need to fix for pstate > driver loading issue. > > [ 0.477523] amd_pstate: the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS or ACPI disabled > > Above message is not clear enough to verify whether CPPC is not supported. > > Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > index 7ff269a78c20..217c11c12b57 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c > @@ -676,8 +676,10 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) > > if (!osc_sb_cppc2_support_acked) { > pr_debug("CPPC v2 _OSC not acked\n"); > - if (!cpc_supported_by_cpu()) > - return -ENODEV; > + if (!cpc_supported_by_cpu()) { > + pr_debug("CPPC is not supported\n"); I would argue this doesn't add any value to a user. To help a user it should be "CPPC is not supported by the CPU". > + return -ENODEV; > + } This whitespace is wrong > } > > /* Parse the ACPI _CPC table for this CPU. */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 7ff269a78c20..217c11c12b57 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -676,8 +676,10 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (!osc_sb_cppc2_support_acked) { pr_debug("CPPC v2 _OSC not acked\n"); - if (!cpc_supported_by_cpu()) - return -ENODEV; + if (!cpc_supported_by_cpu()) { + pr_debug("CPPC is not supported\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } } /* Parse the ACPI _CPC table for this CPU. */