gfs2: Set error on error path

Message ID ZRZrUMzweaJeEJuD@runicha.com
State New
Headers
Series gfs2: Set error on error path |

Commit Message

Deepak R Varma Sept. 29, 2023, 6:14 a.m. UTC
  Set the error variable inside the error path on failure. Saves
unnecessary variable assignment during normal execution.

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
---
 fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Dan Carpenter Sept. 29, 2023, 7:14 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:44:40AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> Set the error variable inside the error path on failure. Saves
> unnecessary variable assignment during normal execution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> ---
>  fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> index ef7017fb6951..93bd8ea34444 100644
> --- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> @@ -162,9 +162,10 @@ int gfs2_unstuff_dinode(struct gfs2_inode *ip)
>  
>  	down_write(&ip->i_rw_mutex);
>  	page = grab_cache_page(inode->i_mapping, 0);
> -	error = -ENOMEM;
> -	if (!page)
> +	if (!page) {
> +		error = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out;
> +	}

It used to be that the other way was faster?  I'm pretty sure the
compiler can figure it out these days.  Please don't randomly start
changing people's prefered style unless it's drivers/staging/ code.

regards,
dan carpenter
  
Deepak R Varma Sept. 29, 2023, 7:32 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2023-09-29 at 10:14 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:44:40AM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > Set the error variable inside the error path on failure. Saves
> > unnecessary variable assignment during normal execution.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/gfs2/bmap.c | 5 +++--
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> > index ef7017fb6951..93bd8ea34444 100644
> > --- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
> > @@ -162,9 +162,10 @@ int gfs2_unstuff_dinode(struct gfs2_inode *ip)
> >  
> >         down_write(&ip->i_rw_mutex);
> >         page = grab_cache_page(inode->i_mapping, 0);
> > -       error = -ENOMEM;
> > -       if (!page)
> > +       if (!page) {
> > +               error = -ENOMEM;
> >                 goto out;
> > +       }
> 
> It used to be that the other way was faster?  I'm pretty sure the
> compiler can figure it out these days.  Please don't randomly start
> changing people's prefered style unless it's drivers/staging/ code.
> 
Hi Dan,
Thank you for the feedback. I did not know about the compiler
optimization resulting in original code being faster.
I will let the maintainers comment on breaking the style.

regards,
deepak.

> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
index ef7017fb6951..93bd8ea34444 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/bmap.c
@@ -162,9 +162,10 @@  int gfs2_unstuff_dinode(struct gfs2_inode *ip)
 
 	down_write(&ip->i_rw_mutex);
 	page = grab_cache_page(inode->i_mapping, 0);
-	error = -ENOMEM;
-	if (!page)
+	if (!page) {
+		error = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
+	}
 	error = __gfs2_unstuff_inode(ip, page);
 	unlock_page(page);
 	put_page(page);