soc: imx: imx93-pd: No need to set device_driver owner

Message ID Y6SZjDKWve8/T/ld@qemulion
State New
Headers
Series soc: imx: imx93-pd: No need to set device_driver owner |

Commit Message

Deepak R Varma Dec. 22, 2022, 5:53 p.m. UTC
  There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
module_platform_driver() helper function.

Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
semantic patch.

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>
---
Note: Proposed change compile tested only using ARM64 defconfig.

 drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

--
2.34.1
  

Comments

Shawn Guo Jan. 1, 2023, 5:29 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:23:16PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> There is no need to exclusively set the .owner member of the struct
> device_driver when defining the platform_driver struct. The Linux core
> takes care of setting the .owner member as part of the call to
> module_platform_driver() helper function.
> 
> Issue identified using the platform_no_drv_owner.cocci Coccinelle
> semantic patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@mailo.com>

Applied, thanks!
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c b/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c
index 4d235c8c4924..832deeed8fd6 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/imx/imx93-pd.c
@@ -164,7 +164,6 @@  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx93_pd_ids);
 static struct platform_driver imx93_power_domain_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name	= "imx93_power_domain",
-		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
 		.of_match_table = imx93_pd_ids,
 	},
 	.probe = imx93_pd_probe,