staging: vt6655: Fix Lines should not end with a '('
Commit Message
Code style warnings reported by checkpatch.
Improve the layout of a function header:
Put the first parameter immediately after the '(' and align the other
parameters underneath it.
Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 04:05:06PM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote:
> Code style warnings reported by checkpatch.
> Improve the layout of a function header:
> Put the first parameter immediately after the '(' and align the other
> parameters underneath it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> index 5bdb5176772c..ff855def0bd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> @@ -87,33 +87,29 @@ static const unsigned short wFB_Opt1[2][5] = {
> /*--------------------- Static Functions --------------------------*/
> static
> void
> -s_vFillRTSHead(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - void *pvRTS,
> - unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> - bool bNeedAck,
> - bool bDisCRC,
> - struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> - unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> - unsigned char byFBOption
> -);
> +s_vFillRTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + void *pvRTS,
> + unsigned int cbFrameLength,
> + bool bNeedAck,
> + bool bDisCRC,
> + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> + unsigned short wCurrentRate,
> + unsigned char byFBOption);
Why not also put the "static void" on the same line as the function
name?
>
> static
> void
> -s_vGenerateTxParameter(
> - struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> - unsigned char byPktType,
> - struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *,
> - void *pvRrvTime,
> - void *pvRTS,
> - void *pvCTS,
> - unsigned int cbFrameSize,
> - bool bNeedACK,
> - unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> - void *psEthHeader,
> - unsigned short wCurrentRate
> -);
> +s_vGenerateTxParameter(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
> + unsigned char byPktType,
> + struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *,
> + void *pvRrvTime,
> + void *pvRTS,
> + void *pvCTS,
> + unsigned int cbFrameSize,
> + bool bNeedACK,
> + unsigned int uDMAIdx,
> + void *psEthHeader,
> + unsigned short wCurrentRate);
I do not understand this indentation at all, how did you choose it?
thanks,
greg k-h
@@ -87,33 +87,29 @@ static const unsigned short wFB_Opt1[2][5] = {
/*--------------------- Static Functions --------------------------*/
static
void
-s_vFillRTSHead(
- struct vnt_private *pDevice,
- unsigned char byPktType,
- void *pvRTS,
- unsigned int cbFrameLength,
- bool bNeedAck,
- bool bDisCRC,
- struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
- unsigned short wCurrentRate,
- unsigned char byFBOption
-);
+s_vFillRTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
+ unsigned char byPktType,
+ void *pvRTS,
+ unsigned int cbFrameLength,
+ bool bNeedAck,
+ bool bDisCRC,
+ struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
+ unsigned short wCurrentRate,
+ unsigned char byFBOption);
static
void
-s_vGenerateTxParameter(
- struct vnt_private *pDevice,
- unsigned char byPktType,
- struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *,
- void *pvRrvTime,
- void *pvRTS,
- void *pvCTS,
- unsigned int cbFrameSize,
- bool bNeedACK,
- unsigned int uDMAIdx,
- void *psEthHeader,
- unsigned short wCurrentRate
-);
+s_vGenerateTxParameter(struct vnt_private *pDevice,
+ unsigned char byPktType,
+ struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *,
+ void *pvRrvTime,
+ void *pvRTS,
+ void *pvCTS,
+ unsigned int cbFrameSize,
+ bool bNeedACK,
+ unsigned int uDMAIdx,
+ void *psEthHeader,
+ unsigned short wCurrentRate);
static unsigned int
s_cbFillTxBufHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice, unsigned char byPktType,