[v10,2/6] iommufd: Allow passing in iopt_access_list_id to iopt_remove_access()
Commit Message
This is a preparatory change for ioas replacement support for access.
The replacement routine does an iopt_add_access() at a new IOAS first
and then iopt_remove_access() at the old IOAS upon the success of the
first call. However, the first call overrides the iopt_access_list_id
in the access struct, resulting in that id un-erased in the xarray.
Add an iopt_access_list_id in iopt_remove_access, so the replacement
routine can save the id before it gets overwritten, and pass the id
in iopt_remove_access() for a proper cleanup.
The existing callers should just pass in access->iopt_access_list_id.
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.c | 6 +++---
drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Comments
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 4:25 AM
>
> This is a preparatory change for ioas replacement support for access.
> The replacement routine does an iopt_add_access() at a new IOAS first
> and then iopt_remove_access() at the old IOAS upon the success of the
> first call. However, the first call overrides the iopt_access_list_id
> in the access struct, resulting in that id un-erased in the xarray.
>
> Add an iopt_access_list_id in iopt_remove_access, so the replacement
> routine can save the id before it gets overwritten, and pass the id
> in iopt_remove_access() for a proper cleanup.
>
> The existing callers should just pass in access->iopt_access_list_id.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
@@ -690,7 +690,8 @@ void iommufd_access_destroy_object(struct iommufd_object *obj)
container_of(obj, struct iommufd_access, obj);
if (access->ioas) {
- iopt_remove_access(&access->ioas->iopt, access);
+ iopt_remove_access(&access->ioas->iopt, access,
+ access->iopt_access_list_id);
refcount_dec(&access->ioas->obj.users);
access->ioas = NULL;
}
@@ -776,7 +777,8 @@ void iommufd_access_detach(struct iommufd_access *access)
access->ops->unmap(access->data, 0, ULONG_MAX);
mutex_lock(&access->ioas_lock);
}
- iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access);
+ iopt_remove_access(&cur_ioas->iopt, access,
+ access->iopt_access_list_id);
refcount_dec(&cur_ioas->obj.users);
out:
access->ioas_unpin = NULL;
@@ -1158,12 +1158,12 @@ int iopt_add_access(struct io_pagetable *iopt, struct iommufd_access *access)
}
void iopt_remove_access(struct io_pagetable *iopt,
- struct iommufd_access *access)
+ struct iommufd_access *access,
+ u32 iopt_access_list_id)
{
down_write(&iopt->domains_rwsem);
down_write(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
- WARN_ON(xa_erase(&iopt->access_list, access->iopt_access_list_id) !=
- access);
+ WARN_ON(xa_erase(&iopt->access_list, iopt_access_list_id) != access);
WARN_ON(iopt_calculate_iova_alignment(iopt));
up_write(&iopt->iova_rwsem);
up_write(&iopt->domains_rwsem);
@@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ struct iommufd_access {
int iopt_add_access(struct io_pagetable *iopt, struct iommufd_access *access);
void iopt_remove_access(struct io_pagetable *iopt,
- struct iommufd_access *access);
+ struct iommufd_access *access,
+ u32 iopt_access_list_id);
void iommufd_access_destroy_object(struct iommufd_object *obj);
#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMUFD_TEST