Message ID | 20240224150546.368-5-ankita@nvidia.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-79720-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7300:a81b:b0:108:e6aa:91d0 with SMTP id bq27csp1189515dyb; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:08:35 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCVVAUITZRD2pQvUiUBkuvio10H3l8TVPPPZRhezqlwIYRu5lAtmQW+vjrrXe5etbsMa546XByZnJQoNALLsRDjtkxrBdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFadNHKI3KVKDNyXANeSWaVnhTMSVrcw1JMpVNODOt6w9PxYBWaCkNhWpS7/vzdmDIcfXJg X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a1e:b0:42e:7a79:c883 with SMTP id f30-20020a05622a1a1e00b0042e7a79c883mr193641qtb.46.1708787315371; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:08:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o13-20020a05620a228d00b007872be6f54csi1164305qkh.467.2024.02.24.07.08.35 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:08:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79720-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@Nvidia.com header.s=selector2 header.b=k8Z5dSS1; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79720-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-79720-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2151C1C2102C for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A145845028; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b="k8Z5dSS1" Received: from NAM02-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam02on2073.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.95.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 073F54E1C5; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.95.73 ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708787231; cv=fail; b=LpJHhop8QJLeqIchuN65SZa+gnkSKRVWCne1BKgeO9nRlJScf9CDwlaqAgb89Wg374TVJ0XOZHLy/c/igKrJBXt4ry4M53rh7YainhCuUU5Y4osA861wj16MlXewWJd0EHT76m3P/iyykGffsONpmJ++3DIrXWMCLX/pbDsHl20= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708787231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e0FhdWZczG3jNlJwaIceTYNLqtq7kTP1clVnsfufh/Y=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CXHExDqyHOM88LQWkwJwZtCVlLgMKDLZQqc5qvwe0AUOVgHRzw3OH6vJQvphYFWt9EDR8Zn7s+9gIGLUPDJ5aMQnky8dnAkmpUdYbYbeeZR5NGHTVkFVGfJSYNM/WpJ5jt4LvTiPfTprNV9v+rrlG0SCQI62JJ9EBDNB68cCcL0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b=k8Z5dSS1; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.95.73 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OcnfSWyOFQggSiPTsES65PhBheOmwfvj3zgWuTC9GWHqsJ2j2mjY4ZwNU4SJUwhc9x53l1C6biFXWtziQw+WxYDOpWWnrbUjItzDBD1qLLs1+qt5I/FYjojRZmqkBbWNeSP3GebSLtthUIt6fMEGQuv2XuoHLDYl5bztSPdR0p07cciaTEaMvlsIcqUGPRzqf9SHjgZOqDG2ph5IJvqINHVfwYwLG+zMpWW1pu/8nPX8wqe6X0Mc3mUkMJSOVIcBd41zIycC4Dp410PSG9loxEx08tWvvgIOhDb9wk09hEqj0Y9OTmv+0Pda7VgDDmLjZmEu/1Tr4+NVc0swjTgRwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=vrVed4bH4ZNo5+WAlGpRDDR5GnNw8bBIVXunyFMfGm8=; b=imUB0lDCeJbrMEpP74471V1uwXeC6zSjztnlULNvXgyu0dv3ZBz5AKFRnmvIbvzmYKO4kokxcRkX3vtJY9M1eLn54YsvQ3HNr4qUfKV8zwsMG9SlFd3LUqhokzJ4HmZpc4cpI83shk39unNjyXFjFFD4OygZJKHv3+ji6S2n9qKnYeK0QoNx/xZrTnsP4tCURd1GJ39WkVciDPEP2CNlSb5DeRLOl1fxoO9CNaUl1W6mw1kM/Qq7AAvLdD+JMmEcJ6R9AelNZhpNc0E4tQyRrjqt8tynH7EmxphT0QJE3U7oFi8P1uXlzlViBXb2MlaCjwFm66aktIEcKpyznax8CA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.160) smtp.rcpttodomain=kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vrVed4bH4ZNo5+WAlGpRDDR5GnNw8bBIVXunyFMfGm8=; b=k8Z5dSS1+XZWFfeyb7JtGwpF6xBbsOykuKYdSiI4lG1DjI2pLyD//987TA9VAmaEbOW4OqO7/nuY/0+wLeYfUe9mH7PqW6E9Ndo4XEI5Ycv4naE+HCJyn26NiadmBQZYr0cehi8skRdt2O9W4E+IhZp3sgMmCgu2qjOy748G/qGnEg4iOjTRiF9Z+F5kUUjUqB7oJG95Ow6JasVtqYxlKXRwyL946X4dBBBFPgHl8b30BS+1ZPCRo5MA3NmcgdHB4PmuPJ6eee0pUWyL/7zBuXeGpakWYlI7dtfN8z+lVw2CbkK7sKGkd2p+Eit51cjIaxuyKXh3cI232QcVzrtlDw== Received: from DM5PR08CA0052.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:60::41) by BY5PR12MB5511.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1d8::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7316.33; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:07:04 +0000 Received: from DS3PEPF000099D3.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:60:cafe::71) by DM5PR08CA0052.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:60::41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7292.48 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:07:04 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.160) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.160 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.160; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.160) by DS3PEPF000099D3.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.17.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7292.25 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:07:04 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.41; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:06:52 -0800 Received: from rnnvmail203.nvidia.com (10.129.68.9) by rnnvmail201.nvidia.com (10.129.68.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.12; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:06:50 -0800 Received: from sgarnayak-dt.nvidia.com (10.127.8.9) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.68.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.12 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:06:38 -0800 From: <ankita@nvidia.com> To: <ankita@nvidia.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, <james.morse@arm.com>, <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <reinette.chatre@intel.com>, <surenb@google.com>, <stefanha@redhat.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <andreyknvl@gmail.com>, <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>, <gshan@redhat.com>, <shahuang@redhat.com>, <ricarkol@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <rananta@google.com>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <david@redhat.com>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <bhe@redhat.com> CC: <aniketa@nvidia.com>, <cjia@nvidia.com>, <kwankhede@nvidia.com>, <targupta@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>, <acurrid@nvidia.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <danw@nvidia.com>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <mochs@nvidia.com>, <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: [PATCH v9 4/4] vfio: Convey kvm that the vfio-pci device is wc safe Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:35:46 +0530 Message-ID: <20240224150546.368-5-ankita@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20240224150546.368-1-ankita@nvidia.com> References: <20240224150546.368-1-ankita@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NV-OnPremToCloud: ExternallySecured X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DS3PEPF000099D3:EE_|BY5PR12MB5511:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: a1b01687-e8ad-4423-fd11-08dc354a4307 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: GxjN7Bwq1Hwv/A/mtDSKWWm4FjbCfLkQvpJEyuKbzX9Y6HdylNrePnfdtgf55bu9XhhbP6bLnOFqWF9i6xaIvdW7BvhuCWgdvoxhyq43q5a7orbA/0bSt95gkrspg2sPSGRrQuzL5mCEwyzmBYEgtTHmsSEm2yH4jU+N+H+Pjfb9EgWy/wHIHVRrvCxzQDccTcqD4WfTgWGZ7b5g38jcfd/asoc8kboPe1C/BMJTk/n8DCAwHf0xjRhCAD09b1KrNMA0zc9kmK5PnNvMmIOa7Vqbbad+RwMFuZDbDYjMg1c2bmomp7ZacCqQquXLOuinEn3dLlssscL0qF6deYGQOwyTIjNFDuib/i7Ld1xpwPEtIczzLZ3ab/KFz3/o8xb5C+5SU7ttaTD93P/ggwca9IGPRjSxe9eFv8JpCZVyzPI6KOoFc5N7KwTJvGunhtl/5QjGRPfMMENd6K4s+dYtIUfPo1ynL2fcxG+v4lMwFRaO/82ttdnhFvM/1JBG+wnMc9JxzTtJqSTtZU+fjzEzIxiOB0jrZEB3lE1XS28DR/fhn/1+MAN4k9ZRLRWUKaQ2yvtvU0QoU/J4u7xe9HnxmV2Q95zJgJbXPfbSbi/7bdKFH6Tlwwc9kS+nhkfk/mmdsaS8elePZESo6uhoynwlMKv7pHgt6TVbfCObTclF/JA= X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.160;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc6edge1.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(36860700004)(40470700004)(46966006)(921011);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2024 15:07:04.6499 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a1b01687-e8ad-4423-fd11-08dc354a4307 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.160];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DS3PEPF000099D3.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR12MB5511 X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1791793368016270581 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1791793368016270581 |
Series |
KVM: arm64: Allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory
|
|
Commit Message
Ankit Agrawal
Feb. 24, 2024, 3:05 p.m. UTC
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com> The VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED flag is implemented for ARM64, allowing KVM stage 2 device mapping attributes to use Normal-NC rather than DEVICE_nGnRE, which allows guest mappings supporting write-combining attributes (WC). ARM does not architecturally guarantee this is safe, and indeed some MMIO regions like the GICv2 VCPU interface can trigger uncontained faults if Normal-NC is used. To safely use VFIO in KVM the platform must guarantee full safety in the guest where no action taken against a MMIO mapping can trigger an uncontained failure. The expectation is that most VFIO PCI platforms support this for both mapping types, at least in common flows, based on some expectations of how PCI IP is integrated. So make vfio-pci set the VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED flag. Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com> --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c index 1cbc990d42e0..df6f99bdf70d 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c @@ -1862,8 +1862,25 @@ int vfio_pci_core_mmap(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma /* * See remap_pfn_range(), called from vfio_pci_fault() but we can't * change vm_flags within the fault handler. Set them now. + * + * VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED: The VMA flag is implemented for ARM64, + * allowing KVM stage 2 device mapping attributes to use Normal-NC + * rather than DEVICE_nGnRE, which allows guest mappings + * supporting write-combining attributes (WC). ARM does not + * architecturally guarantee this is safe, and indeed some MMIO + * regions like the GICv2 VCPU interface can trigger uncontained + * faults if Normal-NC is used. + * + * To safely use VFIO in KVM the platform must guarantee full + * safety in the guest where no action taken against a MMIO + * mapping can trigger an uncontained failure. The assumption is + * that most VFIO PCI platforms support this for both mapping types, + * at least in common flows, based on some expectations of how + * PCI IP is integrated. Hence VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED is set in + * the VMA flags. */ - vm_flags_set(vma, VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP); + vm_flags_set(vma, VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED | VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP | + VM_DONTEXPAND | VM_DONTDUMP); vma->vm_ops = &vfio_pci_mmap_ops; return 0;