Message ID | 20240224150546.368-3-ankita@nvidia.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-79717-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7300:a81b:b0:108:e6aa:91d0 with SMTP id bq27csp1189052dyb; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:07:54 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCUwRdTt/lweKMDtIPKq+lSgeeWoFMMIxl0oOFJrapzte5Vh1OYL4+ayZvEC29x8kOOyFscRISMvrwXN8md2606QNpByoQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkQC3KbWez8VdZO5NTfLvTUApE3uFqEBBz6Bszp8xb5TUczFL8fdpgvMOUOUjAhjRZIiVy X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9448:0:b0:2d2:3998:adaf with SMTP id o8-20020a2e9448000000b002d23998adafmr1168541ljh.32.1708787274376; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:07:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10-20020aa7c48a000000b005642258f88fsi534498edq.454.2024.02.24.07.07.54 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:07:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79717-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@Nvidia.com header.s=selector2 header.b=KWIgJFKA; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-79717-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-79717-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=nvidia.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C83441F219F6 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222954D10A; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b="KWIgJFKA" Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02on2076.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.96.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6233846448; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.96.76 ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708787208; cv=fail; b=KFWGSWeCAygsZ3diD71DvHSg6vAWR/tYIppoR/qZPg1BWCzVB56z4l54pEjiYwdxLSZQrRyUW5ghUObmVUEKuZsm6bq2FPsY/dpnlMkrymw1XzrYDJDg6lsnFJOU0bUUBk9HHir0r7xLJXSHvnvLcNT1s1MXCrxFcJK2B9EJ90w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708787208; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vtNAZRRIQ7AEBOdIlt01kJsP5/rzP1tkZGu58xPi/2o=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VBYSBBlVRcqPnowMKu6CdZcIDzxClzAyUMnPq7Dkd5KohruFoyVPBdKXFCJKo3CRBLEVlLi2LWLjKebZLRji6L6bwzDuc8CTFePT24bvbXkNdZsttkWdtdTUVUa8USPqRsyV8Bxvl1hiE9kepZ/oi5YeBmhK+td5+DRVW5Segn4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=Nvidia.com header.i=@Nvidia.com header.b=KWIgJFKA; arc=fail smtp.client-ip=40.107.96.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NDf4fv7T1lBTifRrEkxcE9lFwwsVWk/VxSSJoTn/CSyRPJiGM9bCfSc+8oPkaI8ADDwG4gphbqX1L45LAF1z6tWjxAuf3a5DkREnMdTnDMondMdPwogj2WTEipeC9X6XuVPl0gqUrL60D2wQ0LDwlk+HeOrLw/UQD4Jez5CuSb/v7BKDuZAspZewFUAmJDM38vp7F/jD04aBQ9LdeopAXej2DsgH5afoJsxQ7h9xQr6YnEf1BPO+k98qmMHNWIVvY5PAJXXr5QiGzRpJyp5hhSQ3fCxzRB+TeBf1YHfTAJlmunF6mCseH1zRHF944fBhv3erBFpyJXeaPiOkyDkSGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=TRcaF52CMEO0QVAE1H8FtXam0Yy4RMg+DZcetOMVhQ8=; b=AcEN9N4YgN9T5qBSJ+XHE76bfjdsteSDNwPWHMPb4KaB/Eez2pXCbFG7+F7lFr5AZgLyN58hZL7NFSUWHa4alnam6KQ3RfxzZPQ+6nR4ba0qDNF5gt5BvW/DdNrrSXm6oIqZPj56q5nHgXFm1JcVE1UZTTdSD1g3Rv7Sg/7vMSspK2jFe6OV0azxbyBv7LY6sCxYj/Qd5YskVwOkgIYh2UMxnlHlgqsQxKz9I4WEUul8DW5gPRUY+RR717+N/JH47LAAplReQ4utOvXyMFKvPkNY2FXqB5i8u23hrx2KRHckfv0IOocLTNxO1JequSf7Pev1BEBT8f0TnbG+KJV3yg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.117.161) smtp.rcpttodomain=kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TRcaF52CMEO0QVAE1H8FtXam0Yy4RMg+DZcetOMVhQ8=; b=KWIgJFKAjq4YPghbcHaSgnZJJjRCDw7gJ8zeBl/xNF+mXimwTgqlMeRl4LR9VfhFI3GiEswvn+FMOwPzgxiyzTi9KSeHAuytOU+SH7M6BhpRDpFv/gqXhWE82Qlo+fGUpZkiRVRr+6PQovoSkGR1hC+pEajdk0J+dwA4xy7DTYfrht68BhvCXHHTLye29174P0UHdFF0IGZNJG9+0LxE5RxaJZFAJ417EjPj1pkn4QyCTyqVm+Nh78CyDEBVcZ+QYrotoLIyv9kbaYWzk5OjUjdAabD9F+yPd6rsRS4WvFc9ihZJZ5ass3j+jXTWrWEhcX1xIUoFIFbGXNw4wL1eOw== Received: from CH2PR19CA0003.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:4d::13) by DM6PR12MB4894.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:209::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7316.24; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:06:43 +0000 Received: from DS3PEPF000099D7.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:610:4d:cafe::99) by CH2PR19CA0003.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:610:4d::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7292.48 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:06:43 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.117.161) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.117.161 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.117.161; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.117.161) by DS3PEPF000099D7.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.17.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7292.25 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:06:43 +0000 Received: from rnnvmail205.nvidia.com (10.129.68.10) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.200.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.41; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:06:26 -0800 Received: from rnnvmail203.nvidia.com (10.129.68.9) by rnnvmail205.nvidia.com (10.129.68.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.12; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:06:25 -0800 Received: from sgarnayak-dt.nvidia.com (10.127.8.9) by mail.nvidia.com (10.129.68.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1258.12 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 07:06:14 -0800 From: <ankita@nvidia.com> To: <ankita@nvidia.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>, <maz@kernel.org>, <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, <james.morse@arm.com>, <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, <reinette.chatre@intel.com>, <surenb@google.com>, <stefanha@redhat.com>, <brauner@kernel.org>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <andreyknvl@gmail.com>, <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>, <gshan@redhat.com>, <shahuang@redhat.com>, <ricarkol@google.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>, <rananta@google.com>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <david@redhat.com>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <bhe@redhat.com> CC: <aniketa@nvidia.com>, <cjia@nvidia.com>, <kwankhede@nvidia.com>, <targupta@nvidia.com>, <vsethi@nvidia.com>, <acurrid@nvidia.com>, <apopple@nvidia.com>, <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, <danw@nvidia.com>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>, <mochs@nvidia.com>, <zhiw@nvidia.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: [PATCH v9 2/4] mm: Introduce new flag to indicate wc safe Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:35:44 +0530 Message-ID: <20240224150546.368-3-ankita@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20240224150546.368-1-ankita@nvidia.com> References: <20240224150546.368-1-ankita@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-NV-OnPremToCloud: ExternallySecured X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DS3PEPF000099D7:EE_|DM6PR12MB4894:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 1a6cb5b3-b8d0-4c8f-13d7-08dc354a3645 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.117.161;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc6edge2.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230031)(36860700004)(40470700004)(46966006)(921011);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2024 15:06:43.0054 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1a6cb5b3-b8d0-4c8f-13d7-08dc354a3645 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.161];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DS3PEPF000099D7.namprd04.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6PR12MB4894 X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1791793324940297172 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1791793324940297172 |
Series |
KVM: arm64: Allow the VM to select DEVICE_* and NORMAL_NC for IO memory
|
|
Commit Message
Ankit Agrawal
Feb. 24, 2024, 3:05 p.m. UTC
From: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com> The VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED flag is implemented for ARM64, allowing KVM stage 2 device mapping attributes to use NormalNC rather than DEVICE_nGnRE, which allows guest mappings supporting write-combining attributes (WC). ARM does not architecturally guarantee this is safe, and indeed some MMIO regions like the GICv2 VCPU interface can trigger uncontained faults if NormalNC is used. Even worse, the expectation is that there are platforms where even DEVICE_nGnRE can allow uncontained faults in corner cases. Unfortunately existing ARM IP requires platform integration to take responsibility to prevent this. To safely use VFIO in KVM the platform must guarantee full safety in the guest where no action taken against a MMIO mapping can trigger an uncontained failure. The assumption is that most VFIO PCI platforms support this for both mapping types, at least in common flows, based on some expectations of how PCI IP is integrated. This can be enabled more broadly, for instance into vfio-platform drivers, but only after the platform vendor completes auditing for safety. The VMA flag VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED was found to be the simplest and cleanest way to communicate the information from VFIO to KVM that mapping the region in S2 as NormalNC is safe. KVM consumes it to activate the code that does the S2 mapping as NormalNC. Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com> --- include/linux/mm.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index f5a97dec5169..59576e56c58b 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -391,6 +391,20 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp); # define VM_UFFD_MINOR VM_NONE #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR */ +/* + * This flag is used to connect VFIO to arch specific KVM code. It + * indicates that the memory under this VMA is safe for use with any + * non-cachable memory type inside KVM. Some VFIO devices, on some + * platforms, are thought to be unsafe and can cause machine crashes + * if KVM does not lock down the memory type. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT +#define VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED_BIT 39 +#define VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED BIT(VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED_BIT) +#else +#define VM_ALLOW_ANY_UNCACHED VM_NONE +#endif + /* Bits set in the VMA until the stack is in its final location */ #define VM_STACK_INCOMPLETE_SETUP (VM_RAND_READ | VM_SEQ_READ | VM_STACK_EARLY)