[v14,13/18] irqchip/riscv-imsic: Add device MSI domain support for PCI devices

Message ID 20240222094006.1030709-14-apatel@ventanamicro.com
State New
Headers
Series Linux RISC-V AIA Support |

Commit Message

Anup Patel Feb. 22, 2024, 9:40 a.m. UTC
  The Linux PCI framework supports per-device MSI domains for PCI devices
so extend the IMSIC driver to allow PCI per-device MSI domains.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                    |  7 +++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Björn Töpel Feb. 22, 2024, 1:14 p.m. UTC | #1
Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> writes:

> The Linux PCI framework supports per-device MSI domains for PCI devices
> so extend the IMSIC driver to allow PCI per-device MSI domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                    |  7 +++++
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 85f86e31c996..2fc0cb32341a 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -553,6 +553,13 @@ config RISCV_IMSIC
>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR
>  	select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
>  
> +config RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
> +	bool
> +	depends on RISCV_IMSIC
> +	depends on PCI
> +	depends on PCI_MSI
> +	default RISCV_IMSIC
> +
>  config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER
>  	bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" if COMPILE_TEST
>  	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
> index e2344fc08dca..90ddcdd0bba5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/msi.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
> @@ -208,6 +209,28 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops imsic_base_domain_ops = {
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
> +
> +static void imsic_pci_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
> +	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void imsic_pci_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
> +	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
> +}
> +
> +#define MATCH_PCI_MSI		BIT(DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI)
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define MATCH_PCI_MSI		0
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
>  				    struct irq_domain *domain,
>  				    struct irq_domain *real_parent,
> @@ -231,6 +254,13 @@ static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	/* Is the target supported? */
>  	switch (info->bus_token) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
> +	case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSI:
> +	case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSIX:
> +		info->chip->irq_mask = imsic_pci_mask_irq;
> +		info->chip->irq_unmask = imsic_pci_unmask_irq;

irq_set_affinity()?


Björn
  
Anup Patel Feb. 22, 2024, 1:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:44 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernelorg> wrote:
>
> Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> writes:
>
> > The Linux PCI framework supports per-device MSI domains for PCI devices
> > so extend the IMSIC driver to allow PCI per-device MSI domains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                    |  7 +++++
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > index 85f86e31c996..2fc0cb32341a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> > @@ -553,6 +553,13 @@ config RISCV_IMSIC
> >       select GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR
> >       select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
> >
> > +config RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
> > +     bool
> > +     depends on RISCV_IMSIC
> > +     depends on PCI
> > +     depends on PCI_MSI
> > +     default RISCV_IMSIC
> > +
> >  config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER
> >       bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" if COMPILE_TEST
> >       depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
> > index e2344fc08dca..90ddcdd0bba5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/msi.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/smp.h>
> > @@ -208,6 +209,28 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops imsic_base_domain_ops = {
> >  #endif
> >  };
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
> > +
> > +static void imsic_pci_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > +     pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
> > +     irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void imsic_pci_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> > +{
> > +     irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
> > +     pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define MATCH_PCI_MSI                BIT(DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI)
> > +
> > +#else
> > +
> > +#define MATCH_PCI_MSI                0
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
> >                                   struct irq_domain *domain,
> >                                   struct irq_domain *real_parent,
> > @@ -231,6 +254,13 @@ static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
> >
> >       /* Is the target supported? */
> >       switch (info->bus_token) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
> > +     case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSI:
> > +     case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSIX:
> > +             info->chip->irq_mask = imsic_pci_mask_irq;
> > +             info->chip->irq_unmask = imsic_pci_unmask_irq;
>
> irq_set_affinity()?

It's already set by the switch-case above.

Regards,
Anup
  
Björn Töpel Feb. 22, 2024, 2:05 p.m. UTC | #3
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:44 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> writes:
>>
>> > The Linux PCI framework supports per-device MSI domains for PCI devices
>> > so extend the IMSIC driver to allow PCI per-device MSI domains.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                    |  7 +++++
>> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> >  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>> > index 85f86e31c996..2fc0cb32341a 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>> > @@ -553,6 +553,13 @@ config RISCV_IMSIC
>> >       select GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR
>> >       select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
>> >
>> > +config RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
>> > +     bool
>> > +     depends on RISCV_IMSIC
>> > +     depends on PCI
>> > +     depends on PCI_MSI
>> > +     default RISCV_IMSIC
>> > +
>> >  config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER
>> >       bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" if COMPILE_TEST
>> >       depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST
>> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
>> > index e2344fc08dca..90ddcdd0bba5 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
>> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>> >  #include <linux/module.h>
>> >  #include <linux/msi.h>
>> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>> >  #include <linux/smp.h>
>> > @@ -208,6 +209,28 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops imsic_base_domain_ops = {
>> >  #endif
>> >  };
>> >
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
>> > +
>> > +static void imsic_pci_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> > +{
>> > +     pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
>> > +     irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void imsic_pci_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>> > +{
>> > +     irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
>> > +     pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +#define MATCH_PCI_MSI                BIT(DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI)
>> > +
>> > +#else
>> > +
>> > +#define MATCH_PCI_MSI                0
>> > +
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> >  static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
>> >                                   struct irq_domain *domain,
>> >                                   struct irq_domain *real_parent,
>> > @@ -231,6 +254,13 @@ static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
>> >
>> >       /* Is the target supported? */
>> >       switch (info->bus_token) {
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
>> > +     case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSI:
>> > +     case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSIX:
>> > +             info->chip->irq_mask = imsic_pci_mask_irq;
>> > +             info->chip->irq_unmask = imsic_pci_unmask_irq;
>>
>> irq_set_affinity()?
>
> It's already set by the switch-case above.

Ah, right -- the new .bus_select_token! Thank you!
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 85f86e31c996..2fc0cb32341a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -553,6 +553,13 @@  config RISCV_IMSIC
 	select GENERIC_IRQ_MATRIX_ALLOCATOR
 	select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ
 
+config RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
+	bool
+	depends on RISCV_IMSIC
+	depends on PCI
+	depends on PCI_MSI
+	default RISCV_IMSIC
+
 config EXYNOS_IRQ_COMBINER
 	bool "Samsung Exynos IRQ combiner support" if COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on (ARCH_EXYNOS && ARM) || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
index e2344fc08dca..90ddcdd0bba5 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-imsic-platform.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/msi.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
@@ -208,6 +209,28 @@  static const struct irq_domain_ops imsic_base_domain_ops = {
 #endif
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
+
+static void imsic_pci_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
+	irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void imsic_pci_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
+	pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
+}
+
+#define MATCH_PCI_MSI		BIT(DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI)
+
+#else
+
+#define MATCH_PCI_MSI		0
+
+#endif
+
 static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
 				    struct irq_domain *domain,
 				    struct irq_domain *real_parent,
@@ -231,6 +254,13 @@  static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
 
 	/* Is the target supported? */
 	switch (info->bus_token) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_IMSIC_PCI
+	case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSI:
+	case DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_MSIX:
+		info->chip->irq_mask = imsic_pci_mask_irq;
+		info->chip->irq_unmask = imsic_pci_unmask_irq;
+		break;
+#endif
 	case DOMAIN_BUS_DEVICE_MSI:
 		/*
 		 * Per-device MSI should never have any MSI feature bits
@@ -270,11 +300,12 @@  static bool imsic_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev,
 #define MATCH_PLATFORM_MSI		BIT(DOMAIN_BUS_PLATFORM_MSI)
 
 static const struct msi_parent_ops imsic_msi_parent_ops = {
-	.supported_flags	= MSI_GENERIC_FLAGS_MASK,
+	.supported_flags	= MSI_GENERIC_FLAGS_MASK |
+				  MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX,
 	.required_flags		= MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |
 				  MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS,
 	.bus_select_token	= DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS,
-	.bus_select_mask	= MATCH_PLATFORM_MSI,
+	.bus_select_mask	= MATCH_PCI_MSI | MATCH_PLATFORM_MSI,
 	.init_dev_msi_info	= imsic_init_dev_msi_info,
 };