diff mbox series

[v11,08/20] timers: Ease code in run_local_timers()

Message ID 20240221090548.36600-9-anna-maria@linutronix.de
State New
Headers
Series timers: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model |

Commit Message

Anna-Maria Behnsen Feb. 21, 2024, 9:05 a.m. UTC 
  The logic for raising a softirq the way it is implemented right now, is
readable for two timer bases. When increasing numbers of timer bases, code
gets harder to read. With the introduction of the timer migration
hierarchy, there will be three timer bases.

Therefore ease the code. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
v5: New patch to decrease patch size of follow up patches
---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index fc4c406c9ec7..793848167852 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -2135,16 +2135,14 @@  static void run_local_timers(void)
 	struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_STD]);
 
 	hrtimer_run_queues();
-	/* Raise the softirq only if required. */
-	if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
-		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON))
-			return;
-		/* CPU is awake, so check the deferrable base. */
-		base++;
-		if (time_before(jiffies, base->next_expiry))
+
+	for (int i = 0; i < NR_BASES; i++, base++) {
+		/* Raise the softirq only if required. */
+		if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->next_expiry)) {
+			raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
 			return;
+		}
 	}
-	raise_softirq(TIMER_SOFTIRQ);
 }
 
 /*