diff mbox series

[02/17] workqueue: Use rcu_read_lock_any_held() instead of rcu_read_lock_held()

Message ID 20240216180559.208276-3-tj@kernel.org
State New
Headers
Series [01/17] workqueue: Cosmetic changes |

Commit Message

Tejun Heo Feb. 16, 2024, 6:04 p.m. UTC 
  The different flavors of RCU read critical sections have been unified. Let's
update the locking assertion macros accordingly to avoid requiring
unnecessary explicit rcu_read_[un]lock() calls.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index b280caf81fb2..87750e70b638 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -515,12 +515,12 @@  static void show_one_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool);
 #include <trace/events/workqueue.h>
 
 #define assert_rcu_or_pool_mutex()					\
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&			\
+	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held() &&			\
 			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex),		\
 			 "RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
 
 #define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq)			\
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held() &&			\
+	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held() &&			\
 			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) &&		\
 			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex),		\
 			 "RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")