[net-next,v1,1/1] wireless: Add KHZ_PER_GHZ to units.h and reuse
Commit Message
The KHZ_PER_GHZ might be used by others (with the name aligned
with similar constants). Define it in units.h and convert
wireless to use it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
include/linux/units.h | 5 ++++-
net/wireless/reg.c | 7 +++----
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Comments
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
> The KHZ_PER_GHZ might be used by others (with the name aligned
> with similar constants). Define it in units.h and convert
> wireless to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/units.h | 5 ++++-
> net/wireless/reg.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
wireless patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. But no need resend
because of this.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 05:41:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The KHZ_PER_GHZ might be used by others (with the name aligned
> with similar constants). Define it in units.h and convert
> wireless to use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
>
> > The KHZ_PER_GHZ might be used by others (with the name aligned
> > with similar constants). Define it in units.h and convert
> > wireless to use it.
> wireless patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. But no need resend
> because of this.
Aha, thanks. Note, I still don't see it in wireless-next tree. Is everything
on track?
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:23:06PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
>>
>> > The KHZ_PER_GHZ might be used by others (with the name aligned
>> > with similar constants). Define it in units.h and convert
>> > wireless to use it.
>
>> wireless patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. But no need resend
>> because of this.
>
> Aha, thanks. Note, I still don't see it in wireless-next tree. Is everything
> on track?
Yes, it's queued in patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20240215154136.630029-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
@@ -24,10 +24,13 @@
#define NANOHZ_PER_HZ 1000000000UL
#define MICROHZ_PER_HZ 1000000UL
#define MILLIHZ_PER_HZ 1000UL
+
#define HZ_PER_KHZ 1000UL
-#define KHZ_PER_MHZ 1000UL
#define HZ_PER_MHZ 1000000UL
+#define KHZ_PER_MHZ 1000UL
+#define KHZ_PER_GHZ 1000000UL
+
#define MILLIWATT_PER_WATT 1000UL
#define MICROWATT_PER_MILLIWATT 1000UL
#define MICROWATT_PER_WATT 1000000UL
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
#include <linux/verification.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
+
#include <net/cfg80211.h>
#include "core.h"
#include "reg.h"
@@ -1289,20 +1291,17 @@ static bool is_valid_rd(const struct ieee80211_regdomain *rd)
static bool freq_in_rule_band(const struct ieee80211_freq_range *freq_range,
u32 freq_khz)
{
-#define ONE_GHZ_IN_KHZ 1000000
/*
* From 802.11ad: directional multi-gigabit (DMG):
* Pertaining to operation in a frequency band containing a channel
* with the Channel starting frequency above 45 GHz.
*/
- u32 limit = freq_khz > 45 * ONE_GHZ_IN_KHZ ?
- 20 * ONE_GHZ_IN_KHZ : 2 * ONE_GHZ_IN_KHZ;
+ u32 limit = freq_khz > 45 * KHZ_PER_GHZ ? 20 * KHZ_PER_GHZ : 2 * KHZ_PER_GHZ;
if (abs(freq_khz - freq_range->start_freq_khz) <= limit)
return true;
if (abs(freq_khz - freq_range->end_freq_khz) <= limit)
return true;
return false;
-#undef ONE_GHZ_IN_KHZ
}
/*