kbuild: Use -fmin-function-alignment when available
Commit Message
GCC recently added option -fmin-function-alignment, which should appear
in GCC 14. Unlike -falign-functions, this option causes all functions to
be aligned at the specified value, including the cold ones.
Detect availability of -fmin-function-alignment and use it instead of
-falign-functions when present. Introduce CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
and make the workarounds for the broken function alignment conditional
on this setting.
Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
---
Makefile | 7 ++++++-
arch/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
include/linux/compiler_types.h | 10 +++++-----
kernel/exit.c | 5 ++++-
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
base-commit: 841c35169323cd833294798e58b9bf63fa4fa1de
Comments
Hi Petr,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> GCC recently added option -fmin-function-alignment, which should appear
> in GCC 14. Unlike -falign-functions, this option causes all functions to
> be aligned at the specified value, including the cold ones.
>
> Detect availability of -fmin-function-alignment and use it instead of
> -falign-functions when present. Introduce CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> and make the workarounds for the broken function alignment conditional
> on this setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 7 ++++++-
> arch/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/compiler_types.h | 10 +++++-----
> kernel/exit.c | 5 ++++-
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 7e0b2ad98905..9516e43f6e45 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -974,7 +974,12 @@ export CC_FLAGS_CFI
> endif
>
> ifneq ($(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT),0)
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
> +# Set the minimal function alignment. Try to use the newer GCC option
> +# -fmin-function-alignment, or fall back to -falign-funtions. See also
> +# CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT.
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, \
> + -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT), \
> + -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT))
> endif
>
> # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index a5af0edd3eb8..e2448f927fae 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -1507,4 +1507,12 @@ config FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> default 4 if FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
> default 0
>
> +config CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> + # Detect availability of the GCC option -fmin-function-alignment which
> + # guarantees minimal alignment for all functions. GCC 13 and older have
> + # only -falign-functions which the compiler ignores for cold functions
> + # and this hence requires extra care in the kernel. Clang provides
> + # strict alignment always when using -falign-functions.
> + def_bool $(cc-option, -fmin-function-alignment=8) || CC_IS_CLANG
> +
I think this configuration should be split into something like
CONFIG_CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT that has the cc-option check then
CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT can depend on that configuration
or Clang as you have it here, so that we can drop the cc-option check in
the main Makefile and have it be:
ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
else
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
endif
It is wasteful to call cc-option twice in my opinion, especially if we
are checking it in Kconfig.
> endmenu
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> index 663d8791c871..f0152165e83c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
> @@ -99,17 +99,17 @@ static inline void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *ptr) { }
> * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Label-Attributes.html#index-cold-label-attribute
> *
> * When -falign-functions=N is in use, we must avoid the cold attribute as
> - * contemporary versions of GCC drop the alignment for cold functions. Worse,
> - * GCC can implicitly mark callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so
> - * it's not sufficient to add __function_aligned here as that will not ensure
> - * that callees are correctly aligned.
> + * GCC drops the alignment for cold functions. Worse, GCC can implicitly mark
> + * callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so it's not sufficient to add
> + * __function_aligned here as that will not ensure that callees are correctly
> + * aligned.
> *
> * See:
> *
> * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y77%2FqVgvaJidFpYt@FVFF77S0Q05N
> * https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c9
> */
> -#if !defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
> #define __cold __attribute__((__cold__))
> #else
> #define __cold
> diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
> index dfb963d2f862..5a6fed4ad3df 100644
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -1920,7 +1920,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(thread_group_exited);
> *
> * See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c11
> */
> -__weak __function_aligned void abort(void)
> +#ifndef CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> +__function_aligned
> +#endif
> +__weak void abort(void)
> {
> BUG();
>
>
> base-commit: 841c35169323cd833294798e58b9bf63fa4fa1de
> --
> 2.35.3
>
On 2/13/24 01:27, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 03:53:55PM +0100, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>> GCC recently added option -fmin-function-alignment, which should appear
>> in GCC 14. Unlike -falign-functions, this option causes all functions to
>> be aligned at the specified value, including the cold ones.
>>
>> Detect availability of -fmin-function-alignment and use it instead of
>> -falign-functions when present. Introduce CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
>> and make the workarounds for the broken function alignment conditional
>> on this setting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>
>> ---
>> Makefile | 7 ++++++-
>> arch/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
>> include/linux/compiler_types.h | 10 +++++-----
>> kernel/exit.c | 5 ++++-
>> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index 7e0b2ad98905..9516e43f6e45 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -974,7 +974,12 @@ export CC_FLAGS_CFI
>> endif
>>
>> ifneq ($(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT),0)
>> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
>> +# Set the minimal function alignment. Try to use the newer GCC option
>> +# -fmin-function-alignment, or fall back to -falign-funtions. See also
>> +# CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT.
>> +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, \
>> + -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT), \
>> + -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT))
>> endif
>>
>> # arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
>> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
>> index a5af0edd3eb8..e2448f927fae 100644
>> --- a/arch/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
>> @@ -1507,4 +1507,12 @@ config FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
>> default 4 if FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
>> default 0
>>
>> +config CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
>> + # Detect availability of the GCC option -fmin-function-alignment which
>> + # guarantees minimal alignment for all functions. GCC 13 and older have
>> + # only -falign-functions which the compiler ignores for cold functions
>> + # and this hence requires extra care in the kernel. Clang provides
>> + # strict alignment always when using -falign-functions.
>> + def_bool $(cc-option, -fmin-function-alignment=8) || CC_IS_CLANG
>> +
>
> I think this configuration should be split into something like
> CONFIG_CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT that has the cc-option check then
> CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT can depend on that configuration
> or Clang as you have it here, so that we can drop the cc-option check in
> the main Makefile and have it be:
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_HAS_MIN_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
> else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
> endif
>
> It is wasteful to call cc-option twice in my opinion, especially if we
> are checking it in Kconfig.
Makes sense, thanks.
-- Petr
@@ -974,7 +974,12 @@ export CC_FLAGS_CFI
endif
ifneq ($(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT),0)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
+# Set the minimal function alignment. Try to use the newer GCC option
+# -fmin-function-alignment, or fall back to -falign-funtions. See also
+# CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT.
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, \
+ -fmin-function-alignment=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT), \
+ -falign-functions=$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT))
endif
# arch Makefile may override CC so keep this after arch Makefile is included
@@ -1507,4 +1507,12 @@ config FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
default 4 if FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT_4B
default 0
+config CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
+ # Detect availability of the GCC option -fmin-function-alignment which
+ # guarantees minimal alignment for all functions. GCC 13 and older have
+ # only -falign-functions which the compiler ignores for cold functions
+ # and this hence requires extra care in the kernel. Clang provides
+ # strict alignment always when using -falign-functions.
+ def_bool $(cc-option, -fmin-function-alignment=8) || CC_IS_CLANG
+
endmenu
@@ -99,17 +99,17 @@ static inline void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *ptr) { }
* gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Label-Attributes.html#index-cold-label-attribute
*
* When -falign-functions=N is in use, we must avoid the cold attribute as
- * contemporary versions of GCC drop the alignment for cold functions. Worse,
- * GCC can implicitly mark callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so
- * it's not sufficient to add __function_aligned here as that will not ensure
- * that callees are correctly aligned.
+ * GCC drops the alignment for cold functions. Worse, GCC can implicitly mark
+ * callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so it's not sufficient to add
+ * __function_aligned here as that will not ensure that callees are correctly
+ * aligned.
*
* See:
*
* https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y77%2FqVgvaJidFpYt@FVFF77S0Q05N
* https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c9
*/
-#if !defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
+#if defined(CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
#define __cold __attribute__((__cold__))
#else
#define __cold
@@ -1920,7 +1920,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(thread_group_exited);
*
* See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c11
*/
-__weak __function_aligned void abort(void)
+#ifndef CONFIG_CC_HAS_SANE_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT
+__function_aligned
+#endif
+__weak void abort(void)
{
BUG();