[v3] perf: CXL: fix mismatched cpmu event opcode

Message ID 20240208013415epcms2p2904187c8a863f4d0d2adc980fb91a2dc@epcms2p2
State New
Headers
Series [v3] perf: CXL: fix mismatched cpmu event opcode |

Commit Message

Hojin Nam Feb. 8, 2024, 1:34 a.m. UTC
  S2M NDR BI-ConflictAck opcode is described as 4 in the CXL
r3.0 3.3.9 Table 3.43. However, it is defined as 3 in macro definition.

Fixes: 5d7107c72796 ("perf: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver")
Signed-off-by: Hojin Nam <hj96.nam@samsung.com>
---

Hi Jonathan,
Sorry, I misunderstood your guide. 
I roll-backed to v1 patch keeping fixes tag. Thank you!

Changes since v2:
- Remove s2m_ndr_cmpm attribute and referecne added at v2 (Jonathan)

Changes since v1:
- Add s2m_ndr_cmpm event attribute
- Add fixes tag (Jonathan)


 drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.34.1
  

Comments

Jonathan Cameron Feb. 8, 2024, 10:10 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:34:15 +0900
Hojin Nam <hj96.nam@samsung.com> wrote:

> S2M NDR BI-ConflictAck opcode is described as 4 in the CXL
> r3.0 3.3.9 Table 3.43. However, it is defined as 3 in macro definition.
> 
> Fixes: 5d7107c72796 ("perf: CXL Performance Monitoring Unit driver")
> Signed-off-by: Hojin Nam <hj96.nam@samsung.com>

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> Sorry, I misunderstood your guide. 
> I roll-backed to v1 patch keeping fixes tag. Thank you!
> 
> Changes since v2:
> - Remove s2m_ndr_cmpm attribute and referecne added at v2 (Jonathan)
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Add s2m_ndr_cmpm event attribute
> - Add fixes tag (Jonathan)
> 
> 
>  drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> index 365d964b0f6a..bc0d414a6aff 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static struct attribute *cxl_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
>         CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmp,                     CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(0)),
>         CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmps,                    CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(1)),
>         CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmpe,                    CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(2)),
> -       CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_biconflictack,           CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(3)),
> +       CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_biconflictack,           CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(4)),
>         /* CXL rev 3.0 Table 3-46 S2M DRS opcodes */
>         CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_drs_memdata,                 CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_DRS, BIT(0)),
>         CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_drs_memdatanxm,              CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_DRS, BIT(1)),
> --
> 2.34.1
  
Will Deacon Feb. 9, 2024, 6:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:34:15 +0900, Hojin Nam wrote:
> S2M NDR BI-ConflictAck opcode is described as 4 in the CXL
> r3.0 3.3.9 Table 3.43. However, it is defined as 3 in macro definition.
> 
> 

Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!

[1/1] perf: CXL: fix mismatched cpmu event opcode
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/719da04f2d12

Cheers,
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
index 365d964b0f6a..bc0d414a6aff 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@  static struct attribute *cxl_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
        CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmp,                     CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(0)),
        CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmps,                    CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(1)),
        CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_cmpe,                    CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(2)),
-       CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_biconflictack,           CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(3)),
+       CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_ndr_biconflictack,           CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_NDR, BIT(4)),
        /* CXL rev 3.0 Table 3-46 S2M DRS opcodes */
        CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_drs_memdata,                 CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_DRS, BIT(0)),
        CXL_PMU_EVENT_CXL_ATTR(s2m_drs_memdatanxm,              CXL_PMU_GID_S2M_DRS, BIT(1)),