[7/8] net: intel: igb: Use linkmode helpers for EEE
Commit Message
Make use of the existing linkmode helpers for converting PHY EEE
register values into links modes, now that ethtool_keee uses link
modes, rather than u32 values.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ethtool.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Comments
Hello Andrew,
On Sun, 04 Feb 2024 17:40:24 -0600
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> Make use of the existing linkmode helpers for converting PHY EEE
> register values into links modes, now that ethtool_keee uses link
> modes, rather than u32 values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
[...]
> @@ -3109,6 +3111,8 @@ static int igb_set_eee(struct net_device *netdev,
> struct ethtool_keee *edata)
> {
> struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(supported) = {};
> + __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(tmp) = {};
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> struct ethtool_keee eee_curr;
> bool adv1g_eee = true, adv100m_eee = true;
> @@ -3138,14 +3142,21 @@ static int igb_set_eee(struct net_device *netdev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (!edata->advertised_u32 || (edata->advertised_u32 &
> - ~(ADVERTISE_100_FULL | ADVERTISE_1000_FULL))) {
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT,
> + supported);
> + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
> + supported);
> + if (linkmode_andnot(tmp, edata->advertised, supported)) {
> dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> "EEE Advertisement supports only 100Tx and/or 100T full duplex\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - adv100m_eee = !!(edata->advertised_u32 & ADVERTISE_100_FULL);
> - adv1g_eee = !!(edata->advertised_u32 & ADVERTISE_1000_FULL);
> + adv100m_eee = linkmode_test_bit(
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
> + edata->advertised);
> + adv1g_eee = linkmode_test_bit(
> + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
Probably a typo, I think it should be ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT
here :)
> + edata->advertised);
>
> } else if (!edata->eee_enabled) {
> dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> @@ -3153,7 +3164,7 @@ static int igb_set_eee(struct net_device *netdev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - adapter->eee_advert = ethtool_adv_to_mmd_eee_adv_t(edata->advertised_u32);
> + adapter->eee_advert = linkmode_to_mii_eee_cap1_t(edata->advertised);
> if (hw->dev_spec._82575.eee_disable != !edata->eee_enabled) {
> hw->dev_spec._82575.eee_disable = !edata->eee_enabled;
> adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_EEE;
>
Thanks,
Maxime
> > - adv100m_eee = !!(edata->advertised_u32 & ADVERTISE_100_FULL);
> > - adv1g_eee = !!(edata->advertised_u32 & ADVERTISE_1000_FULL);
> > + adv100m_eee = linkmode_test_bit(
> > + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
> > + edata->advertised);
> > + adv1g_eee = linkmode_test_bit(
> > + ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
>
> Probably a typo, I think it should be ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT
> here :)
Yes, good catch. Thanks.
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
@@ -3038,11 +3038,13 @@ static int igb_get_eee(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_keee *edata)
(hw->phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- edata->supported_u32 = (SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
- SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full);
+ linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT,
+ edata->supported);
+ linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
+ edata->supported);
if (!hw->dev_spec._82575.eee_disable)
- edata->advertised_u32 =
- mmd_eee_adv_to_ethtool_adv_t(adapter->eee_advert);
+ mii_eee_cap1_mod_linkmode_t(edata->advertised,
+ adapter->eee_advert);
/* The IPCNFG and EEER registers are not supported on I354. */
if (hw->mac.type == e1000_i354) {
@@ -3068,7 +3070,7 @@ static int igb_get_eee(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_keee *edata)
if (ret_val)
return -ENODATA;
- edata->lp_advertised_u32 = mmd_eee_adv_to_ethtool_adv_t(phy_data);
+ mii_eee_cap1_mod_linkmode_t(edata->lp_advertised, phy_data);
break;
case e1000_i354:
case e1000_i210:
@@ -3099,7 +3101,7 @@ static int igb_get_eee(struct net_device *netdev, struct ethtool_keee *edata)
edata->eee_enabled = false;
edata->eee_active = false;
edata->tx_lpi_enabled = false;
- edata->advertised_u32 &= ~edata->advertised_u32;
+ linkmode_zero(edata->advertised);
}
return 0;
@@ -3109,6 +3111,8 @@ static int igb_set_eee(struct net_device *netdev,
struct ethtool_keee *edata)
{
struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(supported) = {};
+ __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(tmp) = {};
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
struct ethtool_keee eee_curr;
bool adv1g_eee = true, adv100m_eee = true;
@@ -3138,14 +3142,21 @@ static int igb_set_eee(struct net_device *netdev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!edata->advertised_u32 || (edata->advertised_u32 &
- ~(ADVERTISE_100_FULL | ADVERTISE_1000_FULL))) {
+ linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT,
+ supported);
+ linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
+ supported);
+ if (linkmode_andnot(tmp, edata->advertised, supported)) {
dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
"EEE Advertisement supports only 100Tx and/or 100T full duplex\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- adv100m_eee = !!(edata->advertised_u32 & ADVERTISE_100_FULL);
- adv1g_eee = !!(edata->advertised_u32 & ADVERTISE_1000_FULL);
+ adv100m_eee = linkmode_test_bit(
+ ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
+ edata->advertised);
+ adv1g_eee = linkmode_test_bit(
+ ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT,
+ edata->advertised);
} else if (!edata->eee_enabled) {
dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev,
@@ -3153,7 +3164,7 @@ static int igb_set_eee(struct net_device *netdev,
return -EINVAL;
}
- adapter->eee_advert = ethtool_adv_to_mmd_eee_adv_t(edata->advertised_u32);
+ adapter->eee_advert = linkmode_to_mii_eee_cap1_t(edata->advertised);
if (hw->dev_spec._82575.eee_disable != !edata->eee_enabled) {
hw->dev_spec._82575.eee_disable = !edata->eee_enabled;
adapter->flags |= IGB_FLAG_EEE;