[1/1] Modify macro NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to define a type using typedef
Commit Message
From: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
Modify NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to netlbl_catmap_map_t, which is more
readable.
Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
---
include/net/netlabel.h | 8 ++++----
net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:45 PM George Guo <dongtai.guo@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
>
> Modify NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to netlbl_catmap_map_t, which is more
> readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Guo <guodongtai@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> include/net/netlabel.h | 8 ++++----
> net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
I'm generally not in favor of minor rename patches like this unless
they are part of a larger effort (code churn with little benefit).
I'm not going to block it if the netdev folks want to merge this, but
I can't say I really support it either.
--
paul-moore.com
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 10:31:37 -0500 Paul Moore wrote:
> > Modify NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE to netlbl_catmap_map_t, which is more
> > readable.
>
> I'm generally not in favor of minor rename patches like this unless
> they are part of a larger effort (code churn with little benefit).
> I'm not going to block it if the netdev folks want to merge this, but
> I can't say I really support it either.
FWIW the netdev (or should I say my?) policy is also "don't take it
unless explicitly acked by the area maintainer". Looking at the patch
I'm not sure why the typedef at all, not just use u64? So whatever,
I'm tossing this from pw. Not worth expending brain cycles over.
@@ -145,15 +145,15 @@ struct netlbl_lsm_cache {
* processing.
*
*/
-#define NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE u64
+typedef u64 netlbl_catmap_map_t;
#define NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPCNT 4
-#define NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPSIZE (sizeof(NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE) * 8)
+#define NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPSIZE (sizeof(netlbl_catmap_map_t) * 8)
#define NETLBL_CATMAP_SIZE (NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPSIZE * \
NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPCNT)
-#define NETLBL_CATMAP_BIT (NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE)0x01
+#define NETLBL_CATMAP_BIT ((netlbl_catmap_map_t)0x01)
struct netlbl_lsm_catmap {
u32 startbit;
- NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE bitmap[NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPCNT];
+ netlbl_catmap_map_t bitmap[NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPCNT];
struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *next;
};
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ int netlbl_catmap_walk(struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *catmap, u32 offset)
struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *iter;
u32 idx;
u32 bit;
- NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE bitmap;
+ netlbl_catmap_map_t bitmap;
iter = _netlbl_catmap_getnode(&catmap, offset, _CM_F_WALK, 0);
if (iter == NULL)
@@ -666,8 +666,8 @@ int netlbl_catmap_walkrng(struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *catmap, u32 offset)
struct netlbl_lsm_catmap *prev = NULL;
u32 idx;
u32 bit;
- NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE bitmask;
- NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE bitmap;
+ netlbl_catmap_map_t bitmask;
+ netlbl_catmap_map_t bitmap;
iter = _netlbl_catmap_getnode(&catmap, offset, _CM_F_WALK, 0);
if (iter == NULL)
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ int netlbl_catmap_setlong(struct netlbl_lsm_catmap **catmap,
offset -= iter->startbit;
idx = offset / NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPSIZE;
- iter->bitmap[idx] |= (NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPTYPE)bitmap
+ iter->bitmap[idx] |= (netlbl_catmap_map_t)bitmap
<< (offset % NETLBL_CATMAP_MAPSIZE);
return 0;