[v5,2/6] serial: 8250: Support separate rs485 rx-enable GPIO

Message ID 20240126-dev-rx-enable-v5-2-5d934eda05ca@theobroma-systems.com
State New
Headers
Series serial: 8250: Add support for rs485 half/full duplex on puma/ringneck-haikou |

Commit Message

Farouk Bouabid Jan. 26, 2024, 5:27 p.m. UTC
  From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>

The RE signal is used to control the duplex mode of transmissions,
aka receiving data while sending in full duplex mode, while stopping
receiving data in half-duplex mode.

On a number of boards the !RE signal is tied to ground so reception
is always enabled except if the UART allows disabling the receiver.
This can be taken advantage of to implement half-duplex mode - like
done on 8250_bcm2835aux.

Another solution is to tie !RE to RTS always forcing half-duplex mode.

And finally there is the option to control the RE signal separately,
like done here by introducing a new rs485-specific gpio that can be
set depending on the RX_DURING_TX setting in the common em485 callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
Signed-off-by: Farouk Bouabid <farouk.bouabid@theobroma-systems.com>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 7 ++++++-
 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c    | 7 +++++++
 include/linux/serial_core.h         | 1 +
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Farouk Bouabid Jan. 29, 2024, 8:57 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 26.01.24 20:58, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from linosanfilippo@gmx.de. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> Hi,
>
> On 26.01.24 18:27, Farouk Bouabid wrote:
>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
>>
>> The RE signal is used to control the duplex mode of transmissions,
>> aka receiving data while sending in full duplex mode, while stopping
>> receiving data in half-duplex mode.
>>
>> On a number of boards the !RE signal is tied to ground so reception
>> is always enabled except if the UART allows disabling the receiver.
>> This can be taken advantage of to implement half-duplex mode - like
>> done on 8250_bcm2835aux.
>>
>> Another solution is to tie !RE to RTS always forcing half-duplex mode.
>>
>> And finally there is the option to control the RE signal separately,
>> like done here by introducing a new rs485-specific gpio that can be
>> set depending on the RX_DURING_TX setting in the common em485 callbacks.
>>
> we just added the rx_during_tx_gpio to the serial core.
> Why cant you use this GPIO for your purpose?
>
> Regards,
> Lino.
What we are trying to implement is a gpio that emulates the RTS signal 
itself as we do not have a dedicated RTS signal that can be controlled 
through MCR. The rx during tx state in our case is a fixed state of 
"NO_RX_WHILE_TX"

Regards,

>
  
Christoph Niedermaier Jan. 30, 2024, 12:29 p.m. UTC | #2
From: Farouk Bouabid
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 9:57 AM

Hi,

> On 26.01.24 20:58, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from linosanfilippo@gmx.de. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 26.01.24 18:27, Farouk Bouabid wrote:
>>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
>>>
>>> The RE signal is used to control the duplex mode of transmissions,
>>> aka receiving data while sending in full duplex mode, while stopping
>>> receiving data in half-duplex mode.
>>>
>>> On a number of boards the !RE signal is tied to ground so reception
>>> is always enabled except if the UART allows disabling the receiver.
>>> This can be taken advantage of to implement half-duplex mode - like
>>> done on 8250_bcm2835aux.
>>>
>>> Another solution is to tie !RE to RTS always forcing half-duplex mode.
>>>
>>> And finally there is the option to control the RE signal separately,
>>> like done here by introducing a new rs485-specific gpio that can be
>>> set depending on the RX_DURING_TX setting in the common em485 callbacks.
>>>
>> we just added the rx_during_tx_gpio to the serial core.
>> Why cant you use this GPIO for your purpose?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Lino.
> What we are trying to implement is a gpio that emulates the RTS signal
> itself as we do not have a dedicated RTS signal that can be controlled
> through MCR. The rx during tx state in our case is a fixed state of
> "NO_RX_WHILE_TX"

Why can't the property rts-gpios be used here for this purpose?


Regards
Christoph
  
Farouk Bouabid Feb. 8, 2024, 3:46 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Christoph,


On 30.01.24 13:29, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> [Einige Personen, die diese Nachricht erhalten haben, erhalten häufig keine E-Mails von cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com. Weitere Informationen, warum dies wichtig ist, finden Sie unter https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> From: Farouk Bouabid
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 9:57 AM
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 26.01.24 20:58, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from linosanfilippo@gmx.de. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 26.01.24 18:27, Farouk Bouabid wrote:
>>>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>
>>>>
>>>> The RE signal is used to control the duplex mode of transmissions,
>>>> aka receiving data while sending in full duplex mode, while stopping
>>>> receiving data in half-duplex mode.
>>>>
>>>> On a number of boards the !RE signal is tied to ground so reception
>>>> is always enabled except if the UART allows disabling the receiver.
>>>> This can be taken advantage of to implement half-duplex mode - like
>>>> done on 8250_bcm2835aux.
>>>>
>>>> Another solution is to tie !RE to RTS always forcing half-duplex mode.
>>>>
>>>> And finally there is the option to control the RE signal separately,
>>>> like done here by introducing a new rs485-specific gpio that can be
>>>> set depending on the RX_DURING_TX setting in the common em485 callbacks.
>>>>
>>> we just added the rx_during_tx_gpio to the serial core.
>>> Why cant you use this GPIO for your purpose?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Lino.
>> What we are trying to implement is a gpio that emulates the RTS signal
>> itself as we do not have a dedicated RTS signal that can be controlled
>> through MCR. The rx during tx state in our case is a fixed state of
>> "NO_RX_WHILE_TX"
> Why can't the property rts-gpios be used here for this purpose?


Yes that indeed serves our purpose. Thank you for the suggestion.


Regards

Farouk

>
>
> Regards
> Christoph
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
index 8ca061d3bbb9..54d8f809b81e 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c
@@ -1402,6 +1402,7 @@  static void serial8250_stop_rx(struct uart_port *port)
 void serial8250_em485_stop_tx(struct uart_8250_port *p)
 {
 	unsigned char mcr = serial8250_in_MCR(p);
+	struct uart_port *port = &p->port;
 
 	/* Port locked to synchronize UART_IER access against the console. */
 	lockdep_assert_held_once(&p->port.lock);
@@ -1418,6 +1419,7 @@  void serial8250_em485_stop_tx(struct uart_8250_port *p)
 	 * Enable previously disabled RX interrupts.
 	 */
 	if (!(p->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) {
+		gpiod_set_value(port->rs485_re_gpio, 1);
 		serial8250_clear_and_reinit_fifos(p);
 
 		p->ier |= UART_IER_RLSI | UART_IER_RDI;
@@ -1567,9 +1569,12 @@  static inline void __start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
 void serial8250_em485_start_tx(struct uart_8250_port *up)
 {
 	unsigned char mcr = serial8250_in_MCR(up);
+	struct uart_port *port = &up->port;
 
-	if (!(up->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX))
+	if (!(up->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX)) {
+		gpiod_set_value(port->rs485_re_gpio, 0);
 		serial8250_stop_rx(&up->port);
+	}
 
 	if (up->port.rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND)
 		mcr |= UART_MCR_RTS;
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index b56ed8c376b2..8067d20c5275 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -3663,6 +3663,13 @@  int uart_get_rs485_mode(struct uart_port *port)
 	if (port->rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio)
 		port->rs485_supported.flags |= SER_RS485_RX_DURING_TX;
 
+	port->rs485_re_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "rs485-rx-enable", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(port->rs485_re_gpio)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(port->rs485_re_gpio);
+		port->rs485_re_gpio = NULL;
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Cannot get rs485-rx-enable-gpios\n");
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uart_get_rs485_mode);
diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h
index 536b2581d3e2..364583203a24 100644
--- a/include/linux/serial_core.h
+++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h
@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@  struct uart_port {
 	struct serial_rs485	rs485_supported;	/* Supported mask for serial_rs485 */
 	struct gpio_desc	*rs485_term_gpio;	/* enable RS485 bus termination */
 	struct gpio_desc	*rs485_rx_during_tx_gpio; /* Output GPIO that sets the state of RS485 RX during TX */
+	struct gpio_desc	*rs485_re_gpio;		/* gpio RS485 receive enable */
 	struct serial_iso7816   iso7816;
 	void			*private_data;		/* generic platform data pointer */
 };