From patchwork Thu Jan 25 06:21:41 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Deepak Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 191861 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7300:2553:b0:103:945f:af90 with SMTP id p19csp1454361dyi; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:34:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEiK3v7307QCdYfHoVLgGwg840k9Ckn8mYfVdKSivuqvcxqH5Sujv9kZYDRfxJbfoMl5Y/M X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3c8:b0:55c:9168:ea3e with SMTP id t8-20020a05640203c800b0055c9168ea3emr268692edw.36.1706164490742; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:34:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1706164490; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ERDqVRXYt3XkvCOOsGqbHyKu26CDSOycinIfaR49myxEd7c5fKzXAU7KSr73eSTmpw gfCPldiJX4qsSgz+wX0IUwk23X562YxpmeNAtQopDBjAfisDh4x71etchFzDpOMCrDKa wE542KSnHuXnJvB0Ki/fGJ4mv+XsqP3JH/gHucU7d8+6/AWcRZVHfDgq+FRGNqYzbUql zHeHbrfVHQ1/jJ+Yy15qoP068zCcnTmH4azjPgGGeikV8L9e0p+S1e+SfJQ/f1vRs0Sk DysWv6L94HIA0hy3HMS50TvE4Z2+r3tqssTIJ7dnBZt1mNNNffq4xdwDnB9wy9otaiEo NzNg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id :date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=ElZ8v003TL24bpwLuLWIXAZR4LH6JaW8OFYo6Q46gr4=; fh=oy7V1wWqiaug32hsWRXm98kKNp5NFPTWbY7PiGr4deM=; b=QDyeRLAmHgUFJU05QIMmtvZbmS1gwoxtf5zCqzWHe2sS7yt0qQRVOoGv8KQ5DmPiyh QzmQ85foRsUwO26R0jur8JRqiI5LsqZ1Gp9F55DtIo9WCz0wpxPdYijxrTEIvba7AjmX NS/YQYZ7/rfW61KdkuJmThrKMvS+HgVqUONUD1o/TTH44kb5Ts+jECoj4fQAchZvsxlv vW1yxNuRZzsvgUeGldouR3VIyFgoUa7qtgLxEhfQuXDMYIx54yaOuvuUDJ7ofebcLxoF im9lpk59eyfarSkZ01M0y/VMzIljTnKRri81HAQDFzIQ40P3yZUzrr3d45Ld8o0ZXiFl WxHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=BVX3GZfP; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=rivosinc.com dkim=pass dkdomain=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-38024-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-38024-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d30-20020a056402401e00b0055cfd9b2b8fsi369894eda.279.2024.01.24.22.34.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:34:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-38024-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=BVX3GZfP; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=rivosinc.com dkim=pass dkdomain=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-38024-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-38024-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34EE11F26788 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E3D1BC22; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="BVX3GZfP" Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com (mail-pg1-f170.google.com [209.85.215.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB47C1B949 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 06:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.170 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706164198; cv=none; b=avrmspSyJTKS1e8tcoxSPgzGtwl/LfFQsHY9TPhhrdFEgnqupWANzL+mhVm42nW2twiwh4adVc9eIIlJnS2/b7iGRXa1Blsid/KRuKsybHYX9gHrn6ILuFjxOEeWf7Jd0m1hgmmeUmZ1TJfKsda4FuggPJRkJGEo6YnFuTXpXoY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706164198; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y0HDtP9fvyG36vNRUci9B2KmbbdaiDxuB3n1xjv5xOQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=i1TA1P3wVPI50o7Sz+Uo12m7DMgXy24PBp58eMb2bGglL2ozKGdnPLshHIeSAlA/m3leU6kNBwn0aOhdIe2bmSFj+vRmKCbcLku07yl71ObhhD7MQ31WUzcQ53Uv4TCa+POE/Gr61MTthj5ihA04FnI4hnYPHwKkWbWYMP3d8xQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=BVX3GZfP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5cf2d73a183so294450a12.1 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:29:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1706164196; x=1706768996; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ElZ8v003TL24bpwLuLWIXAZR4LH6JaW8OFYo6Q46gr4=; b=BVX3GZfPfsOVnTjP4dTVq+lpIkuE9TIbY1jUoZH7Ow2DxHDVROVw5Pu/6cViS3v5bw cE595PZ482zp04guS4FTa07KCFrCXdrh/AJnANzOyS1ACPiVnviWaBUewYIqqEKWXpJW pZtDxuUa75tqpIw/f0gG4/8YlCAS7YpOk7+MNyqvn0Q9cJ/1q/qNvzHVrATcOihCGufL N6h1PnDfhnVPi7t+hyjVB+uwyEdnLxzqRjp77pteZ87jLWYOJuYoGpzqbIMSXH0j7fVe cXmitnZw6iXAtM1yEv5bg9J+VtVxP9k9fFd0tv0TfENTwYFZ9EXwvB68iasppqETZe42 bcHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706164196; x=1706768996; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ElZ8v003TL24bpwLuLWIXAZR4LH6JaW8OFYo6Q46gr4=; b=Rc8Wij6hbn1badFluJLrmIaFKBZYKVIKC2FuITFwD4lxJhMsxqtDXs5ffYlF7D3VdY Hebmklhmb3S/UeqJmZoc0Amz1CW8/JrkRoObJ69LW6PPHEss0bXJ9Ss0llD5PYbd+cMJ 3quBQZbzCHOBV5dhJYTrqNgJUJ1RUpv3LLJCBQw+ZWu52Lc2+M9LS1Ey5mjJTQgUO6pU 1Erqen4C/hwBmNp5QCB8T/6SNeFy/fpni85pUWLccsljbos+JOjlaQzLFUaJa6wOTEIu KEVTuuOP82K2UG5nzBD0vBUpNc5tNCFc90ENxLmqms/dvgkZjlPD0bQYTj5+5y++vpMs xZFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4IU8b7IiY4fgZNGyofTRevT9YNURpjbbeIAe1mY688CYJrDMk La9PyiUOg7kOzX9lk1I05mGJsnRkr7WZkkRWvgRrPoMqyYVGZWgB2nRtotdRBCU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3513:b0:19b:7d67:5b35 with SMTP id zc19-20020a056a21351300b0019b7d675b35mr808275pzb.36.1706164196007; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:29:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t19-20020a056a00139300b006dd870b51b8sm3201139pfg.126.2024.01.24.22.29.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:29:55 -0800 (PST) From: debug@rivosinc.com To: rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, broonie@kernel.org, Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, keescook@chromium.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, atishp@atishpatra.org, alex@ghiti.fr, bjorn@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com Cc: corbet@lwn.net, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, ebiederm@xmission.com, shuah@kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, debug@rivosinc.com, guoren@kernel.org, samitolvanen@google.com, evan@rivosinc.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, apatel@ventanamicro.com, mchitale@ventanamicro.com, waylingii@gmail.com, greentime.hu@sifive.com, heiko@sntech.de, jszhang@kernel.org, shikemeng@huaweicloud.com, david@redhat.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn, willy@infradead.org, vincent.chen@sifive.com, andy.chiu@sifive.com, gerg@kernel.org, jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com, mason.huo@starfivetech.com, ancientmodern4@gmail.com, mathis.salmen@matsal.de, cuiyunhui@bytedance.com, bhe@redhat.com, chenjiahao16@huawei.com, ruscur@russell.cc, bgray@linux.ibm.com, alx@kernel.org, baruch@tkos.co.il, zhangqing@loongson.cn, catalin.marinas@arm.com, revest@chromium.org, josh@joshtriplett.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, shr@devkernel.io, omosnace@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, jhubbard@nvidia.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 16/28] riscv/shstk: If needed allocate a new shadow stack on clone Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:21:41 -0800 Message-ID: <20240125062739.1339782-17-debug@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com> References: <20240125062739.1339782-1-debug@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1789043136926520850 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1789043136926520850 From: Deepak Gupta Userspace specifies VM_CLONE to share address space and spawn new thread. `clone` allow userspace to specify a new stack for new thread. However there is no way to specify new shadow stack base address without changing API. This patch allocates a new shadow stack whenever VM_CLONE is given. In case of VM_FORK, parent is suspended until child finishes and thus can child use parent shadow stack. In case of !VM_CLONE, COW kicks in because entire address space is copied from parent to child. `clone3` is extensible and can provide mechanisms using which shadow stack as an input parameter can be provided. This is not settled yet and being extensively discussed on mailing list. Once that's settled, this commit will adapt to that. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 39 ++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 10 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 170 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h index 080d7077d12c..eb9a0905e72b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +struct task_struct; +struct kernel_clone_args; + #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ @@ -17,6 +20,42 @@ struct cfi_status { unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ }; +unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, + const struct kernel_clone_args *args); +void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk); +void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size); +void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); +bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); + +#else + +static inline unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, + const struct kernel_clone_args *args) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + +} + +static inline void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, + unsigned long size) +{ + +} + +static inline void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) +{ + +} + +static inline bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return false; +} + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index c249cf3d8083..a2b2a686a545 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include register unsigned long gp_in_global __asm__("gp"); @@ -194,6 +195,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src) void exit_thread(struct task_struct *tsk) { + shstk_release(tsk); return; } @@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args) unsigned long clone_flags = args->flags; unsigned long usp = args->stack; unsigned long tls = args->tls; + unsigned long ssp = 0; struct pt_regs *childregs = task_pt_regs(p); memset(&p->thread.s, 0, sizeof(p->thread.s)); @@ -217,11 +220,18 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args) p->thread.s[0] = (unsigned long)args->fn; p->thread.s[1] = (unsigned long)args->fn_arg; } else { + /* allocate new shadow stack if needed. In case of CLONE_VM we have to */ + ssp = shstk_alloc_thread_stack(p, args); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ssp)) + return PTR_ERR((void *)ssp); + *childregs = *(current_pt_regs()); /* Turn off status.VS */ riscv_v_vstate_off(childregs); if (usp) /* User fork */ childregs->sp = usp; + if (ssp) /* if needed, set new ssp */ + set_active_shstk(p, ssp); if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS) childregs->tp = tls; childregs->a0 = 0; /* Return value of fork() */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index 35ede2cbc05b..36cac0d653f5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -19,6 +19,41 @@ #define SHSTK_ENTRY_SIZE sizeof(void *) +bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en ? true : false; +} + +void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, unsigned long size) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base = shstk_addr; + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_size = size; +} + +unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size) +{ + if (size) + *size = task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_size; + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base; +} + +void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk = shstk_addr; +} + +/* + * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as + * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back + */ +static unsigned long calc_shstk_size(unsigned long size) +{ + if (size) + return PAGE_ALIGN(size); + + return PAGE_ALIGN(min_t(unsigned long long, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK), SZ_4G)); +} + /* * Writes on shadow stack can either be `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. `sspush` can happen * implicitly on current shadow stack pointed to by CSR_SSP. `ssamoswap` takes pointer to @@ -148,3 +183,89 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(map_shadow_stack, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, size, unsi return allocate_shadow_stack(addr, aligned_size, size, set_tok); } + +/* + * This gets called during clone/clone3/fork. And is needed to allocate a shadow stack for + * cases where CLONE_VM is specified and thus a different stack is specified by user. We + * thus need a separate shadow stack too. How does separate shadow stack is specified by + * user is still being debated. Once that's settled, remove this part of the comment. + * This function simply returns 0 if shadow stack are not supported or if separate shadow + * stack allocation is not needed (like in case of !CLONE_VM) + */ +unsigned long shstk_alloc_thread_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, + const struct kernel_clone_args *args) +{ + unsigned long addr, size; + + /* If shadow stack is not supported, return 0 */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return 0; + + /* + * If shadow stack is not enabled on the new thread, skip any + * switch to a new shadow stack. + */ + if (is_shstk_enabled(tsk)) + return 0; + + /* + * For CLONE_VFORK the child will share the parents shadow stack. + * Set base = 0 and size = 0, this is special means to track this state + * so the freeing logic run for child knows to leave it alone. + */ + if (args->flags & CLONE_VFORK) { + set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); + return 0; + } + + /* + * For !CLONE_VM the child will use a copy of the parents shadow + * stack. + */ + if (!(args->flags & CLONE_VM)) + return 0; + + /* + * reaching here means, CLONE_VM was specified and thus a separate shadow + * stack is needed for new cloned thread. Note: below allocation is happening + * using current mm. + */ + size = calc_shstk_size(args->stack_size); + addr = allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return addr; + + set_shstk_base(tsk, addr, size); + + return addr + size; +} + +void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) +{ + unsigned long base = 0, size = 0; + /* If shadow stack is not supported or not enabled, nothing to release */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(tsk)) + return; + + /* + * When fork() with CLONE_VM fails, the child (tsk) already has a + * shadow stack allocated, and exit_thread() calls this function to + * free it. In this case the parent (current) and the child share + * the same mm struct. Move forward only when they're same. + */ + if (!tsk->mm || tsk->mm != current->mm) + return; + + /* + * We know shadow stack is enabled but if base is NULL, then + * this task is not managing its own shadow stack (CLONE_VFORK). So + * skip freeing it. + */ + base = get_shstk_base(tsk, &size); + if (!base) + return; + + vm_munmap(base, size); + set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); +}