linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with Linus' tree

Message ID 20240109095405.02bd795f@canb.auug.org.au
State New
Headers
Series linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with Linus' tree |

Commit Message

Stephen Rothwell Jan. 8, 2024, 10:54 p.m. UTC
  Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/extent_io.c

between commit:

  600f111ef51d ("fs: Rename mapping private members")

from Linus' tree and commits:

  08236d11031b ("btrfs: cache folio size and shift in extent_buffer")
  13df3775efca ("btrfs: cleanup metadata page pointer usage")
  082d5bb9b336 ("btrfs: migrate extent_buffer::pages[] to folio")
  09e6cef19c9f ("btrfs: refactor alloc_extent_buffer() to allocate-then-attach method")
  cfbf07e2787e ("btrfs: migrate to use folio private instead of page private")

from the btrfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
  

Patch

diff --cc fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index b6ff6f320198,c8aabe3be169..000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c