drm/vmwgfx: fix kernel-doc Excess struct member 'base'

Message ID 20231215235638.19189-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
State New
Headers
Series drm/vmwgfx: fix kernel-doc Excess struct member 'base' |

Commit Message

Randy Dunlap Dec. 15, 2023, 11:56 p.m. UTC
  Fix a new kernel-doc warning reported by kernel test robot:

vmwgfx_surface.c:55: warning: Excess struct member 'base' description in 'vmw_user_surface'

The other warning is not correct: it is confused by "__counted_by".
Kees has made a separate patch for that.

In -Wall mode, kernel-doc still reports 20 warnings of this nature:
vmwgfx_surface.c:198: warning: No description found for return value of 'vmw_surface_dma_size'
but I am not addressing those.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312150701.kNI9LuM3-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
Cc: VMware Graphics Reviewers <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Zack Rusin Jan. 4, 2024, 3:31 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:56 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> Fix a new kernel-doc warning reported by kernel test robot:
>
> vmwgfx_surface.c:55: warning: Excess struct member 'base' description in 'vmw_user_surface'
>
> The other warning is not correct: it is confused by "__counted_by".
> Kees has made a separate patch for that.
>
> In -Wall mode, kernel-doc still reports 20 warnings of this nature:
> vmwgfx_surface.c:198: warning: No description found for return value of 'vmw_surface_dma_size'
> but I am not addressing those.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312150701.kNI9LuM3-lkp@intel.com/
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Zack Rusin <zackr@vmware.com>
> Cc: VMware Graphics Reviewers <linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c |    1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
>   * struct vmw_user_surface - User-space visible surface resource
>   *
>   * @prime:          The TTM prime object.
> - * @base:           The TTM base object handling user-space visibility.
>   * @srf:            The surface metadata.
>   * @master:         Master of the creating client. Used for security check.
>   */

Thanks, looks great. I went ahead and pushed this one to drm-misc-next.

z
  

Patch

diff -- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_surface.c
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ 
  * struct vmw_user_surface - User-space visible surface resource
  *
  * @prime:          The TTM prime object.
- * @base:           The TTM base object handling user-space visibility.
  * @srf:            The surface metadata.
  * @master:         Master of the creating client. Used for security check.
  */