[net,v3,3/5] octeontx2-af: Fix mcs stats register address
Commit Message
This patch adds the miss mcs stats register
for mcs supported platforms.
Fixes: 9312150af8da ("octeontx2-af: cn10k: mcs: Support for stats collection")
Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c | 4 +--
.../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:28:16PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> This patch adds the miss mcs stats register
> for mcs supported platforms.
>
> Fixes: 9312150af8da ("octeontx2-af: cn10k: mcs: Support for stats collection")
> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c | 4 +--
> .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> index d6effbe46208..d4a4e4c837ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void mcs_get_rx_secy_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct mcs_secy_stats *stats, int id
> reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYTAGGEDCTLX(id);
> stats->pkt_tagged_ctl_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
>
> - reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(id);
> + reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(id);
> stats->pkt_untaged_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
>
> reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(id);
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void mcs_get_sc_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct mcs_sc_stats *stats,
> reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCNOTVALIDX(id);
> stats->pkt_notvalid_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
>
> - reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(id);
> + reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(id);
> stats->pkt_unchecked_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
>
> if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> index f3ab01fc363c..f4c6de89002c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> @@ -810,14 +810,37 @@
> offset = 0x9d8ull; \
> offset; })
>
> +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(a) ({ \
> + u64 offset; \
> + \
> + offset = 0xee80ull; \
> + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> + offset = 0xe818ull; \
> + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> + offset; })
Hi Geetha,
I see this is consistent with existing code in this file,
but I do wonder if there would be value in moving to a more
compact mechanism at some point. F.e. (completely untested!):
#define MCSX_REG(base, a) ((base) + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_MB_REG(base_mb, base, a) \
MCSX_REG((mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1 ? (base_mb) : (base)), (a))
...
#define MCSX_MCS_TOP_SLAVE_PORT_RESET(a) MCSX_MB_REG(0xa28ull, 0x408ull, (a))
...
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a) MCSX_REG(0xb680ull, (a))
...
In any case, such a change isn't for this patch, which looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> +
> +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a) ({ \
> + u64 offset; \
> + \
> + offset = 0xa680ull; \
> + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> + offset = 0xd018ull; \
> + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> + offset; })
> +
> +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a) ({ \
> + u64 offset; \
> + \
> + offset = 0xf680ull; \
> + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> + offset = 0xe018ull; \
> + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> + offset; })
> +
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCDECRYPTEDX(a) (0xe680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCVALIDATEX(a) (0xde80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(a) (0xa680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYNOTAGX(a) (0xd218 + (a) * 0x8ull)
> -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a) (0xd018ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(a) (0xee80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a) (0xb680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a) (0xf680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSAINVALIDX(a) (0x12680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTUSINGSAERRORX(a) (0x15680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTVALIDX(a) (0x13680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 3, 2023 10:31 PM
> To: Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@marvell.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kuba@kernel.org;
> davem@davemloft.net; pabeni@redhat.com; edumazet@google.com; Sunil
> Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>; Linu Cherian
> <lcherian@marvell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@marvell.com>; Hariprasad Kelam
> <hkelam@marvell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [net v3 PATCH 3/5] octeontx2-af: Fix mcs stats register
> address
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:28:16PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> > This patch adds the miss mcs stats register for mcs supported
> > platforms.
> >
> > Fixes: 9312150af8da ("octeontx2-af: cn10k: mcs: Support for stats
> > collection")
> > Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c | 4 +--
> > .../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > index d6effbe46208..d4a4e4c837ec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
> > @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void mcs_get_rx_secy_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct
> mcs_secy_stats *stats, int id
> > reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYTAGGEDCTLX(id);
> > stats->pkt_tagged_ctl_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > - reg =
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(id);
> > + reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(id);
> > stats->pkt_untaged_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(id);
> > @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void mcs_get_sc_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct
> mcs_sc_stats *stats,
> > reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCNOTVALIDX(id);
> > stats->pkt_notvalid_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > - reg =
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(id);
> > + reg =
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(id);
> > stats->pkt_unchecked_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
> >
> > if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > index f3ab01fc363c..f4c6de89002c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs_reg.h
> > @@ -810,14 +810,37 @@
> > offset = 0x9d8ull; \
> > offset; })
> >
> > +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(a) ({ \
> > + u64 offset; \
> > + \
> > + offset = 0xee80ull; \
> > + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> > + offset = 0xe818ull; \
> > + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> > + offset; })
>
> Hi Geetha,
>
> I see this is consistent with existing code in this file, but I do wonder if there
> would be value in moving to a more compact mechanism at some point. F.e.
> (completely untested!):
>
> #define MCSX_REG(base, a) ((base) + (a) * 0x8ull) #define
> MCSX_MB_REG(base_mb, base, a) \
> MCSX_REG((mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1 ? (base_mb) : (base)), (a)) ...
> #define MCSX_MCS_TOP_SLAVE_PORT_RESET(a) MCSX_MB_REG(0xa28ull,
> 0x408ull, (a)) ...
> #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a)
> MCSX_REG(0xb680ull, (a)) ...
>
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your suggestion. Will take this in different patch set.
> In any case, such a change isn't for this patch, which looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
>
> > +
> > +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a) ({ \
> > + u64 offset; \
> > + \
> > + offset = 0xa680ull; \
> > + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> > + offset = 0xd018ull; \
> > + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> > + offset; })
> > +
> > +#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a) ({
> \
> > + u64 offset; \
> > + \
> > + offset = 0xf680ull; \
> > + if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
> > + offset = 0xe018ull; \
> > + offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
> > + offset; })
> > +
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCDECRYPTEDX(a)
> (0xe680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCVALIDATEX(a)
> (0xde80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > -#define
> MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(a)
> (0xa680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYNOTAGX(a) (0xd218 + (a)
> * 0x8ull)
> > -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a)
> (0xd018ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(a)
> (0xee80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a)
> (0xb680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > -#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a)
> (0xf680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSAINVALIDX(a) (0x12680ull +
> (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTUSINGSAERRORX(a)
> (0x15680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > #define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTVALIDX(a)
> (0x13680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ void mcs_get_rx_secy_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct mcs_secy_stats *stats, int id
reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYTAGGEDCTLX(id);
stats->pkt_tagged_ctl_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
- reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(id);
+ reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(id);
stats->pkt_untaged_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(id);
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ void mcs_get_sc_stats(struct mcs *mcs, struct mcs_sc_stats *stats,
reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCNOTVALIDX(id);
stats->pkt_notvalid_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
- reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(id);
+ reg = MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(id);
stats->pkt_unchecked_cnt = mcs_reg_read(mcs, reg);
if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) {
@@ -810,14 +810,37 @@
offset = 0x9d8ull; \
offset; })
+#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDX(a) ({ \
+ u64 offset; \
+ \
+ offset = 0xee80ull; \
+ if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
+ offset = 0xe818ull; \
+ offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
+ offset; })
+
+#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a) ({ \
+ u64 offset; \
+ \
+ offset = 0xa680ull; \
+ if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
+ offset = 0xd018ull; \
+ offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
+ offset; })
+
+#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a) ({ \
+ u64 offset; \
+ \
+ offset = 0xf680ull; \
+ if (mcs->hw->mcs_blks > 1) \
+ offset = 0xe018ull; \
+ offset += (a) * 0x8ull; \
+ offset; })
+
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCDECRYPTEDX(a) (0xe680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INOCTETSSCVALIDATEX(a) (0xde80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
-#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDORNOTAGX(a) (0xa680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYNOTAGX(a) (0xd218 + (a) * 0x8ull)
-#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYUNTAGGEDX(a) (0xd018ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
-#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCUNCHECKEDOROKX(a) (0xee80ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSECYCTLX(a) (0xb680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
-#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSCLATEORDELAYEDX(a) (0xf680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSAINVALIDX(a) (0x12680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTUSINGSAERRORX(a) (0x15680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)
#define MCSX_CSE_RX_MEM_SLAVE_INPKTSSANOTVALIDX(a) (0x13680ull + (a) * 0x8ull)