ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: trivial: align code
Commit Message
No functionality change, squash some lines and align parameters for
function prototypes to 80 chars.
Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@collabora.com>
---
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Comments
Il 17/11/23 17:09, Eugen Hristev ha scritto:
> No functionality change, squash some lines and align parameters for
> function prototypes to 80 chars.
>
Please use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the correct recipients list.
> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@collabora.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
> index 55edf6374578..dda648c1e8f8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-afe-control.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static unsigned int pcm_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate)
> return MTK_AFE_PCM_RATE_48K;
> }
>
> -unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate)
> +unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev,
> + unsigned int rate)
That's not needed, 86 columns is ok.
> {
> switch (rate) {
> case 8000:
> @@ -222,7 +223,8 @@ unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int
> return MTK_AFE_TDM_RELATCH_RATE_48K;
> }
>
> -unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate, int aud_blk)
> +unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate,
> + int aud_blk)
Same here, not needed.
> {
> switch (aud_blk) {
> case MT8186_DAI_PCM:
> @@ -234,14 +236,13 @@ unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate, int au
> }
> }
>
> -int mt8186_dai_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id, int priv_size, const void *priv_data)
> +int mt8186_dai_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id, int priv_size,
> + const void *priv_data)
ditto.
> {
> struct mt8186_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
> void *temp_data;
>
> - temp_data = devm_kzalloc(afe->dev,
> - priv_size,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + temp_data = devm_kzalloc(afe->dev, priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
The only change I agree on is this one... but I don't know if it's even worth
making a commit for just this...
Regards,
Angelo
@@ -181,7 +181,8 @@ static unsigned int pcm_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate)
return MTK_AFE_PCM_RATE_48K;
}
-unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate)
+unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev,
+ unsigned int rate)
{
switch (rate) {
case 8000:
@@ -222,7 +223,8 @@ unsigned int mt8186_tdm_relatch_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int
return MTK_AFE_TDM_RELATCH_RATE_48K;
}
-unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate, int aud_blk)
+unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate,
+ int aud_blk)
{
switch (aud_blk) {
case MT8186_DAI_PCM:
@@ -234,14 +236,13 @@ unsigned int mt8186_rate_transform(struct device *dev, unsigned int rate, int au
}
}
-int mt8186_dai_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id, int priv_size, const void *priv_data)
+int mt8186_dai_set_priv(struct mtk_base_afe *afe, int id, int priv_size,
+ const void *priv_data)
{
struct mt8186_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
void *temp_data;
- temp_data = devm_kzalloc(afe->dev,
- priv_size,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ temp_data = devm_kzalloc(afe->dev, priv_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!temp_data)
return -ENOMEM;