mwifiex: clean up some inconsistent indenting
Commit Message
No functional modification involved.
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c:789 mwifiex_process_sta_event() warn: inconsistent indenting.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=7226
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Comments
On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 16:33 +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> No functional modification involved.
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c:789 mwifiex_process_sta_event() warn: inconsistent indenting.
OK, sure ...
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT, "info: EVENT: AWAKE\n");
> if (!adapter->pps_uapsd_mode &&
> (priv->port_open ||
> - (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
> + (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
> priv->media_connected && adapter->sleep_period.period) {
> adapter->pps_uapsd_mode = true;
> mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT,
> @@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> if (mwifiex_check_last_packet_indication(priv)) {
> if (adapter->data_sent ||
> (adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready &&
> - !adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready(priv))) {
> + !adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready(priv))) {
> adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE;
> adapter->pm_wakeup_card_req = false;
> adapter->pm_wakeup_fw_try = false;
Seems fine.
> @@ -781,12 +781,10 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> break;
> }
> if (!mwifiex_send_null_packet
> - (priv,
> - MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_NULL_PACKET |
> - MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_LAST_PACKET))
> - adapter->ps_state =
> - PS_STATE_SLEEP;
> - return 0;
> + (priv, MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_NULL_PACKET |
> + MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_LAST_PACKET))
> + adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_SLEEP;
> + return 0;
>
🤷♀️️
That's not really an improvement is it? You've just indented the
function arguments as if they were part another part of the condition? I
mean, sure, it was awful - but ... maybe better break the 80 cols rule
(which isn't one any more anyway)?
johannes
On 11/10/2023 12:33 AM, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> No functional modification involved.
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c:789 mwifiex_process_sta_event() warn: inconsistent indenting.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=7226
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> index df9cdd10a494..9dd3b6d71026 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c
> @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT, "info: EVENT: AWAKE\n");
> if (!adapter->pps_uapsd_mode &&
> (priv->port_open ||
> - (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
> + (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
this change looks incorrect to me
this condition is *inside* the parenthesis from the beginning of the
previous line, and hence this should align after that parenthesis, not
with that parenthesis, which is what the existing code is doing
> priv->media_connected && adapter->sleep_period.period) {
> adapter->pps_uapsd_mode = true;
> mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT,
> @@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
> if (mwifiex_check_last_packet_indication(priv)) {
> if (adapter->data_sent ||
> (adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready &&
> - !adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready(priv))) {
> + !adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready(priv))) {
same thing here
> adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE;
> adapter->pm_wakeup_card_req = false;
> adapter->pm_wakeup_fw_try = false;
On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 16:38 -0800, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_event.c:789 mwifiex_process_sta_event() warn: inconsistent indenting.
> >
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > if (!adapter->pps_uapsd_mode &&
> > (priv->port_open ||
> > - (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
> > + (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
>
> this change looks incorrect to me
> this condition is *inside* the parenthesis from the beginning of the
> previous line, and hence this should align after that parenthesis, not
> with that parenthesis, which is what the existing code is doing
Hah, you're right, I completely missed that! I guess someone should fix
their tools :)
johannes
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT, "info: EVENT: AWAKE\n");
if (!adapter->pps_uapsd_mode &&
(priv->port_open ||
- (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
+ (priv->bss_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC)) &&
priv->media_connected && adapter->sleep_period.period) {
adapter->pps_uapsd_mode = true;
mwifiex_dbg(adapter, EVENT,
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
if (mwifiex_check_last_packet_indication(priv)) {
if (adapter->data_sent ||
(adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready &&
- !adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready(priv))) {
+ !adapter->if_ops.is_port_ready(priv))) {
adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE;
adapter->pm_wakeup_card_req = false;
adapter->pm_wakeup_fw_try = false;
@@ -781,12 +781,10 @@ int mwifiex_process_sta_event(struct mwifiex_private *priv)
break;
}
if (!mwifiex_send_null_packet
- (priv,
- MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_NULL_PACKET |
- MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_LAST_PACKET))
- adapter->ps_state =
- PS_STATE_SLEEP;
- return 0;
+ (priv, MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_NULL_PACKET |
+ MWIFIEX_TxPD_POWER_MGMT_LAST_PACKET))
+ adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_SLEEP;
+ return 0;
}
}
adapter->ps_state = PS_STATE_AWAKE;