diff mbox series

selftests: bpf: xskxceiver: ksft_print_msg: fix format type error

Message ID 20231103112237.1756288-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org
State New
Headers
Series selftests: bpf: xskxceiver: ksft_print_msg: fix format type error |

Commit Message

Anders Roxell Nov. 3, 2023, 11:22 a.m. UTC 
  Crossbuilding selftests/bpf for architecture arm64, format specifies
type error show up like.

xskxceiver.c:912:34: error: format specifies type 'int' but the argument
has type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
 ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
                                                                ~~
                                                                %llu
                __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~
xskxceiver.c:929:55: error: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but
 the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
 ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
                                    ~~~~             ^~~~

Fixing the issues by using the proposed format specifiers by the
compilor.

Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Nov. 3, 2023, 4:26 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:23 AM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Crossbuilding selftests/bpf for architecture arm64, format specifies
> type error show up like.
>
> xskxceiver.c:912:34: error: format specifies type 'int' but the argument
> has type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
>  ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
>                                                                 ~~
>                                                                 %llu
>                 __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
>                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~
> xskxceiver.c:929:55: error: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but
>  the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
>  ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
>                                     ~~~~             ^~~~
>

With u64s it might be %llx or %lx, depending on architecture, so best
is to force cast to (long long) or (unsigned long long) and then use
%llx.

> Fixing the issues by using the proposed format specifiers by the
> compilor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> index 591ca9637b23..dc03692f34d8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static bool is_metadata_correct(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr)
>         struct xdp_info *meta = data - sizeof(struct xdp_info);
>
>         if (meta->count != pkt->pkt_nb) {
> -               ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
> +               ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%llu]\n",
>                                __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
>                 return false;
>         }
> @@ -926,11 +926,11 @@ static bool is_frag_valid(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr, u32 len, u32 exp
>
>         if (addr >= umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size ||
>             addr + len > umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size) {
> -               ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> +               ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len);
>                 return false;
>         }
>         if (!umem->unaligned_mode && addr % umem->frame_size + len > umem->frame_size) {
> -               ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> +               ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len);
>                 return false;
>         }
>
> @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
>                         u64 addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(&xsk->umem->cq, idx + rcvd - 1);
>
>                         ksft_print_msg("[%s] Too many packets completed\n", __func__);
> -                       ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n", addr);
> +                       ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %lx\n", addr);
>                         return TEST_FAILURE;
>                 }
>
> @@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@ static int validate_tx_invalid_descs(struct ifobject *ifobject)
>         }
>
>         if (stats.tx_invalid_descs != ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) {
> -               ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%u] expected [%u]\n",
> +               ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%llu] expected [%u]\n",
>                                __func__, stats.tx_invalid_descs,
>                                ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts);
>                 return TEST_FAILURE;
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>
Anders Roxell Nov. 8, 2023, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 17:26, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:23 AM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Crossbuilding selftests/bpf for architecture arm64, format specifies
> > type error show up like.
> >
> > xskxceiver.c:912:34: error: format specifies type 'int' but the argument
> > has type '__u64' (aka 'unsigned long long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
> >  ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
> >                                                                 ~~
> >                                                                 %llu
> >                 __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
> >                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > xskxceiver.c:929:55: error: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but
> >  the argument has type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wformat]
> >  ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> >                                     ~~~~             ^~~~
> >
>
> With u64s it might be %llx or %lx, depending on architecture, so best
> is to force cast to (long long) or (unsigned long long) and then use
> %llx.

Thank you Andrii,
v2 posted https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231108110048.1988128-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org/T/#u

Cheers,
Anders

>
> > Fixing the issues by using the proposed format specifiers by the
> > compilor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > index 591ca9637b23..dc03692f34d8 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> > @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static bool is_metadata_correct(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr)
> >         struct xdp_info *meta = data - sizeof(struct xdp_info);
> >
> >         if (meta->count != pkt->pkt_nb) {
> > -               ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
> > +               ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%llu]\n",
> >                                __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> > @@ -926,11 +926,11 @@ static bool is_frag_valid(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr, u32 len, u32 exp
> >
> >         if (addr >= umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size ||
> >             addr + len > umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size) {
> > -               ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> > +               ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> >         if (!umem->unaligned_mode && addr % umem->frame_size + len > umem->frame_size) {
> > -               ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> > +               ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len);
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> >
> > @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
> >                         u64 addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(&xsk->umem->cq, idx + rcvd - 1);
> >
> >                         ksft_print_msg("[%s] Too many packets completed\n", __func__);
> > -                       ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n", addr);
> > +                       ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %lx\n", addr);
> >                         return TEST_FAILURE;
> >                 }
> >
> > @@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@ static int validate_tx_invalid_descs(struct ifobject *ifobject)
> >         }
> >
> >         if (stats.tx_invalid_descs != ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) {
> > -               ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%u] expected [%u]\n",
> > +               ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%llu] expected [%u]\n",
> >                                __func__, stats.tx_invalid_descs,
> >                                ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts);
> >                 return TEST_FAILURE;
> > --
> > 2.42.0
> >
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index 591ca9637b23..dc03692f34d8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@  static bool is_metadata_correct(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr)
 	struct xdp_info *meta = data - sizeof(struct xdp_info);
 
 	if (meta->count != pkt->pkt_nb) {
-		ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%d]\n",
+		ksft_print_msg("[%s] expected meta_count [%d], got meta_count [%llu]\n",
 			       __func__, pkt->pkt_nb, meta->count);
 		return false;
 	}
@@ -926,11 +926,11 @@  static bool is_frag_valid(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr, u32 len, u32 exp
 
 	if (addr >= umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size ||
 	    addr + len > umem->num_frames * umem->frame_size) {
-		ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
+		ksft_print_msg("Frag invalid addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len);
 		return false;
 	}
 	if (!umem->unaligned_mode && addr % umem->frame_size + len > umem->frame_size) {
-		ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %llx len: %u\n", addr, len);
+		ksft_print_msg("Frag crosses frame boundary addr: %lx len: %u\n", addr, len);
 		return false;
 	}
 
@@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@  static int complete_pkts(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, int batch_size)
 			u64 addr = *xsk_ring_cons__comp_addr(&xsk->umem->cq, idx + rcvd - 1);
 
 			ksft_print_msg("[%s] Too many packets completed\n", __func__);
-			ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %llx\n", addr);
+			ksft_print_msg("Last completion address: %lx\n", addr);
 			return TEST_FAILURE;
 		}
 
@@ -1513,7 +1513,7 @@  static int validate_tx_invalid_descs(struct ifobject *ifobject)
 	}
 
 	if (stats.tx_invalid_descs != ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) {
-		ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%u] expected [%u]\n",
+		ksft_print_msg("[%s] tx_invalid_descs incorrect. Got [%llu] expected [%u]\n",
 			       __func__, stats.tx_invalid_descs,
 			       ifobject->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts);
 		return TEST_FAILURE;