[V5,4/8] perf/x86/intel: Reorganize attrs and is_visible
Commit Message
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Some attrs and is_visible implementations are rather far away from one
another which makes the whole thing hard to interpret.
There are only two attribute groups which have both .attrs and
.is_visible, group_default and group_caps_lbr. Move them together.
No functional changes.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
New patch
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
@@ -5540,6 +5540,12 @@ static struct attribute *lbr_attrs[] = {
NULL
};
+static umode_t
+lbr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
+{
+ return x86_pmu.lbr_nr ? attr->mode : 0;
+}
+
static char pmu_name_str[30];
static ssize_t pmu_name_show(struct device *cdev,
@@ -5566,6 +5572,15 @@ static struct attribute *intel_pmu_attrs[] = {
NULL,
};
+static umode_t
+default_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
+{
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_allow_tsx_force_abort.attr)
+ return x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_TFA ? attr->mode : 0;
+
+ return attr->mode;
+}
+
static umode_t
tsx_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
{
@@ -5587,27 +5602,12 @@ mem_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
return pebs_is_visible(kobj, attr, i);
}
-static umode_t
-lbr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
-{
- return x86_pmu.lbr_nr ? attr->mode : 0;
-}
-
static umode_t
exra_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
{
return x86_pmu.version >= 2 ? attr->mode : 0;
}
-static umode_t
-default_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
-{
- if (attr == &dev_attr_allow_tsx_force_abort.attr)
- return x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_TFA ? attr->mode : 0;
-
- return attr->mode;
-}
-
static struct attribute_group group_events_td = {
.name = "events",
};