[v3,3/5] mm/khugepaged: Convert is_refcount_suitable() to use folios

Message ID 20231020183331.10770-4-vishal.moola@gmail.com
State New
Headers
Series Some khugepaged folio conversions |

Commit Message

Vishal Moola Oct. 20, 2023, 6:33 p.m. UTC
  Both callers of is_refcount_suitable() have been converted to use
folios, so convert it to take in a folio. Both callers only operate on
head pages of folios so mapcount/refcount conversions here are trivial.

Removes 3 calls to compound head, and removes 315 bytes of kernel text.

Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
---
 mm/khugepaged.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
  

Comments

David Hildenbrand Oct. 23, 2023, 7:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On 20.10.23 20:33, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
> Both callers of is_refcount_suitable() have been converted to use
> folios, so convert it to take in a folio. Both callers only operate on
> head pages of folios so mapcount/refcount conversions here are trivial.
> 
> Removes 3 calls to compound head, and removes 315 bytes of kernel text.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>
> ---
>   mm/khugepaged.c | 14 +++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 6c4b5af43371..9efd8ff68f06 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -524,15 +524,15 @@ static void release_pte_pages(pte_t *pte, pte_t *_pte,
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -static bool is_refcount_suitable(struct page *page)
> +static bool is_refcount_suitable(struct folio *folio)
>   {
>   	int expected_refcount;
>   
> -	expected_refcount = total_mapcount(page);
> -	if (PageSwapCache(page))
> -		expected_refcount += compound_nr(page);
> +	expected_refcount = folio_mapcount(folio);
> +	if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
> +		expected_refcount += folio_nr_pages(folio);
>   
> -	return page_count(page) == expected_refcount;
> +	return folio_ref_count(folio) == expected_refcount;
>   }
>   
>   static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>   		 * but not from this process. The other process cannot write to
>   		 * the page, only trigger CoW.
>   		 */
> -		if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
> +		if (!is_refcount_suitable(folio)) {
>   			folio_unlock(folio);
>   			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
>   			goto out;
> @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   		 * has excessive GUP pins (i.e. 512).  Anyway the same check
>   		 * will be done again later the risk seems low.
>   		 */
> -		if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
> +		if (!is_refcount_suitable(folio)) {
>   			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
>   			goto out_unmap;
>   		}

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
  
Yang Shi Oct. 24, 2023, 5:39 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 11:34 AM Vishal Moola (Oracle)
<vishal.moola@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Both callers of is_refcount_suitable() have been converted to use
> folios, so convert it to take in a folio. Both callers only operate on
> head pages of folios so mapcount/refcount conversions here are trivial.
>
> Removes 3 calls to compound head, and removes 315 bytes of kernel text.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>

> ---
>  mm/khugepaged.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 6c4b5af43371..9efd8ff68f06 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -524,15 +524,15 @@ static void release_pte_pages(pte_t *pte, pte_t *_pte,
>         }
>  }
>
> -static bool is_refcount_suitable(struct page *page)
> +static bool is_refcount_suitable(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>         int expected_refcount;
>
> -       expected_refcount = total_mapcount(page);
> -       if (PageSwapCache(page))
> -               expected_refcount += compound_nr(page);
> +       expected_refcount = folio_mapcount(folio);
> +       if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
> +               expected_refcount += folio_nr_pages(folio);
>
> -       return page_count(page) == expected_refcount;
> +       return folio_ref_count(folio) == expected_refcount;
>  }
>
>  static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>                  * but not from this process. The other process cannot write to
>                  * the page, only trigger CoW.
>                  */
> -               if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
> +               if (!is_refcount_suitable(folio)) {
>                         folio_unlock(folio);
>                         result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
>                         goto out;
> @@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
>                  * has excessive GUP pins (i.e. 512).  Anyway the same check
>                  * will be done again later the risk seems low.
>                  */
> -               if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
> +               if (!is_refcount_suitable(folio)) {
>                         result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
>                         goto out_unmap;
>                 }
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
index 6c4b5af43371..9efd8ff68f06 100644
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c
+++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -524,15 +524,15 @@  static void release_pte_pages(pte_t *pte, pte_t *_pte,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool is_refcount_suitable(struct page *page)
+static bool is_refcount_suitable(struct folio *folio)
 {
 	int expected_refcount;
 
-	expected_refcount = total_mapcount(page);
-	if (PageSwapCache(page))
-		expected_refcount += compound_nr(page);
+	expected_refcount = folio_mapcount(folio);
+	if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
+		expected_refcount += folio_nr_pages(folio);
 
-	return page_count(page) == expected_refcount;
+	return folio_ref_count(folio) == expected_refcount;
 }
 
 static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@  static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * but not from this process. The other process cannot write to
 		 * the page, only trigger CoW.
 		 */
-		if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
+		if (!is_refcount_suitable(folio)) {
 			folio_unlock(folio);
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
 			goto out;
@@ -1371,7 +1371,7 @@  static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 * has excessive GUP pins (i.e. 512).  Anyway the same check
 		 * will be done again later the risk seems low.
 		 */
-		if (!is_refcount_suitable(&folio->page)) {
+		if (!is_refcount_suitable(folio)) {
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}