Message ID | 20231020024240.7708-1-yangxingui@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:612c:2010:b0:403:3b70:6f57 with SMTP id fe16csp785819vqb; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:46:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFtEqA8jCb7AUDTiVGpOjLneL5FWTYQpjUHnS6wgseR7Ga7O4g9ipSTO4zJCFJxTV9Vzlcd X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3d85:b0:154:e887:f581 with SMTP id bj5-20020a056a213d8500b00154e887f581mr584351pzc.58.1697770012333; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:46:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1697770012; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mzp7diwQX2RMu7ER+/Rd1CzttlbHfG0O223AVyO17IvuUB0Ic4hkltfRNhPNReV5Bo 1ebKGlrgyy6r5Rebi7+igrYRG9AaGVzTW91zYxu3pITb8evRerrWJEDMYLZmFjCMreQg QLjSTK0k2MXAphPMqWmImoNcV+nwkaQ05Eodvq+qHGnEvigUo8YkKGMsVbfN8gqr5xI4 qyIYil2zOXi1ReKA/yt0U7WUpT0NkJFzPFXa7tZGsnnSKYE7Jqe6btTLQOJHsTogy+qy 50+woRvoXbZSmyGgkkMRU9fRscPbTY3eyuPx7oHBg5oO5W/ak/ybGsdeYyuY0FsD7GDM iMKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Ej8L7qST6FE24JDz8YHbsy9TrGZPmFyBJEegrFjKgIk=; fh=27xc93GhJfM5uXum+lQqhfgkfZxmIlVzL9a31/wQrQw=; b=0uJJjo1WQeVS8Wvw/QgGJBp93VaXniUpxEq1fdn73bKFvp9TIOxsAUqNFX/R937CQg +ea31ykcBTQgylM5K8tvXO1lmz++C7/TvUpjbIK/xzkQUikQvNH6EbHn1exUrz5xhzFr XKCgbWuXuucRheWW9e0DwS/+DfpQWJWJCE3o3i0JaofWtk7boubH+7DKpF0ZXGbnQefu 5qfGdseEEMbk87jXwY+ooe5h+DasOUIBQxrcI+fM1+kvr/86R3Lw7NYOJO5ufXjqxB+I 1plGCK/U19kxGcMYuAp8QxNKEukLlTR3TjIJt33H+VcunTdmhtQ0zAlOX+/S8BmYNNI8 aEtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from snail.vger.email (snail.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hk8-20020a17090b224800b00275cffed966si3583599pjb.57.2023.10.19.19.46.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by snail.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810AD8092DA3; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:46:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at snail.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346873AbjJTCpw (ORCPT <rfc822;lkml4gm@gmail.com> + 25 others); Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:45:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56718 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233397AbjJTCpu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:45:50 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB0F130; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500012.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SBTQl5mLnzrSbN; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:42:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.50.163.32) by dggpemm500012.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.31; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:45:41 +0800 From: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com> To: <john.g.garry@oracle.com>, <yanaijie@huawei.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@oracle.com> CC: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>, <yangxingui@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>, <kangfenglong@huawei.com>, <xiabing12@h-partners.com> Subject: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: fix set zero-address when device-type != NO_DEVICE Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 02:42:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20231020024240.7708-1-yangxingui@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.50.163.32] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm500012.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.89) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (snail.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:46:01 -0700 (PDT) X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1780240888797454729 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1780240888797454729 |
Series |
scsi: libsas: fix set zero-address when device-type != NO_DEVICE
|
|
Commit Message
yangxingui
Oct. 20, 2023, 2:42 a.m. UTC
phy->attached_sas_addr will be set to a zero-address when
phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS but device-type != NO_DEVICE,
and it may trigger BUG() as follows when do revalidate with zero-address:
[562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached
[562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: 0000000000000000 (stp)
[562240.062680] port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's already part of another port
[562240.085064] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[562240.096612] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1083!
[562240.109611] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
[562240.343518] Process kworker/u256:3 (pid: 435909, stack limit = 0x0000000003bcbebf)
[562240.421714] Workqueue: 0000:b4:02.0_disco_q sas_revalidate_domain [libsas]
[562240.437173] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO)
[562240.450478] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas]
[562240.465283] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas]
[562240.479751] sp : ffff0000300cfa70
[562240.674822] Call trace:
[562240.682709] sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas]
[562240.694013] sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0xcc/0x128 [libsas]
[562240.704957] sas_ex_discover_end_dev+0xfc/0x538 [libsas]
[562240.715508] sas_ex_discover_dev+0x3cc/0x4b8 [libsas]
[562240.725634] sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8 [libsas]
[562240.735855] sas_ex_revalidate_domain+0x2f0/0x450 [libsas]
[562240.746123] sas_revalidate_domain+0x158/0x160 [libsas]
[562240.756014] process_one_work+0x1b4/0x448
[562240.764548] worker_thread+0x54/0x468
[562240.772562] kthread+0x134/0x138
[562240.779989] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
So set a zero-address for phy->attached_sas_addr only when
phy->attached_dev_type == NO_DEVICE.
Fixes: 7d1d86518118 ("[SCSI] libsas: fix false positive 'device attached' conditions")
Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On 2023/10/20 10:42, Xingui Yang wrote: > phy->attached_sas_addr will be set to a zero-address when > phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS but device-type != NO_DEVICE, > and it may trigger BUG() as follows when do revalidate with zero-address: Hi Xingui, Why is this zero-addressed PHY added to another port? A zero-addressed PHY should not belong to any port. Thanks, Jason > > [562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached > [562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: 0000000000000000 (stp) > [562240.062680] port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's already part of another port > [562240.085064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [562240.096612] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1083! > [562240.109611] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP > [562240.343518] Process kworker/u256:3 (pid: 435909, stack limit = 0x0000000003bcbebf) > [562240.421714] Workqueue: 0000:b4:02.0_disco_q sas_revalidate_domain [libsas] > [562240.437173] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO) > [562240.450478] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] > [562240.465283] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] > [562240.479751] sp : ffff0000300cfa70 > [562240.674822] Call trace: > [562240.682709] sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] > [562240.694013] sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0xcc/0x128 [libsas] > [562240.704957] sas_ex_discover_end_dev+0xfc/0x538 [libsas] > [562240.715508] sas_ex_discover_dev+0x3cc/0x4b8 [libsas] > [562240.725634] sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8 [libsas] > [562240.735855] sas_ex_revalidate_domain+0x2f0/0x450 [libsas] > [562240.746123] sas_revalidate_domain+0x158/0x160 [libsas] > [562240.756014] process_one_work+0x1b4/0x448 > [562240.764548] worker_thread+0x54/0x468 > [562240.772562] kthread+0x134/0x138 > [562240.779989] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 > > So set a zero-address for phy->attached_sas_addr only when > phy->attached_dev_type == NO_DEVICE. > > Fixes: 7d1d86518118 ("[SCSI] libsas: fix false positive 'device attached' conditions") > > Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c > index a2204674b680..5a81754d3768 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c > @@ -239,8 +239,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, > /* help some expanders that fail to zero sas_address in the 'no > * device' case > */ > - if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED || > - phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS) > + if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED) > memset(phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); > else > memcpy(phy->attached_sas_addr, dr->attached_sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >
On 2023/10/20 11:24, Jason Yan wrote: > On 2023/10/20 10:42, Xingui Yang wrote: >> phy->attached_sas_addr will be set to a zero-address when >> phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS but device-type != NO_DEVICE, >> and it may trigger BUG() as follows when do revalidate with zero-address: > > Hi Xingui, > > Why is this zero-addressed PHY added to another port? A zero-addressed > PHY should not belong to any port. Hi Jason, [562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached [562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: 0000000000000000 (stp) port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's already part of another port we get phy0's data info: crash> struct ex_phy 0xffff8020cead3000 struct ex_phy { phy_id = 0, phy_state = PHY_EMPTY, attached_dev_type = SAS_END_DEVICE, linkrate = SAS_PHY_RESET_IN_PROGRESS, attached_sata_host = 0 '\000', attached_sata_dev = 1 '\001', attached_sata_ps = 0 '\000', attached_tproto = SAS_PROTOCOL_NONE, attached_iproto = SAS_PROTOCOL_NONE, attached_sas_addr = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000", attached_phy_id = 0 '\000', phy_change_count = 152, routing_attr = TABLE_ROUTING, virtual = 0 '\000', last_da_index = -1, phy = 0xffff8020ceac5000, port = 0xffffa0300c6f8800 } When a new device is attached, if the address is 0 and the device type is not null, but stp or ssp, the device still creates a port in sas_ex_discover_end_dev() and add all other expander phys with the same sas_address 0 to this port in sas_ex_get_linkrate(). All of the phys is zero-address belongs to port-7:7:0 as follows: crash> list sas_phy.port_siblings -s sas_phy.dev.kobj.name -s sas_phy.identify.sas_address -h ffff8020ceac5000 ffff8020ceac5000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803017878b00 "phy-7:7:0", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceacb000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803017871980 "phy-7:7:1", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceade000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff80301787f580 "phy-7:7:2", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020cead4000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff80301787d980 "phy-7:7:3", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceacc800 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff80301787a480 "phy-7:7:4", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceac6000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803017872500 "phy-7:7:5", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceacd000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e62100 "phy-7:7:12", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceadb000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e61980 "phy-7:7:13", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceac8800 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e61a00 "phy-7:7:14", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020cead1800 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e69980 "phy-7:7:15", identify.sas_address = 0, Thanks, Xingui > > Thanks, > Jason > >> >> [562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached >> [562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: >> 0000000000000000 (stp) >> [562240.062680] port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's >> already part of another port >> [562240.085064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [562240.096612] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1083! >> [562240.109611] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP >> [562240.343518] Process kworker/u256:3 (pid: 435909, stack limit = >> 0x0000000003bcbebf) >> [562240.421714] Workqueue: 0000:b4:02.0_disco_q sas_revalidate_domain >> [libsas] >> [562240.437173] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO) >> [562240.450478] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] >> [562240.465283] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] >> [562240.479751] sp : ffff0000300cfa70 >> [562240.674822] Call trace: >> [562240.682709] sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] >> [562240.694013] sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0xcc/0x128 [libsas] >> [562240.704957] sas_ex_discover_end_dev+0xfc/0x538 [libsas] >> [562240.715508] sas_ex_discover_dev+0x3cc/0x4b8 [libsas] >> [562240.725634] sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8 [libsas] >> [562240.735855] sas_ex_revalidate_domain+0x2f0/0x450 [libsas] >> [562240.746123] sas_revalidate_domain+0x158/0x160 [libsas] >> [562240.756014] process_one_work+0x1b4/0x448 >> [562240.764548] worker_thread+0x54/0x468 >> [562240.772562] kthread+0x134/0x138 >> [562240.779989] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >> >> So set a zero-address for phy->attached_sas_addr only when >> phy->attached_dev_type == NO_DEVICE. >> >> Fixes: 7d1d86518118 ("[SCSI] libsas: fix false positive 'device >> attached' conditions") >> >> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> index a2204674b680..5a81754d3768 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> @@ -239,8 +239,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device >> *dev, int phy_id, >> /* help some expanders that fail to zero sas_address in the 'no >> * device' case >> */ >> - if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED || >> - phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS) >> + if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED) >> memset(phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> else >> memcpy(phy->attached_sas_addr, dr->attached_sas_addr, >> SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > .
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index a2204674b680..5a81754d3768 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -239,8 +239,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, /* help some expanders that fail to zero sas_address in the 'no * device' case */ - if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED || - phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS) + if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED) memset(phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); else memcpy(phy->attached_sas_addr, dr->attached_sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE);