[v2] drm/nouveau: exec: fix ioctl kernel-doc warning

Message ID 20231008140231.17921-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
State New
Headers
Series [v2] drm/nouveau: exec: fix ioctl kernel-doc warning |

Commit Message

Randy Dunlap Oct. 8, 2023, 2:02 p.m. UTC
  kernel-doc emits a warning:

include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:49: warning: Cannot understand  * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
 on line 49 - I thought it was a doc line

We don't have a way to document a macro value via kernel-doc, so
change the "/**" kernel-doc marker to a C comment and format the comment
more like a kernel-doc comment for consistency.

Fixes: d59e75eef52d ("drm/nouveau: exec: report max pushs through getparam")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
---
v2: update commit text; somehow I sent a version of the patch before
    adding the full text.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231007005518.32015-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/

 include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Lyude Paul Oct. 9, 2023, 9:37 p.m. UTC | #1
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2023-10-08 at 07:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> kernel-doc emits a warning:
> 
> include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:49: warning: Cannot understand  * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
>  on line 49 - I thought it was a doc line
> 
> We don't have a way to document a macro value via kernel-doc, so
> change the "/**" kernel-doc marker to a C comment and format the comment
> more like a kernel-doc comment for consistency.
> 
> Fixes: d59e75eef52d ("drm/nouveau: exec: report max pushs through getparam")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: update commit text; somehow I sent a version of the patch before
>     adding the full text.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231007005518.32015-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
> 
>  include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ extern "C" {
>  #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_BO_USAGE    15
>  #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_PAGEFLIP    16
>  
> -/**
> - * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
> +/*
> + * NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX - query max pushes through getparam
>   *
>   * Query the maximum amount of IBs that can be pushed through a single
>   * &drm_nouveau_exec structure and hence a single &DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC
>
  
Danilo Krummrich Oct. 12, 2023, 5:52 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/8/23 16:02, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> kernel-doc emits a warning:
> 
> include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:49: warning: Cannot understand  * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
>   on line 49 - I thought it was a doc line
> 
> We don't have a way to document a macro value via kernel-doc, so
> change the "/**" kernel-doc marker to a C comment and format the comment
> more like a kernel-doc comment for consistency.
> 
> Fixes: d59e75eef52d ("drm/nouveau: exec: report max pushs through getparam")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>

Thanks for fixing this up, applied to drm-misc-fixes.

- Danilo

> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: update commit text; somehow I sent a version of the patch before
>      adding the full text.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231007005518.32015-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
> 
>   include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h |    4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ extern "C" {
>   #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_BO_USAGE    15
>   #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_PAGEFLIP    16
>   
> -/**
> - * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
> +/*
> + * NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX - query max pushes through getparam
>    *
>    * Query the maximum amount of IBs that can be pushed through a single
>    * &drm_nouveau_exec structure and hence a single &DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC
>
  

Patch

diff -- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
--- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@  extern "C" {
 #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_BO_USAGE    15
 #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_PAGEFLIP    16
 
-/**
- * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
+/*
+ * NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX - query max pushes through getparam
  *
  * Query the maximum amount of IBs that can be pushed through a single
  * &drm_nouveau_exec structure and hence a single &DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC