Message ID | 20230927170015.295232-2-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:cae8:0:b0:403:3b70:6f57 with SMTP id r8csp2896636vqu; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFeUy+R4Dn6OvLXN8tu6ZI3jUIbT5Dw0zSNf8KExOr+5qgeAp3eZLXVLz4RLB3x+k+iP0tN X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa8e:b0:1c5:e5de:dec5 with SMTP id d14-20020a170902aa8e00b001c5e5dedec5mr2318539plr.62.1695848410887; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1695848410; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nTpCE3xAqUHnVfCZURSbu+38LGPzmNiOgu+J8bTWt4Lc0AXmxORvQkR059toJN8LSK Hxz+Dx2Veh2pKS/ZspHTx6OYzRXAz52EajF5KqmliSmgn2woNkLuFpIcCkXY2IBM/MnL XAGGxdJHplzKPJAGA9vtK5x3TPxvWhRAtH4xIjV4NzR7jrw+AFB+kWw8MwAM6Bmux0O9 HTdMxuKpfLTX6+200LWqCb/eOFTGg26OOoi6GbXkrtVlzQBrju/Sq3T+CatvPvbE0/++ NAeT7Y1IgdMf2xDIq4Ww1YOiNl53J2V1IeObaJULfQ8Yd7pKFEkHOCHVZkvb7VNAHFKa Rhwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=+DmNFRxVXj8V3ocvjWMiRzGtl0URBCJyLqRyOWHwpdo=; fh=sfgdT0UZ8CYMELEEedGcAjPKookfa29m+O/tEazxSkQ=; b=QeDuW/DZ5rjyFc2dtSVE1GZCQWskYKFcy4m8/8LvqfTCU6/Tw3MhCXYEAN7dUwVEcU 0mSI04YU2STZJvdN/P1R21Ax29h6EaRvmvhWTFx57uT/kkF2i9cfmaf3J7xU4qXRWuwH 8Fd4VAn+4z47Hjwm/rnjFjb/yUVLUXlJKPy0A1ARB9u4ntDM6qXgG+K96wxn3DZ3iF2F 0aDhVBRk4BiJ7J12t6vL25jLq8/RNxtNb5HrRu75UkvNwIDxtZnRrExnG4jfMwxBqRG3 kot4xCjBm/6hILA2mRb+1BwLqr3th9iRRj6cUy4nulsmkMj/rhzZVsRx7Yf3f4h7EQRZ YCig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.s=google header.b=niJ9TK3u; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from howler.vger.email (howler.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u15-20020a170902e5cf00b001bf0916b665si17631175plf.393.2023.09.27.14.00.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ventanamicro.com header.s=google header.b=niJ9TK3u; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by howler.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D09D8065C9F; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at howler.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229547AbjI0RAe (ORCPT <rfc822;ruipengqi7@gmail.com> + 19 others); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:00:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52372 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229539AbjI0RAc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 13:00:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-x92f.google.com (mail-ua1-x92f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FCB8DE for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ua1-x92f.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-7a803afa8c5so4210515241.0 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:00:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ventanamicro.com; s=google; t=1695834029; x=1696438829; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+DmNFRxVXj8V3ocvjWMiRzGtl0URBCJyLqRyOWHwpdo=; b=niJ9TK3uHDTUJRdvlpKeb3J6E/u8VUuejYA4zVl6fdbZ14/GtVkfjfZrbqXKXPgKWB r0Zfh6MhJBIUv+FTFtqwUPjV2XK6J0vvFz0fPLtAHJTKRxSro5Bua7Yv4mRNq5x3pM84 8TQwCtPbaHHpQhyyCaUyjKWILwzvj2sKcH6dPBYpZhwgJQuvfKwmwXtduUviKNckhqfy jC9ic3wQF15av0ptoptrTRPaldBKvIN6sJp7BzCebmXqAy4wElQcWTNZh1c0ZFtpteoA vpNy1p86b/LOZX9b4ZTGc0ffr78SDR0LFuaW+v5fpl59sT/f4WU7kHHp4oPAiGB9I0xy wamQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695834029; x=1696438829; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+DmNFRxVXj8V3ocvjWMiRzGtl0URBCJyLqRyOWHwpdo=; b=CzENp1vCtrtvXmqzcXVvCIpOc4kZDS/j8BXzFAs0pw5uMAP7nhRtxMK+q4vmvzRhI6 gTa/UyF8pCgCWrBnhPjJV3xdu3b7JqAXqI/uXoix40Qhjmpnf35QQ0mRAoyYbDaJoeap IQYfdjXuiFiPzVicJsKx6Hdx6DPdJlHXsRNMxDbzzuB3pjhC4Trb38JS7WGN8iX+IFMS a3DsNUUfVUCtqK6h8kff2bJNuoiCfm1+6G/UN3vRHuAddANVL6HoagdJFDcyWFntrhkb F44GBuDcGiC74ZsZSjXZD58ij1YcYyNaND2C/75GEJa9zjhl57XK0pSNF1DN5P8A+CEC /3Rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yywn0ty7muO4AEF08npjbyXmQOn6r2u9z9rvcZs5uQ1Y65r3TKR OauU8eTww8Ng9Sk+znlU6ODngQ== X-Received: by 2002:a67:f98f:0:b0:452:81c4:3b56 with SMTP id b15-20020a67f98f000000b0045281c43b56mr2534411vsq.18.1695834028193; Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunil-pc.Dlink ([106.51.190.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u7-20020a637907000000b00584b293d157sm3279396pgc.80.2023.09.27.10.00.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:00:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>, Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 -next 1/4] RISC-V: ACPI: Enhance acpi_os_ioremap with MMIO remapping Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 22:30:12 +0530 Message-Id: <20230927170015.295232-2-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230927170015.295232-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> References: <20230927170015.295232-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (howler.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 27 Sep 2023 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT) X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1778225943241198769 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1778225943241198769 |
Series |
RISC-V: ACPI improvements
|
|
Commit Message
Sunil V L
Sept. 27, 2023, 5 p.m. UTC
Enhance the acpi_os_ioremap() to support opregions in MMIO space. Also, have strict checks using EFI memory map to allow remapping the RAM similar to arm64. Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 10:30:12PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > Enhance the acpi_os_ioremap() to support opregions in MMIO space. Also, > have strict checks using EFI memory map to allow remapping the RAM similar > to arm64. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Thanks for resending this. If you respin, I think it would be worth mentioning here that you are aligning things with arm64. Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Cheer, Conor. > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index d607ab0f7c6d..ac039cf8af7a 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config RISCV > select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL > select ARCH_HAS_VDSO_DATA > + select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT > select ARCH_STACKWALK > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > index 56cb2c986c48..e619edc8b0cc 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/efi.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/memblock.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > -#include <linux/efi.h> > > int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */ > int acpi_disabled = 1; > @@ -217,7 +218,89 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(void __iomem *map, unsigned long size) > > void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) > { > - return (void __iomem *)memremap(phys, size, MEMREMAP_WB); > + efi_memory_desc_t *md, *region = NULL; > + pgprot_t prot; > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))) > + return NULL; > + > + for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) { > + u64 end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT); > + > + if (phys < md->phys_addr || phys >= end) > + continue; > + > + if (phys + size > end) { > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers multiple EFI memory regions\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > + region = md; > + break; > + } > + > + /* > + * It is fine for AML to remap regions that are not represented in the > + * EFI memory map at all, as it only describes normal memory, and MMIO > + * regions that require a virtual mapping to make them accessible to > + * the EFI runtime services. > + */ > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO; > + if (region) { > + switch (region->type) { > + case EFI_LOADER_CODE: > + case EFI_LOADER_DATA: > + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE: > + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA: > + case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY: > + case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY: > + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys) || > + !memblock_is_region_memory(phys, size)) { > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + /* > + * Mapping kernel memory is permitted if the region in > + * question is covered by a single memblock with the > + * NOMAP attribute set: this enables the use of ACPI > + * table overrides passed via initramfs. > + * This particular use case only requires read access. > + */ > + fallthrough; > + > + case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE: > + /* > + * This would be unusual, but not problematic per se, > + * as long as we take care not to create a writable > + * mapping for executable code. > + */ > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO; > + break; > + > + case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY: > + /* > + * ACPI reclaim memory is used to pass firmware tables > + * and other data that is intended for consumption by > + * the OS only, which may decide it wants to reclaim > + * that memory and use it for something else. We never > + * do that, but we usually add it to the linear map > + * anyway, in which case we should use the existing > + * mapping. > + */ > + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys)) > + return (void __iomem *)__va(phys); > + fallthrough; > + > + default: > + if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB) > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL; > + else if ((region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WC) || > + (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WT)) > + prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL); > + } > + } > + > + return ioremap_prot(phys, size, pgprot_val(prot)); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI > -- > 2.39.2 >
Hi Sunil, On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:00 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > Enhance the acpi_os_ioremap() to support opregions in MMIO space. Also, > have strict checks using EFI memory map to allow remapping the RAM similar > to arm64. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index d607ab0f7c6d..ac039cf8af7a 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config RISCV > select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL > select ARCH_HAS_VDSO_DATA > + select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK Shouldn't we restrict this to ACPI? > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT > select ARCH_STACKWALK > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > index 56cb2c986c48..e619edc8b0cc 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/efi.h> > #include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/memblock.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > -#include <linux/efi.h> > > int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */ > int acpi_disabled = 1; > @@ -217,7 +218,89 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(void __iomem *map, unsigned long size) > > void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) > { > - return (void __iomem *)memremap(phys, size, MEMREMAP_WB); > + efi_memory_desc_t *md, *region = NULL; > + pgprot_t prot; > + > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))) > + return NULL; > + > + for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) { > + u64 end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT); > + > + if (phys < md->phys_addr || phys >= end) > + continue; > + > + if (phys + size > end) { > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers multiple EFI memory regions\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > + region = md; > + break; > + } > + > + /* > + * It is fine for AML to remap regions that are not represented in the > + * EFI memory map at all, as it only describes normal memory, and MMIO > + * regions that require a virtual mapping to make them accessible to > + * the EFI runtime services. > + */ > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO; > + if (region) { > + switch (region->type) { > + case EFI_LOADER_CODE: > + case EFI_LOADER_DATA: > + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE: > + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA: > + case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY: > + case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY: > + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys) || > + !memblock_is_region_memory(phys, size)) { > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory\n"); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + /* > + * Mapping kernel memory is permitted if the region in > + * question is covered by a single memblock with the > + * NOMAP attribute set: this enables the use of ACPI > + * table overrides passed via initramfs. > + * This particular use case only requires read access. > + */ > + fallthrough; > + > + case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE: > + /* > + * This would be unusual, but not problematic per se, > + * as long as we take care not to create a writable > + * mapping for executable code. > + */ > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO; > + break; > + > + case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY: > + /* > + * ACPI reclaim memory is used to pass firmware tables > + * and other data that is intended for consumption by > + * the OS only, which may decide it wants to reclaim > + * that memory and use it for something else. We never > + * do that, but we usually add it to the linear map > + * anyway, in which case we should use the existing > + * mapping. > + */ > + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys)) > + return (void __iomem *)__va(phys); > + fallthrough; > + > + default: > + if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB) > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL; > + else if ((region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WC) || > + (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WT)) > + prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL); I have to ask: why is write-through mapped to write-combined here? > + } > + } > + > + return ioremap_prot(phys, size, pgprot_val(prot)); > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI > -- > 2.39.2 > Like Andrew said in v1, too bad we can't merge that with arm64 instead of duplicating. But otherwise, you can add: Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> Thanks, Alex
Hi Alex, On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 08:53:12PM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > Hi Sunil, > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 7:00 PM Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > > > Enhance the acpi_os_ioremap() to support opregions in MMIO space. Also, > > have strict checks using EFI memory map to allow remapping the RAM similar > > to arm64. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > > arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > index d607ab0f7c6d..ac039cf8af7a 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config RISCV > > select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST > > select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL > > select ARCH_HAS_VDSO_DATA > > + select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK > > Shouldn't we restrict this to ACPI? > Sure, Let me update. > > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT > > select ARCH_STACKWALK > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > > index 56cb2c986c48..e619edc8b0cc 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c > > @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ > > */ > > > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > > +#include <linux/efi.h> > > #include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/memblock.h> > > #include <linux/pci.h> > > -#include <linux/efi.h> > > > > int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */ > > int acpi_disabled = 1; > > @@ -217,7 +218,89 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(void __iomem *map, unsigned long size) > > > > void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) > > { > > - return (void __iomem *)memremap(phys, size, MEMREMAP_WB); > > + efi_memory_desc_t *md, *region = NULL; > > + pgprot_t prot; > > + > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) { > > + u64 end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT); > > + > > + if (phys < md->phys_addr || phys >= end) > > + continue; > > + > > + if (phys + size > end) { > > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers multiple EFI memory regions\n"); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + region = md; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * It is fine for AML to remap regions that are not represented in the > > + * EFI memory map at all, as it only describes normal memory, and MMIO > > + * regions that require a virtual mapping to make them accessible to > > + * the EFI runtime services. > > + */ > > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO; > > + if (region) { > > + switch (region->type) { > > + case EFI_LOADER_CODE: > > + case EFI_LOADER_DATA: > > + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE: > > + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA: > > + case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY: > > + case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY: > > + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys) || > > + !memblock_is_region_memory(phys, size)) { > > + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory\n"); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * Mapping kernel memory is permitted if the region in > > + * question is covered by a single memblock with the > > + * NOMAP attribute set: this enables the use of ACPI > > + * table overrides passed via initramfs. > > + * This particular use case only requires read access. > > + */ > > + fallthrough; > > + > > + case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE: > > + /* > > + * This would be unusual, but not problematic per se, > > + * as long as we take care not to create a writable > > + * mapping for executable code. > > + */ > > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO; > > + break; > > + > > + case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY: > > + /* > > + * ACPI reclaim memory is used to pass firmware tables > > + * and other data that is intended for consumption by > > + * the OS only, which may decide it wants to reclaim > > + * that memory and use it for something else. We never > > + * do that, but we usually add it to the linear map > > + * anyway, in which case we should use the existing > > + * mapping. > > + */ > > + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys)) > > + return (void __iomem *)__va(phys); > > + fallthrough; > > + > > + default: > > + if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB) > > + prot = PAGE_KERNEL; > > + else if ((region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WC) || > > + (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WT)) > > + prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL); > > I have to ask: why is write-through mapped to write-combined here? > IIUC, write-through ensures the copy in the cache and memory are always in sync. So, instead of using WB, non-cacheable WC is used as RISC-V doesn't really define these attributes. Let me know if this is not correct. > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return ioremap_prot(phys, size, pgprot_val(prot)); > > } > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > Like Andrew said in v1, too bad we can't merge that with arm64 instead > of duplicating. > I agree. But since acpi_os_ioremap() is supposed to be arch function, I kept is separate. Also, I need feedback from Ard whether we should make it common and where to add this common function. > But otherwise, you can add: > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> > Thanks! Sunil
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index d607ab0f7c6d..ac039cf8af7a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ config RISCV select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL select ARCH_HAS_VDSO_DATA + select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT select ARCH_STACKWALK diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c index 56cb2c986c48..e619edc8b0cc 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/acpi.c @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ */ #include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/efi.h> #include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/memblock.h> #include <linux/pci.h> -#include <linux/efi.h> int acpi_noirq = 1; /* skip ACPI IRQ initialization */ int acpi_disabled = 1; @@ -217,7 +218,89 @@ void __init __acpi_unmap_table(void __iomem *map, unsigned long size) void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size) { - return (void __iomem *)memremap(phys, size, MEMREMAP_WB); + efi_memory_desc_t *md, *region = NULL; + pgprot_t prot; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))) + return NULL; + + for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) { + u64 end = md->phys_addr + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT); + + if (phys < md->phys_addr || phys >= end) + continue; + + if (phys + size > end) { + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers multiple EFI memory regions\n"); + return NULL; + } + region = md; + break; + } + + /* + * It is fine for AML to remap regions that are not represented in the + * EFI memory map at all, as it only describes normal memory, and MMIO + * regions that require a virtual mapping to make them accessible to + * the EFI runtime services. + */ + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_IO; + if (region) { + switch (region->type) { + case EFI_LOADER_CODE: + case EFI_LOADER_DATA: + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE: + case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA: + case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY: + case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY: + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys) || + !memblock_is_region_memory(phys, size)) { + pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory\n"); + return NULL; + } + + /* + * Mapping kernel memory is permitted if the region in + * question is covered by a single memblock with the + * NOMAP attribute set: this enables the use of ACPI + * table overrides passed via initramfs. + * This particular use case only requires read access. + */ + fallthrough; + + case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE: + /* + * This would be unusual, but not problematic per se, + * as long as we take care not to create a writable + * mapping for executable code. + */ + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO; + break; + + case EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY: + /* + * ACPI reclaim memory is used to pass firmware tables + * and other data that is intended for consumption by + * the OS only, which may decide it wants to reclaim + * that memory and use it for something else. We never + * do that, but we usually add it to the linear map + * anyway, in which case we should use the existing + * mapping. + */ + if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys)) + return (void __iomem *)__va(phys); + fallthrough; + + default: + if (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB) + prot = PAGE_KERNEL; + else if ((region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WC) || + (region->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WT)) + prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL); + } + } + + return ioremap_prot(phys, size, pgprot_val(prot)); } #ifdef CONFIG_PCI