[v3] Crash: add lock to serialize crash hotplug handling

Message ID 20230926120905.392903-1-bhe@redhat.com
State New
Headers
Series [v3] Crash: add lock to serialize crash hotplug handling |

Commit Message

Baoquan He Sept. 26, 2023, 12:09 p.m. UTC
  Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.

=======
[   78.714569] Fallback order for Node 0: 0
[   78.714575] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 1817886
[   78.717133] Policy zone: Normal
[   78.724423] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
[   78.727207] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
[   80.056643] PEFILE: Unsigned PE binary
=======

The memory hotplug events are notified very quickly and very many,
while the handling of crash hotplug is much slower relatively. So the
atomic variable __kexec_lock and kexec_trylock() can't guarantee the
serialization of crash hotplug handling.

Here, add a new mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock to serialize crash
hotplug handling specifically. This doesn't impact the usage of
__kexec_lock.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
---
v2->v3:
 - crash_check_update_elfcorehdr() need take __crash_hotplug_lock
   too because there's tiny racing window when kexec_load interface
   is taken. Eric pointed out this.
v1->v2:
 - Move mutex lock definition into CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG ifdeffery
   scope in kernel/crash_core.c because the lock is only needed and
   used in that scope. Suggested by Eric.
 kernel/crash_core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
  

Comments

Andrew Morton Sept. 26, 2023, 8:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:09:05 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:

> Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
> failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
> period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.

I'm assuming that this failure is sufficiently likely so as to  justify a -stable
backport of the fix.   Please let me know if this is incorrect.
  
Eric DeVolder Sept. 26, 2023, 9:53 p.m. UTC | #2
On 9/26/23 15:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:09:05 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
>> failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
>> period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.
> 
> I'm assuming that this failure is sufficiently likely so as to  justify a -stable
> backport of the fix.   Please let me know if this is incorrect.

Andrew,
Correct, this is sufficiently likely to happen.
Thanks,
eric
  
Baoquan He Sept. 27, 2023, 12:14 a.m. UTC | #3
On 09/26/23 at 04:53pm, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/26/23 15:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 20:09:05 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
> > > failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
> > > period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.
> > 
> > I'm assuming that this failure is sufficiently likely so as to  justify a -stable
> > backport of the fix.   Please let me know if this is incorrect.
> 
> Andrew,
> Correct, this is sufficiently likely to happen.

Agree. Maybe a Fixes tag need be added:
===
Fixes: 247262756121 ("crash: add generic infrastructure for crash hotplug support")
  
Valentin Schneider Sept. 28, 2023, 8:51 a.m. UTC | #4
On 26/09/23 20:09, Baoquan He wrote:
> Eric reported that handling corresponding crash hotplug event can be
> failed easily when many memory hotplug event are notified in a short
> period. They failed because failing to take __kexec_lock.
>
> =======
> [   78.714569] Fallback order for Node 0: 0
> [   78.714575] Built 1 zonelists, mobility grouping on.  Total pages: 1817886
> [   78.717133] Policy zone: Normal
> [   78.724423] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [   78.727207] crash hp: kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate
> [   80.056643] PEFILE: Unsigned PE binary
> =======
>
> The memory hotplug events are notified very quickly and very many,
> while the handling of crash hotplug is much slower relatively. So the
> atomic variable __kexec_lock and kexec_trylock() can't guarantee the
> serialization of crash hotplug handling.
>
> Here, add a new mutex lock __crash_hotplug_lock to serialize crash
> hotplug handling specifically. This doesn't impact the usage of
> __kexec_lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/crash_core.c b/kernel/crash_core.c
index 03a7932cde0a..2f675ef045d4 100644
--- a/kernel/crash_core.c
+++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
@@ -739,6 +739,17 @@  subsys_initcall(crash_notes_memory_init);
 #undef pr_fmt
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "crash hp: " fmt
 
+/*
+ * Different than kexec/kdump loading/unloading/jumping/shrinking which
+ * usually rarely happen, there will be many crash hotplug events notified
+ * during one short period, e.g one memory board is hot added and memory
+ * regions are online. So mutex lock  __crash_hotplug_lock is used to
+ * serialize the crash hotplug handling specifically.
+ */
+DEFINE_MUTEX(__crash_hotplug_lock);
+#define crash_hotplug_lock() mutex_lock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
+#define crash_hotplug_unlock() mutex_unlock(&__crash_hotplug_lock)
+
 /*
  * This routine utilized when the crash_hotplug sysfs node is read.
  * It reflects the kernel's ability/permission to update the crash
@@ -748,9 +759,11 @@  int crash_check_update_elfcorehdr(void)
 {
 	int rc = 0;
 
+	crash_hotplug_lock();
 	/* Obtain lock while reading crash information */
 	if (!kexec_trylock()) {
 		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
+		crash_hotplug_unlock();
 		return 0;
 	}
 	if (kexec_crash_image) {
@@ -761,6 +774,7 @@  int crash_check_update_elfcorehdr(void)
 	}
 	/* Release lock now that update complete */
 	kexec_unlock();
+	crash_hotplug_unlock();
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -783,9 +797,11 @@  static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct kimage *image;
 
+	crash_hotplug_lock();
 	/* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
 	if (!kexec_trylock()) {
 		pr_info("kexec_trylock() failed, elfcorehdr may be inaccurate\n");
+		crash_hotplug_unlock();
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -852,6 +868,7 @@  static void crash_handle_hotplug_event(unsigned int hp_action, unsigned int cpu)
 out:
 	/* Release lock now that update complete */
 	kexec_unlock();
+	crash_hotplug_unlock();
 }
 
 static int crash_memhp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *v)