[tty,v1,22/74] serial: bcm63xx-uart: Use port lock wrappers

Message ID 20230914183831.587273-23-john.ogness@linutronix.de
State New
Headers
Series serial: wrappers for uart port lock |

Commit Message

John Ogness Sept. 14, 2023, 6:37 p.m. UTC
  From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

When a serial port is used for kernel console output, then all
modifications to the UART registers which are done from other contexts,
e.g. getty, termios, are interference points for the kernel console.

So far this has been ignored and the printk output is based on the
principle of hope. The rework of the console infrastructure which aims to
support threaded and atomic consoles, requires to mark sections which
modify the UART registers as unsafe. This allows the atomic write function
to make informed decisions and eventually to restore operational state. It
also allows to prevent the regular UART code from modifying UART registers
while printk output is in progress.

All modifications of UART registers are guarded by the UART port lock,
which provides an obvious synchronization point with the console
infrastructure.

To avoid adding this functionality to all UART drivers, wrap the
spin_[un]lock*() invocations for uart_port::lock into helper functions
which just contain the spin_[un]lock*() invocations for now. In a
subsequent step these helpers will gain the console synchronization
mechanisms.

Converted with coccinelle. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Florian Fainelli Sept. 14, 2023, 9:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/14/23 11:37, John Ogness wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> When a serial port is used for kernel console output, then all
> modifications to the UART registers which are done from other contexts,
> e.g. getty, termios, are interference points for the kernel console.
> 
> So far this has been ignored and the printk output is based on the
> principle of hope. The rework of the console infrastructure which aims to
> support threaded and atomic consoles, requires to mark sections which
> modify the UART registers as unsafe. This allows the atomic write function
> to make informed decisions and eventually to restore operational state. It
> also allows to prevent the regular UART code from modifying UART registers
> while printk output is in progress.
> 
> All modifications of UART registers are guarded by the UART port lock,
> which provides an obvious synchronization point with the console
> infrastructure.
> 
> To avoid adding this functionality to all UART drivers, wrap the
> spin_[un]lock*() invocations for uart_port::lock into helper functions
> which just contain the spin_[un]lock*() invocations for now. In a
> subsequent step these helpers will gain the console synchronization
> mechanisms.
> 
> Converted with coccinelle. No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
index 0dd8cceb837c..4a08fd5ee61b 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@  static void bcm_uart_break_ctl(struct uart_port *port, int ctl)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int val;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+	uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
 
 	val = bcm_uart_readl(port, UART_CTL_REG);
 	if (ctl)
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@  static void bcm_uart_break_ctl(struct uart_port *port, int ctl)
 		val &= ~UART_CTL_XMITBRK_MASK;
 	bcm_uart_writel(port, val, UART_CTL_REG);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+	uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@  static irqreturn_t bcm_uart_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	unsigned int irqstat;
 
 	port = dev_id;
-	spin_lock(&port->lock);
+	uart_port_lock(port);
 
 	irqstat = bcm_uart_readl(port, UART_IR_REG);
 	if (irqstat & UART_RX_INT_STAT)
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@  static irqreturn_t bcm_uart_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 					       estat & UART_EXTINP_DCD_MASK);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(&port->lock);
+	uart_port_unlock(port);
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
@@ -451,9 +451,9 @@  static void bcm_uart_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+	uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
 	bcm_uart_writel(port, 0, UART_IR_REG);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+	uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
 
 	bcm_uart_disable(port);
 	bcm_uart_flush(port);
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@  static void bcm_uart_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *new,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int tries;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
+	uart_port_lock_irqsave(port, &flags);
 
 	/* Drain the hot tub fully before we power it off for the winter. */
 	for (tries = 3; !bcm_uart_tx_empty(port) && tries; tries--)
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@  static void bcm_uart_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *new,
 
 	uart_update_timeout(port, new->c_cflag, baud);
 	bcm_uart_enable(port);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->lock, flags);
+	uart_port_unlock_irqrestore(port, flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -712,9 +712,9 @@  static void bcm_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
 		/* bcm_uart_interrupt() already took the lock */
 		locked = 0;
 	} else if (oops_in_progress) {
-		locked = spin_trylock(&port->lock);
+		locked = uart_port_trylock(port);
 	} else {
-		spin_lock(&port->lock);
+		uart_port_lock(port);
 		locked = 1;
 	}
 
@@ -725,7 +725,7 @@  static void bcm_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
 	wait_for_xmitr(port);
 
 	if (locked)
-		spin_unlock(&port->lock);
+		uart_port_unlock(port);
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }