diff mbox series

[v4,02/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when determining rate

Message ID 20230717-pll-mipi_set_rate_parent-v4-2-04acf1d39765@oltmanns.dev
State New
Headers
Series clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate |

Commit Message

Frank Oltmanns July 17, 2023, 1:34 p.m. UTC 
  In case the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set, consider using a different
parent rate when determining a new rate.

To find the best match for the requested rate, perform the following
steps for each NKM combination:
 - calculate the optimal parent rate,
 - find the best parent rate that the parent clock actually supports
 - use that parent rate to calculate the effective rate.

In case the clk does not support setting the parent rate, use the same
algorithm as before.

Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
---
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Maxime Ripard July 17, 2023, 2:07 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 15:34:26 +0200, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
> In case the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set, consider using a different
> parent rate when determining a new rate.
> 
> To find the best match for the requested rate, perform the following
> steps for each NKM combination:
> 
> [ ... ]

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Thanks!
Maxime
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
index f267142e58b3..750e2b8da24b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ 
 
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/math.h>
 
 #include "ccu_gate.h"
 #include "ccu_nkm.h"
@@ -16,6 +17,44 @@  struct _ccu_nkm {
 	unsigned long	m, min_m, max_m;
 };
 
+static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struct _ccu_nkm *nkm,
+						       unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate)
+{
+	unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = *parent, tmp_parent = *parent;
+	unsigned long best_n = 0, best_k = 0, best_m = 0;
+	unsigned long _n, _k, _m;
+
+	for (_k = nkm->min_k; _k <= nkm->max_k; _k++) {
+		for (_n = nkm->min_n; _n <= nkm->max_n; _n++) {
+			for (_m = nkm->min_m; _m <= nkm->max_m; _m++) {
+				unsigned long tmp_rate;
+
+				tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(phw, rate * _m / (_n * _k));
+
+				tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
+				if (tmp_rate > rate)
+					continue;
+
+				if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
+					best_rate = tmp_rate;
+					best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
+					best_n = _n;
+					best_k = _k;
+					best_m = _m;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	nkm->n = best_n;
+	nkm->k = best_k;
+	nkm->m = best_m;
+
+	*parent = best_parent_rate;
+
+	return best_rate;
+}
+
 static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
 				       struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
 {
@@ -124,7 +163,10 @@  static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
 	if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
 		rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
 
-	rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+	if (!clk_hw_can_set_rate_parent(&nkm->common.hw))
+		rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+	else
+		rate = ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(parent_hw, &_nkm, parent_rate, rate);
 
 	if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
 		rate /= nkm->fixed_post_div;