[4/9] iommu: Change the return value of dev_iommu_get()
Commit Message
Make dev_iommu_get() return 0 for success and error numbers for failure.
This will make the code neat and readable. No functionality changes.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Comments
Hi BaoLu,
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:06:37 +0800, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
wrote:
> Make dev_iommu_get() return 0 for success and error numbers for failure.
> This will make the code neat and readable. No functionality changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 41328f03e8b4..65895b987e22 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -287,20 +287,20 @@ void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device
> *iommu) }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_device_unregister);
>
> -static struct dev_iommu *dev_iommu_get(struct device *dev)
> +static int dev_iommu_get(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
>
> if (param)
> - return param;
> + return 0;
>
> param = kzalloc(sizeof(*param), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!param)
> - return NULL;
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> mutex_init(¶m->lock);
> dev->iommu = param;
> - return param;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void dev_iommu_free(struct device *dev)
> @@ -351,10 +351,9 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev,
> struct list_head *group_list
> * but for now enforcing a simple global ordering is fine.
> */
> mutex_lock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
> - if (!dev_iommu_get(dev)) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> + ret = dev_iommu_get(dev);
> + if (ret)
> goto err_unlock;
> - }
>
> if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -2751,12 +2750,14 @@ int iommu_fwspec_init(struct device *dev, struct
> fwnode_handle *iommu_fwnode, const struct iommu_ops *ops)
> {
> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
> + int ret;
>
> if (fwspec)
> return ops == fwspec->ops ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>
> - if (!dev_iommu_get(dev))
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + ret = dev_iommu_get(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> /* Preallocate for the overwhelmingly common case of 1 ID */
> fwspec = kzalloc(struct_size(fwspec, ids, 1), GFP_KERNEL);
Reviewed-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Thanks,
Jacob
@@ -287,20 +287,20 @@ void iommu_device_unregister(struct iommu_device *iommu)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_device_unregister);
-static struct dev_iommu *dev_iommu_get(struct device *dev)
+static int dev_iommu_get(struct device *dev)
{
struct dev_iommu *param = dev->iommu;
if (param)
- return param;
+ return 0;
param = kzalloc(sizeof(*param), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!param)
- return NULL;
+ return -ENOMEM;
mutex_init(¶m->lock);
dev->iommu = param;
- return param;
+ return 0;
}
static void dev_iommu_free(struct device *dev)
@@ -351,10 +351,9 @@ static int __iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev, struct list_head *group_list
* but for now enforcing a simple global ordering is fine.
*/
mutex_lock(&iommu_probe_device_lock);
- if (!dev_iommu_get(dev)) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
+ ret = dev_iommu_get(dev);
+ if (ret)
goto err_unlock;
- }
if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -2751,12 +2750,14 @@ int iommu_fwspec_init(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *iommu_fwnode,
const struct iommu_ops *ops)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
+ int ret;
if (fwspec)
return ops == fwspec->ops ? 0 : -EINVAL;
- if (!dev_iommu_get(dev))
- return -ENOMEM;
+ ret = dev_iommu_get(dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
/* Preallocate for the overwhelmingly common case of 1 ID */
fwspec = kzalloc(struct_size(fwspec, ids, 1), GFP_KERNEL);