[v2,06/24] dma-buf: system_heap: use vmalloc_array and vcalloc

Message ID 20230627144339.144478-7-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr
State New
Headers
Series use vmalloc_array and vcalloc |

Commit Message

Julia Lawall June 27, 2023, 2:43 p.m. UTC
  Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc to protect against
multiplication overflows.

The changes were done using the following Coccinelle
semantic patch:

// <smpl>
@initialize:ocaml@
@@

let rename alloc =
  match alloc with
    "vmalloc" -> "vmalloc_array"
  | "vzalloc" -> "vcalloc"
  | _ -> failwith "unknown"

@@
    size_t e1,e2;
    constant C1, C2;
    expression E1, E2, COUNT, x1, x2, x3;
    typedef u8;
    typedef __u8;
    type t = {u8,__u8,char,unsigned char};
    identifier alloc = {vmalloc,vzalloc};
    fresh identifier realloc = script:ocaml(alloc) { rename alloc };
@@

(
      alloc(x1*x2*x3)
|
      alloc(C1 * C2)
|
      alloc((sizeof(t)) * (COUNT), ...)
|
-     alloc((e1) * (e2))
+     realloc(e1, e2)
|
-     alloc((e1) * (COUNT))
+     realloc(COUNT, e1)
|
-     alloc((E1) * (E2))
+     realloc(E1, E2)
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>

---
v2: Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc instead of array_size.
This also leaves a multiplication of a constant by a sizeof
as is.  Two patches are thus dropped from the series.

 drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

John Stultz June 27, 2023, 6:52 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 7:44 AM Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc to protect against
> multiplication overflows.
>
> The changes were done using the following Coccinelle
> semantic patch:
>
> // <smpl>
> @initialize:ocaml@
> @@
>
> let rename alloc =
>   match alloc with
>     "vmalloc" -> "vmalloc_array"
>   | "vzalloc" -> "vcalloc"
>   | _ -> failwith "unknown"
>
> @@
>     size_t e1,e2;
>     constant C1, C2;
>     expression E1, E2, COUNT, x1, x2, x3;
>     typedef u8;
>     typedef __u8;
>     type t = {u8,__u8,char,unsigned char};
>     identifier alloc = {vmalloc,vzalloc};
>     fresh identifier realloc = script:ocaml(alloc) { rename alloc };
> @@
>
> (
>       alloc(x1*x2*x3)
> |
>       alloc(C1 * C2)
> |
>       alloc((sizeof(t)) * (COUNT), ...)
> |
> -     alloc((e1) * (e2))
> +     realloc(e1, e2)
> |
> -     alloc((e1) * (COUNT))
> +     realloc(COUNT, e1)
> |
> -     alloc((E1) * (E2))
> +     realloc(E1, E2)
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
>
> ---
> v2: Use vmalloc_array and vcalloc instead of array_size.
> This also leaves a multiplication of a constant by a sizeof
> as is.  Two patches are thus dropped from the series.
>
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -u -p a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static void *system_heap_do_vmap(struct
>  {
>         struct sg_table *table = &buffer->sg_table;
>         int npages = PAGE_ALIGN(buffer->len) / PAGE_SIZE;
> -       struct page **pages = vmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) * npages);
> +       struct page **pages = vmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(struct page *));
>         struct page **tmp = pages;
>         struct sg_page_iter piter;
>         void *vaddr;

Seems reasonable. Thanks for sending this out!

Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>

thanks
-john
  

Patch

diff -u -p a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@  static void *system_heap_do_vmap(struct
 {
 	struct sg_table *table = &buffer->sg_table;
 	int npages = PAGE_ALIGN(buffer->len) / PAGE_SIZE;
-	struct page **pages = vmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) * npages);
+	struct page **pages = vmalloc_array(npages, sizeof(struct page *));
 	struct page **tmp = pages;
 	struct sg_page_iter piter;
 	void *vaddr;