[bpf-next,1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc

Message ID 20230610035053.117605-1-void@manifault.com
State New
Headers
Series [bpf-next,1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc |

Commit Message

David Vernet June 10, 2023, 3:50 a.m. UTC
  We currently provide bpf_cpumask_first(), bpf_cpumask_any(), and
bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs. bpf_cpumask_any() and
bpf_cpumask_any_and() are confusing misnomers in that they actually just
call cpumask_first() and cpumask_first_and() respectively.

We'll replace them with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and
bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and() kfuncs in a subsequent patch, so let's
ensure feature parity by adding a bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc to
account for bpf_cpumask_any_and() being removed.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/cpumask.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
  

Comments

Yonghong Song June 12, 2023, 3:19 p.m. UTC | #1
On 6/9/23 8:50 PM, David Vernet wrote:
> We currently provide bpf_cpumask_first(), bpf_cpumask_any(), and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs. bpf_cpumask_any() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() are confusing misnomers in that they actually just
> call cpumask_first() and cpumask_first_and() respectively.
> 
> We'll replace them with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and() kfuncs in a subsequent patch, so let's
> ensure feature parity by adding a bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc to
> account for bpf_cpumask_any_and() being removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
  
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org June 12, 2023, 10:20 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Fri,  9 Jun 2023 22:50:49 -0500 you wrote:
> We currently provide bpf_cpumask_first(), bpf_cpumask_any(), and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() kfuncs. bpf_cpumask_any() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_and() are confusing misnomers in that they actually just
> call cpumask_first() and cpumask_first_and() respectively.
> 
> We'll replace them with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute() and
> bpf_cpumask_any_distribute_and() kfuncs in a subsequent patch, so let's
> ensure feature parity by adding a bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc to
> account for bpf_cpumask_any_and() being removed.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/5] bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5ba3a7a851e3
  - [bpf-next,2/5] selftests/bpf: Add test for new bpf_cpumask_first_and() kfunc
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/58476d8a24bd
  - [bpf-next,3/5] bpf: Replace bpf_cpumask_any* with bpf_cpumask_any_distribute*
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f983be917332
  - [bpf-next,4/5] selftests/bpf: Update bpf_cpumask_any* tests to use bpf_cpumask_any_distribute*
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5a73efc7d1b4
  - [bpf-next,5/5] bpf/docs: Update documentation for new cpumask kfuncs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/25085b4e9251

You are awesome, thank you!
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cpumask.c b/kernel/bpf/cpumask.c
index 7efdf5d770ca..9416c8ac8a04 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/cpumask.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/cpumask.c
@@ -131,6 +131,21 @@  __bpf_kfunc u32 bpf_cpumask_first_zero(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
 	return cpumask_first_zero(cpumask);
 }
 
+/**
+ * bpf_cpumask_first_and() - Return the index of the first nonzero bit from the
+ *			     AND of two cpumasks.
+ * @src1: The first cpumask.
+ * @src2: The second cpumask.
+ *
+ * Find the index of the first nonzero bit of the AND of two cpumasks.
+ * struct bpf_cpumask pointers may be safely passed to @src1 and @src2.
+ */
+__bpf_kfunc u32 bpf_cpumask_first_and(const struct cpumask *src1,
+				      const struct cpumask *src2)
+{
+	return cpumask_first_and(src1, src2);
+}
+
 /**
  * bpf_cpumask_set_cpu() - Set a bit for a CPU in a BPF cpumask.
  * @cpu: The CPU to be set in the cpumask.
@@ -406,6 +421,7 @@  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_release, KF_RELEASE)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_first, KF_RCU)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_first_zero, KF_RCU)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_first_and, KF_RCU)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_set_cpu, KF_RCU)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_clear_cpu, KF_RCU)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cpumask_test_cpu, KF_RCU)