diff mbox series

[v1,-next,2/2] RISC-V/perf: Use standard interface to get INTC domain

Message ID 20230605143512.707533-3-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com
State New
Headers
Series RISC-V ACPI: Assorted fixes |

Commit Message

Sunil V L June 5, 2023, 2:35 p.m. UTC 
  Currently the PMU driver is using DT based lookup to
find the INTC node for sscofpmf extension. This will not work
for ACPI based systems causing the driver to fail to register
the PMU overflow interrupt handler.

Hence, change the code to use the standard interface to find
the INTC node which works irrespective of DT or ACPI.

Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
---
 drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 17 ++---------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Conor Dooley June 6, 2023, 3:49 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:05:12PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> Currently the PMU driver is using DT based lookup to
> find the INTC node for sscofpmf extension. This will not work
> for ACPI based systems causing the driver to fail to register
> the PMU overflow interrupt handler.
> 
> Hence, change the code to use the standard interface to find
> the INTC node which works irrespective of DT or ACPI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 17 ++---------------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 4f3ac296b3e2..0bc491252a44 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -739,7 +739,6 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	struct cpu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
> -	struct device_node *cpu, *child;
>  	struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
>  
>  	if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) {
> @@ -756,20 +755,8 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
>  	if (!riscv_pmu_use_irq)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> -	for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu) {
> -		child = of_get_compatible_child(cpu, "riscv,cpu-intc");
> -		if (!child) {
> -			pr_err("Failed to find INTC node\n");
> -			of_node_put(cpu);
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		}
> -		domain = irq_find_host(child);
> -		of_node_put(child);
> -		if (domain) {
> -			of_node_put(cpu);
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(),
> +					  DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);

This riscv_get_intc_hwnode stuff is horrific, but that's besides the
point.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

>  	if (!domain) {
>  		pr_err("Failed to find INTC IRQ root domain\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
index 4f3ac296b3e2..0bc491252a44 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
@@ -739,7 +739,6 @@  static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct cpu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
-	struct device_node *cpu, *child;
 	struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
 
 	if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) {
@@ -756,20 +755,8 @@  static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
 	if (!riscv_pmu_use_irq)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu) {
-		child = of_get_compatible_child(cpu, "riscv,cpu-intc");
-		if (!child) {
-			pr_err("Failed to find INTC node\n");
-			of_node_put(cpu);
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
-		domain = irq_find_host(child);
-		of_node_put(child);
-		if (domain) {
-			of_node_put(cpu);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(),
+					  DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
 	if (!domain) {
 		pr_err("Failed to find INTC IRQ root domain\n");
 		return -ENODEV;