[03/12] selftests/mm: fix unused variable warning in migration.c

Message ID 20230602013358.900637-4-jhubbard@nvidia.com
State New
Headers
Series A minor flurry of selftest/mm fixes |

Commit Message

John Hubbard June 2, 2023, 1:33 a.m. UTC
  Declare the variable as volatile, in order to avoid the clang compiler
warning.

Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

David Hildenbrand June 2, 2023, 10:02 a.m. UTC | #1
On 02.06.23 03:33, John Hubbard wrote:
> Declare the variable as volatile, in order to avoid the clang compiler
> warning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
> index 1cec8425e3ca..2dede662ff43 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int migrate(uint64_t *ptr, int n1, int n2)
>   
>   void *access_mem(void *ptr)
>   {
> -	uint64_t y = 0;
> +	volatile uint64_t y = 0;
>   	volatile uint64_t *x = ptr;
>   
>   	while (1) {

Same comment as for previous patch.
  
John Hubbard June 2, 2023, 6:39 p.m. UTC | #2
On 6/2/23 03:02, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 02.06.23 03:33, John Hubbard wrote:
>> Declare the variable as volatile, in order to avoid the clang compiler
>> warning.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
>> index 1cec8425e3ca..2dede662ff43 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
>> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int migrate(uint64_t *ptr, int n1, int n2)
>>   void *access_mem(void *ptr)
>>   {
>> -    uint64_t y = 0;
>> +    volatile uint64_t y = 0;
>>       volatile uint64_t *x = ptr;
>>       while (1) {
> 
> Same comment as for previous patch.
> 

Yes. In fact I'll merge this one into the previous patch, since
they are so similar and small, and have the same fix approach.

thanks,
  

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
index 1cec8425e3ca..2dede662ff43 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/migration.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@  int migrate(uint64_t *ptr, int n1, int n2)
 
 void *access_mem(void *ptr)
 {
-	uint64_t y = 0;
+	volatile uint64_t y = 0;
 	volatile uint64_t *x = ptr;
 
 	while (1) {