[v4,4/5] erofs: unify inline/share xattr iterators for listxattr/getxattr

Message ID 20230531031330.3504-5-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
State New
Headers
Series erofs: cleanup of xattr handling |

Commit Message

Jingbo Xu May 31, 2023, 3:13 a.m. UTC
  Make inline_getxattr() and inline_listxattr() unified as
iter_inline_xattr(), shared_getxattr() and shared_listxattr() unified as
iter_shared_xattr().

After the unification, both iter_inline_xattr() and iter_shared_xattr()
return 0 on success, and negative error on failure.

One thing worth noting is that, the logic of returning it->buffer_ofs
when there's no shared xattrs in shared_listxattr() is moved to
erofs_listxattr() to make the unification possible.  The only difference
is that, semantically the old behavior will return ENOATTR rather than
it->buffer_ofs if ENOATTR encountered when listxattr is parsing upon a
specific shared xattr, while now the new behavior will return
it->buffer_ofs in this case.  This is not an issue, as listxattr upon a
specific xattr won't return ENOATTR.

Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/erofs/xattr.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Gao Xiang May 31, 2023, 6:57 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2023/5/31 11:13, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> Make inline_getxattr() and inline_listxattr() unified as
> iter_inline_xattr(), shared_getxattr() and shared_listxattr() unified as
> iter_shared_xattr().
> 
> After the unification, both iter_inline_xattr() and iter_shared_xattr()
> return 0 on success, and negative error on failure.
> 
> One thing worth noting is that, the logic of returning it->buffer_ofs
> when there's no shared xattrs in shared_listxattr() is moved to
> erofs_listxattr() to make the unification possible.  The only difference
> is that, semantically the old behavior will return ENOATTR rather than
> it->buffer_ofs if ENOATTR encountered when listxattr is parsing upon a
> specific shared xattr, while now the new behavior will return
> it->buffer_ofs in this case.  This is not an issue, as listxattr upon a
> specific xattr won't return ENOATTR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   fs/erofs/xattr.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>   1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> index 7c76b4d31920..074743e2b271 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
> @@ -7,19 +7,6 @@
>   #include <linux/security.h>
>   #include "xattr.h"
>   
> -static inline erofs_blk_t erofs_xattr_blkaddr(struct super_block *sb,
> -					      unsigned int xattr_id)
> -{
> -	return EROFS_SB(sb)->xattr_blkaddr +
> -	       erofs_blknr(sb, xattr_id * sizeof(__u32));
> -}
> -
> -static inline unsigned int erofs_xattr_blkoff(struct super_block *sb,
> -					      unsigned int xattr_id)
> -{
> -	return erofs_blkoff(sb, xattr_id * sizeof(__u32));
> -}
> -
>   struct erofs_xattr_iter {
>   	struct super_block *sb;
>   	struct erofs_buf buf;
> @@ -170,30 +157,6 @@ struct xattr_iter_handlers {
>   		      unsigned int len);
>   };
>   
> -static int inline_xattr_iter_begin(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
> -				   struct inode *inode)
> -{
> -	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
> -	unsigned int xattr_header_sz, inline_xattr_ofs;
> -
> -	xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
> -			  sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
> -	if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
> -		DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
> -		return -ENOATTR;
> -	}
> -
> -	inline_xattr_ofs = vi->inode_isize + xattr_header_sz;
> -
> -	it->blkaddr = erofs_blknr(it->sb, erofs_iloc(inode) + inline_xattr_ofs);
> -	it->ofs = erofs_blkoff(it->sb, erofs_iloc(inode) + inline_xattr_ofs);
> -	it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, inode->i_sb, it->blkaddr,
> -				       EROFS_KMAP);
> -	if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
> -		return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
> -	return vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz;
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Regardless of success or failure, `xattr_foreach' will end up with
>    * `ofs' pointing to the next xattr item rather than an arbitrary position.
> @@ -355,46 +318,6 @@ static const struct xattr_iter_handlers find_xattr_handlers = {
>   	.value = xattr_copyvalue
>   };
>   
> -static int inline_getxattr(struct inode *inode, struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -	unsigned int remaining;
> -
> -	ret = inline_xattr_iter_begin(it, inode);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	remaining = ret;
> -	while (remaining) {
> -		ret = xattr_foreach(it, &find_xattr_handlers, &remaining);
> -		if (ret != -ENOATTR)
> -			break;
> -	}
> -	return ret ? ret : it->buffer_ofs;
> -}
> -
> -static int shared_getxattr(struct inode *inode, struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
> -{
> -	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
> -	struct super_block *const sb = it->sb;
> -	unsigned int i, xsid;
> -	int ret = -ENOATTR;
> -
> -	for (i = 0; i < vi->xattr_shared_count; ++i) {
> -		xsid = vi->xattr_shared_xattrs[i];
> -		it->blkaddr = erofs_xattr_blkaddr(sb, xsid);
> -		it->ofs = erofs_xattr_blkoff(sb, xsid);
> -		it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, sb, it->blkaddr, EROFS_KMAP);
> -		if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
> -			return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
> -
> -		ret = xattr_foreach(it, &find_xattr_handlers, NULL);
> -		if (ret != -ENOATTR)
> -			break;
> -	}
> -	return ret ? ret : it->buffer_ofs;
> -}
> -
>   static bool erofs_xattr_user_list(struct dentry *dentry)
>   {
>   	return test_opt(&EROFS_SB(dentry->d_sb)->opt, XATTR_USER);
> @@ -405,39 +328,6 @@ static bool erofs_xattr_trusted_list(struct dentry *dentry)
>   	return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
>   }
>   
> -int erofs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, int index,
> -		   const char *name,
> -		   void *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
> -{
> -	int ret;
> -	struct erofs_xattr_iter it;
> -
> -	if (!name)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	ret = erofs_init_inode_xattrs(inode);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	it.index = index;
> -	it.name = (struct qstr)QSTR_INIT(name, strlen(name));
> -	if (it.name.len > EROFS_NAME_LEN)
> -		return -ERANGE;
> -
> -	it.sb = inode->i_sb;
> -	it.buf = __EROFS_BUF_INITIALIZER;
> -	erofs_init_metabuf(&it.buf, it.sb);
> -	it.buffer = buffer;
> -	it.buffer_size = buffer_size;
> -	it.buffer_ofs = 0;
> -
> -	ret = inline_getxattr(inode, &it);
> -	if (ret == -ENOATTR)
> -		ret = shared_getxattr(inode, &it);
> -	erofs_put_metabuf(&it.buf);
> -	return ret;
> -}
> -
>   static int erofs_xattr_generic_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
>   				   struct dentry *unused, struct inode *inode,
>   				   const char *name, void *buffer, size_t size)
> @@ -542,45 +432,98 @@ static const struct xattr_iter_handlers list_xattr_handlers = {
>   	.value = NULL
>   };
>   
> -static int inline_listxattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
> +static int erofs_iter_inline_xattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
> +				   struct inode *inode, bool getxattr)
>   {
> +	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
> +	const struct xattr_iter_handlers *op;
> +	unsigned int xattr_header_sz, remaining;
> +	erofs_off_t pos;
>   	int ret;
> -	unsigned int remaining;
>   
> -	ret = inline_xattr_iter_begin(it, d_inode(it->dentry));

In the past, "ret" here is "an int", and
	vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz < 0 will return
negative value (although I think that value is problematic).

see below.


> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +	xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
> +			  sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
> +	if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
> +		DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
> +		return -ENOATTR;
> +	}
> +
> +	pos = erofs_iloc(inode) + vi->inode_isize + xattr_header_sz;
> +	it->blkaddr = erofs_blknr(it->sb, pos);
> +	it->ofs = erofs_blkoff(it->sb, pos);
> +	it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, it->sb, it->blkaddr, EROFS_KMAP);
> +	if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
> +		return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
> +
> +	remaining = vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz;

so in this patch, `vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz` here could be
negative that should be avoided as well.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang
  
Jingbo Xu May 31, 2023, 8:16 a.m. UTC | #2
On 5/31/23 2:57 PM, Gao Xiang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/5/31 11:13, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>   -static int inline_xattr_iter_begin(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
>> -                   struct inode *inode)
>> -{
>> -    struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
>> -    unsigned int xattr_header_sz, inline_xattr_ofs;
>> -
>> -    xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
>> -              sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
>> -    if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
>> -        DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
>> -        return -ENOATTR;
>> -    }

In the original implementation, here when xattr_header_sz >=
vi->xattr_isize, inline_xattr_iter_begin() will return -ENOATTR rather
than a negative integer (i.e. vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz).


>>   static int erofs_xattr_generic_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
>>                      struct dentry *unused, struct inode *inode,
>>                      const char *name, void *buffer, size_t size)
>> @@ -542,45 +432,98 @@ static const struct xattr_iter_handlers
>> list_xattr_handlers = {
>>       .value = NULL
>>   };
>>   -static int inline_listxattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
>> +static int erofs_iter_inline_xattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
>> +                   struct inode *inode, bool getxattr)
>>   {
>> +    struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
>> +    const struct xattr_iter_handlers *op;
>> +    unsigned int xattr_header_sz, remaining;
>> +    erofs_off_t pos;
>>       int ret;
>> -    unsigned int remaining;
>>   -    ret = inline_xattr_iter_begin(it, d_inode(it->dentry));
> 
> In the past, "ret" here is "an int", and
>     vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz < 0 will return
> negative value (although I think that value is problematic).
> 
> see below.

See comment above.

> 
> 
>> -    if (ret < 0)
>> -        return ret;
>> +    xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
>> +              sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
>> +    if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
>> +        DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
>> +        return -ENOATTR;
>> +    }

This checking for "xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize" is also included
in this patch.
  
Gao Xiang May 31, 2023, 8:31 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2023/5/31 16:16, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/31/23 2:57 PM, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/5/31 11:13, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>>    -static int inline_xattr_iter_begin(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
>>> -                   struct inode *inode)
>>> -{
>>> -    struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
>>> -    unsigned int xattr_header_sz, inline_xattr_ofs;
>>> -
>>> -    xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
>>> -              sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
>>> -    if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
>>> -        DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
>>> -        return -ENOATTR;
>>> -    }
> 
> In the original implementation, here when xattr_header_sz >=
> vi->xattr_isize, inline_xattr_iter_begin() will return -ENOATTR rather
> than a negative integer (i.e. vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz).

Ah, sorry I misreaded that.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang
  

Patch

diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
index 7c76b4d31920..074743e2b271 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c
@@ -7,19 +7,6 @@ 
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include "xattr.h"
 
-static inline erofs_blk_t erofs_xattr_blkaddr(struct super_block *sb,
-					      unsigned int xattr_id)
-{
-	return EROFS_SB(sb)->xattr_blkaddr +
-	       erofs_blknr(sb, xattr_id * sizeof(__u32));
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int erofs_xattr_blkoff(struct super_block *sb,
-					      unsigned int xattr_id)
-{
-	return erofs_blkoff(sb, xattr_id * sizeof(__u32));
-}
-
 struct erofs_xattr_iter {
 	struct super_block *sb;
 	struct erofs_buf buf;
@@ -170,30 +157,6 @@  struct xattr_iter_handlers {
 		      unsigned int len);
 };
 
-static int inline_xattr_iter_begin(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
-				   struct inode *inode)
-{
-	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
-	unsigned int xattr_header_sz, inline_xattr_ofs;
-
-	xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
-			  sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
-	if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
-		DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
-		return -ENOATTR;
-	}
-
-	inline_xattr_ofs = vi->inode_isize + xattr_header_sz;
-
-	it->blkaddr = erofs_blknr(it->sb, erofs_iloc(inode) + inline_xattr_ofs);
-	it->ofs = erofs_blkoff(it->sb, erofs_iloc(inode) + inline_xattr_ofs);
-	it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, inode->i_sb, it->blkaddr,
-				       EROFS_KMAP);
-	if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
-		return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
-	return vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz;
-}
-
 /*
  * Regardless of success or failure, `xattr_foreach' will end up with
  * `ofs' pointing to the next xattr item rather than an arbitrary position.
@@ -355,46 +318,6 @@  static const struct xattr_iter_handlers find_xattr_handlers = {
 	.value = xattr_copyvalue
 };
 
-static int inline_getxattr(struct inode *inode, struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
-{
-	int ret;
-	unsigned int remaining;
-
-	ret = inline_xattr_iter_begin(it, inode);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-
-	remaining = ret;
-	while (remaining) {
-		ret = xattr_foreach(it, &find_xattr_handlers, &remaining);
-		if (ret != -ENOATTR)
-			break;
-	}
-	return ret ? ret : it->buffer_ofs;
-}
-
-static int shared_getxattr(struct inode *inode, struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
-{
-	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
-	struct super_block *const sb = it->sb;
-	unsigned int i, xsid;
-	int ret = -ENOATTR;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < vi->xattr_shared_count; ++i) {
-		xsid = vi->xattr_shared_xattrs[i];
-		it->blkaddr = erofs_xattr_blkaddr(sb, xsid);
-		it->ofs = erofs_xattr_blkoff(sb, xsid);
-		it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, sb, it->blkaddr, EROFS_KMAP);
-		if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
-			return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
-
-		ret = xattr_foreach(it, &find_xattr_handlers, NULL);
-		if (ret != -ENOATTR)
-			break;
-	}
-	return ret ? ret : it->buffer_ofs;
-}
-
 static bool erofs_xattr_user_list(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	return test_opt(&EROFS_SB(dentry->d_sb)->opt, XATTR_USER);
@@ -405,39 +328,6 @@  static bool erofs_xattr_trusted_list(struct dentry *dentry)
 	return capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN);
 }
 
-int erofs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, int index,
-		   const char *name,
-		   void *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
-{
-	int ret;
-	struct erofs_xattr_iter it;
-
-	if (!name)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	ret = erofs_init_inode_xattrs(inode);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	it.index = index;
-	it.name = (struct qstr)QSTR_INIT(name, strlen(name));
-	if (it.name.len > EROFS_NAME_LEN)
-		return -ERANGE;
-
-	it.sb = inode->i_sb;
-	it.buf = __EROFS_BUF_INITIALIZER;
-	erofs_init_metabuf(&it.buf, it.sb);
-	it.buffer = buffer;
-	it.buffer_size = buffer_size;
-	it.buffer_ofs = 0;
-
-	ret = inline_getxattr(inode, &it);
-	if (ret == -ENOATTR)
-		ret = shared_getxattr(inode, &it);
-	erofs_put_metabuf(&it.buf);
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int erofs_xattr_generic_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
 				   struct dentry *unused, struct inode *inode,
 				   const char *name, void *buffer, size_t size)
@@ -542,45 +432,98 @@  static const struct xattr_iter_handlers list_xattr_handlers = {
 	.value = NULL
 };
 
-static int inline_listxattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
+static int erofs_iter_inline_xattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
+				   struct inode *inode, bool getxattr)
 {
+	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
+	const struct xattr_iter_handlers *op;
+	unsigned int xattr_header_sz, remaining;
+	erofs_off_t pos;
 	int ret;
-	unsigned int remaining;
 
-	ret = inline_xattr_iter_begin(it, d_inode(it->dentry));
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+	xattr_header_sz = sizeof(struct erofs_xattr_ibody_header) +
+			  sizeof(u32) * vi->xattr_shared_count;
+	if (xattr_header_sz >= vi->xattr_isize) {
+		DBG_BUGON(xattr_header_sz > vi->xattr_isize);
+		return -ENOATTR;
+	}
+
+	pos = erofs_iloc(inode) + vi->inode_isize + xattr_header_sz;
+	it->blkaddr = erofs_blknr(it->sb, pos);
+	it->ofs = erofs_blkoff(it->sb, pos);
+	it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, it->sb, it->blkaddr, EROFS_KMAP);
+	if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
+		return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
+
+	remaining = vi->xattr_isize - xattr_header_sz;
+	op = getxattr ? &find_xattr_handlers : &list_xattr_handlers;
 
-	remaining = ret;
 	while (remaining) {
-		ret = xattr_foreach(it, &list_xattr_handlers, &remaining);
-		if (ret)
+		ret = xattr_foreach(it, op, &remaining);
+		if ((getxattr && ret != -ENOATTR) || (!getxattr && ret))
 			break;
 	}
-	return ret ? ret : it->buffer_ofs;
+	return ret;
 }
 
-static int shared_listxattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it)
+static int erofs_iter_shared_xattr(struct erofs_xattr_iter *it,
+				   struct inode *inode, bool getxattr)
 {
-	struct inode *const inode = d_inode(it->dentry);
 	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(inode);
 	struct super_block *const sb = it->sb;
+	const struct xattr_iter_handlers *op;
 	unsigned int i, xsid;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret = -ENOATTR;
+
+	op = getxattr ? &find_xattr_handlers : &list_xattr_handlers;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < vi->xattr_shared_count; ++i) {
 		xsid = vi->xattr_shared_xattrs[i];
-		it->blkaddr = erofs_xattr_blkaddr(sb, xsid);
-		it->ofs = erofs_xattr_blkoff(sb, xsid);
+		it->blkaddr = EROFS_SB(sb)->xattr_blkaddr +
+			      erofs_blknr(sb, xsid * sizeof(__u32));
+		it->ofs = erofs_blkoff(sb, xsid * sizeof(__u32));
 		it->kaddr = erofs_read_metabuf(&it->buf, sb, it->blkaddr, EROFS_KMAP);
 		if (IS_ERR(it->kaddr))
 			return PTR_ERR(it->kaddr);
 
-		ret = xattr_foreach(it, &list_xattr_handlers, NULL);
-		if (ret)
+		ret = xattr_foreach(it, op, NULL);
+		if ((getxattr && ret != -ENOATTR) || (!getxattr && ret))
 			break;
 	}
-	return ret ? ret : it->buffer_ofs;
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int erofs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, int index,
+		   const char *name,
+		   void *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct erofs_xattr_iter it;
+
+	if (!name)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = erofs_init_inode_xattrs(inode);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	it.index = index;
+	it.name = (struct qstr)QSTR_INIT(name, strlen(name));
+	if (it.name.len > EROFS_NAME_LEN)
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	it.sb = inode->i_sb;
+	it.buf = __EROFS_BUF_INITIALIZER;
+	erofs_init_metabuf(&it.buf, it.sb);
+	it.buffer = buffer;
+	it.buffer_size = buffer_size;
+	it.buffer_ofs = 0;
+
+	ret = erofs_iter_inline_xattr(&it, inode, true);
+	if (ret == -ENOATTR)
+		ret = erofs_iter_shared_xattr(&it, inode, true);
+	erofs_put_metabuf(&it.buf);
+	return ret ? ret : it.buffer_ofs;
 }
 
 ssize_t erofs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
@@ -588,8 +531,9 @@  ssize_t erofs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct erofs_xattr_iter it;
+	struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
 
-	ret = erofs_init_inode_xattrs(d_inode(dentry));
+	ret = erofs_init_inode_xattrs(inode);
 	if (ret == -ENOATTR)
 		return 0;
 	if (ret)
@@ -603,11 +547,13 @@  ssize_t erofs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
 	it.buffer_size = buffer_size;
 	it.buffer_ofs = 0;
 
-	ret = inline_listxattr(&it);
-	if (ret >= 0 || ret == -ENOATTR)
-		ret = shared_listxattr(&it);
+	ret = erofs_iter_inline_xattr(&it, inode, false);
+	if (!ret || ret == -ENOATTR)
+		ret = erofs_iter_shared_xattr(&it, inode, false);
+	if (ret == -ENOATTR)
+		ret = 0;
 	erofs_put_metabuf(&it.buf);
-	return ret;
+	return ret ? ret : it.buffer_ofs;
 }
 
 void erofs_xattr_prefixes_cleanup(struct super_block *sb)