[v9,4/5] ksm: consider KSM-placed zeropages when calculating KSM profit
Commit Message
From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
When use_zero_pages is enabled, the calculation of ksm profit is not
correct because ksm zero pages is not counted in. So update the
calculation of KSM profit including the documentation.
Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Xiaokai Ran <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
Documentation/admin-guide/mm/ksm.rst | 18 +++++++++++-------
mm/ksm.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Comments
On 24.05.23 07:58, Yang Yang wrote:
> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
>
> When use_zero_pages is enabled, the calculation of ksm profit is not
> correct because ksm zero pages is not counted in. So update the
> calculation of KSM profit including the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> Cc: Xiaokai Ran <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> Cc: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
> Cc: Jiang Xuexin <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn>
> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
@@ -203,21 +203,25 @@ several times, which are unprofitable memory consumed.
1) How to determine whether KSM save memory or consume memory in system-wide
range? Here is a simple approximate calculation for reference::
- general_profit =~ pages_sharing * sizeof(page) - (all_rmap_items) *
+ general_profit =~ ksm_saved_pages * sizeof(page) - (all_rmap_items) *
sizeof(rmap_item);
- where all_rmap_items can be easily obtained by summing ``pages_sharing``,
- ``pages_shared``, ``pages_unshared`` and ``pages_volatile``.
+ where ksm_saved_pages equals to the sum of ``pages_sharing`` +
+ ``ksm_zero_pages`` of the system, and all_rmap_items can be easily
+ obtained by summing ``pages_sharing``, ``pages_shared``, ``pages_unshared``
+ and ``pages_volatile``.
2) The KSM profit inner a single process can be similarly obtained by the
following approximate calculation::
- process_profit =~ ksm_merging_pages * sizeof(page) -
+ process_profit =~ ksm_saved_pages * sizeof(page) -
ksm_rmap_items * sizeof(rmap_item).
- where ksm_merging_pages is shown under the directory ``/proc/<pid>/``,
- and ksm_rmap_items is shown in ``/proc/<pid>/ksm_stat``. The process profit
- is also shown in ``/proc/<pid>/ksm_stat`` as ksm_process_profit.
+ where ksm_saved_pages equals to the sum of ``ksm_merging_pages`` and
+ ``ksm_zero_pages``, both of which are shown under the directory
+ ``/proc/<pid>/ksm_stat``, and ksm_rmap_items is also shown in
+ ``/proc/<pid>/ksm_stat``. The process profit is also shown in
+ ``/proc/<pid>/ksm_stat`` as ksm_process_profit.
From the perspective of application, a high ratio of ``ksm_rmap_items`` to
``ksm_merging_pages`` means a bad madvise-applied policy, so developers or
@@ -3090,7 +3090,7 @@ static void wait_while_offlining(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
long ksm_process_profit(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- return mm->ksm_merging_pages * PAGE_SIZE -
+ return (long)(mm->ksm_merging_pages + mm->ksm_zero_pages) * PAGE_SIZE -
mm->ksm_rmap_items * sizeof(struct ksm_rmap_item);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
@@ -3371,7 +3371,7 @@ static ssize_t general_profit_show(struct kobject *kobj,
{
long general_profit;
- general_profit = ksm_pages_sharing * PAGE_SIZE -
+ general_profit = (ksm_pages_sharing + ksm_zero_pages) * PAGE_SIZE -
ksm_rmap_items * sizeof(struct ksm_rmap_item);
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%ld\n", general_profit);