[RFC,v3,04/17] vsock/virtio: non-linear skb handling for tap
Commit Message
For tap device new skb is created and data from the current skb is
copied to it. This adds copying data from non-linear skb to new
the skb.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Comments
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:39:37AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> For tap device new skb is created and data from the current skb is
> copied to it. This adds copying data from non-linear skb to new
> the skb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 16effa8d55d2..9854f48a0544 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,27 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + void *dst,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + struct iov_iter iov_iter = { 0 };
> + struct iovec iovec;
> + size_t to_copy;
> +
> + iovec.iov_base = dst;
Hi Arseniy,
Sparse seems unhappy about this.
Though, TBH, I'm unsure what should be done about it.
.../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
.../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: expected void [noderef] __user *iov_base
.../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: got void *dst
...
On 22.05.2023 16:13, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:39:37AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> For tap device new skb is created and data from the current skb is
>> copied to it. This adds copying data from non-linear skb to new
>> the skb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> index 16effa8d55d2..9854f48a0544 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>> @@ -106,6 +106,27 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + void *dst,
>> + size_t len)
>> +{
>> + struct iov_iter iov_iter = { 0 };
>> + struct iovec iovec;
>> + size_t to_copy;
>> +
>> + iovec.iov_base = dst;
>
> Hi Arseniy,
>
> Sparse seems unhappy about this.
> Though, TBH, I'm unsure what should be done about it.
>
> .../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
> .../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: expected void [noderef] __user *iov_base
> .../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: got void *dst
>
Got it, i'll check how to resolve this problem!
Thanks!
>
> ...
@@ -106,6 +106,27 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
return NULL;
}
+static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
+ void *dst,
+ size_t len)
+{
+ struct iov_iter iov_iter = { 0 };
+ struct iovec iovec;
+ size_t to_copy;
+
+ iovec.iov_base = dst;
+ iovec.iov_len = len;
+
+ iov_iter.iter_type = ITER_IOVEC;
+ iov_iter.__iov = &iovec;
+ iov_iter.nr_segs = 1;
+
+ to_copy = min_t(size_t, len, skb->len);
+
+ skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->frag_off,
+ &iov_iter, to_copy);
+}
+
/* Packet capture */
static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_build_skb(void *opaque)
{
@@ -114,7 +135,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_build_skb(void *opaque)
struct af_vsockmon_hdr *hdr;
struct sk_buff *skb;
size_t payload_len;
- void *payload_buf;
/* A packet could be split to fit the RX buffer, so we can retrieve
* the payload length from the header and the buffer pointer taking
@@ -122,7 +142,6 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_build_skb(void *opaque)
*/
pkt_hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(pkt);
payload_len = pkt->len;
- payload_buf = pkt->data;
skb = alloc_skb(sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*pkt_hdr) + payload_len,
GFP_ATOMIC);
@@ -165,7 +184,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *virtio_transport_build_skb(void *opaque)
skb_put_data(skb, pkt_hdr, sizeof(*pkt_hdr));
if (payload_len) {
- skb_put_data(skb, payload_buf, payload_len);
+ if (skb_is_nonlinear(pkt)) {
+ void *data = skb_put(skb, payload_len);
+
+ virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(pkt, data, payload_len);
+ } else {
+ skb_put_data(skb, pkt->data, payload_len);
+ }
}
return skb;