decompressor: provide missing prototypes
Commit Message
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The entry points for the decompressor don't always have a prototype
included in the .c file:
lib/decompress_inflate.c:42:17: error: no previous prototype for '__gunzip' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
lib/decompress_unxz.c:251:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unxz' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
lib/decompress_unzstd.c:331:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unzstd' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
include the correct headers for unxz and unzstd, and mark the
inflate function above as unconditionally 'static' to avoid
these warnings.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/decompress_inflate.c | 2 +-
lib/decompress_unxz.c | 2 ++
lib/decompress_unzstd.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comments
On Wed, 17 May 2023 15:19:31 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> The entry points for the decompressor don't always have a prototype
> included in the .c file:
>
> lib/decompress_inflate.c:42:17: error: no previous prototype for '__gunzip' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> lib/decompress_unxz.c:251:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unxz' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
> lib/decompress_unzstd.c:331:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unzstd' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>
> include the correct headers for unxz and unzstd, and mark the
> inflate function above as unconditionally 'static' to avoid
> these warnings.
These are errors, not warnings?
Under what circumstances do they occur?
Shouldn't we cc:stable? If so, do we have a suitable Fixes: target?
On Wed, May 17, 2023, at 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2023 15:19:31 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>
>> The entry points for the decompressor don't always have a prototype
>> included in the .c file:
>>
>> lib/decompress_inflate.c:42:17: error: no previous prototype for '__gunzip' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>> lib/decompress_unxz.c:251:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unxz' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>> lib/decompress_unzstd.c:331:17: error: no previous prototype for 'unzstd' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>>
>> include the correct headers for unxz and unzstd, and mark the
>> inflate function above as unconditionally 'static' to avoid
>> these warnings.
>
> These are errors, not warnings?
>
> Under what circumstances do they occur?
Running "make W=1" turns these errors on as warnings, enabling
CONFIG_WERROR turns all warnings into errors.
> Shouldn't we cc:stable? If so, do we have a suitable Fixes: target?
I have sent 140 patches for these, there is probably no point in backporting
them all. My hope is that we can enable -Wmissing-prototypes by default
after these are all merged, but that patch would not get backported
either.
I meant to include a link with the explanations to
https://people.kernel.org/arnd/missing-prototype-warnings-in-the-kernel
in my series but didn't have that in the separate patches.
Arnd
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ static long INIT nofill(void *buffer, unsigned long len)
}
/* Included from initramfs et al code */
-STATIC int INIT __gunzip(unsigned char *buf, long len,
+static int INIT __gunzip(unsigned char *buf, long len,
long (*fill)(void*, unsigned long),
long (*flush)(void*, unsigned long),
unsigned char *out_buf, long out_len,
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@
*/
#ifdef STATIC
# define XZ_PREBOOT
+#else
+#include <linux/decompress/unxz.h>
#endif
#ifdef __KERNEL__
# include <linux/decompress/mm.h>
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@
# define UNZSTD_PREBOOT
# include "xxhash.c"
# include "zstd/decompress_sources.h"
+#else
+#include <linux/decompress/unzstd.h>
#endif
#include <linux/decompress/mm.h>