Message ID | 20230515131757.60035-7-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:b0ea:0:b0:3b6:4342:cba0 with SMTP id b10csp6926937vqo; Mon, 15 May 2023 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4f/ZyelNodjAlurzemvZ0WFDgKre1WrzFfm2MyBV2cPxmjwV3JxM6CsGBDKZ2JUcIARLKN X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2305:b0:247:6022:9595 with SMTP id mt5-20020a17090b230500b0024760229595mr33958400pjb.45.1684157828023; Mon, 15 May 2023 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684157828; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=05ms4WcjnYMDSWlJUuZSpkaK/N4uDapJRRzDQxXYnJ7T6OOfs/44rdwmyuEO/KZ+dI W1i4j1guwTidI40UwWiM+JCdH/KbXftbdEl3g0JUL31B0xDBjXz2PfkhOQ9N3fnXX/f/ ROeRNdmojI0vAWUSnAtF7WNm1MKfq/BvyYNfqfcafhWzAs2X2rR1W4TkQl+Y2c02Qinz cL2iBal/w40+AvmN/wAtC2PAVbPnOLy6SQ0wEY9M6ybpcCPbAoIRvmfgRDyKriiCjUd3 YMhnTVmSXJs8cSbflpeGcZoFtqlxHvHN+WVnVpQJW02oR/SqOYDRpqQ+ochintATkp5T 4lSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=lo1IIZfKjDP5LNi0dc+D12owX90CR8s5tkIi0vNkd7U=; b=AG2aNm4IH6EQ9bDzDBrCetXDfuoDB461q+cWu8m7SgqL64f7Rooshu3NSbS4XgSm5E cYMVfNGcsoV3gq+dzBLIoPz09JI4JFWmE5YY5bLBiwsGeMhXfit6u1+JGvM1P5OKOGoQ eVtAqk/05cZ40Eol45IeVGsotalubbcYNsIRL4twSF2uuKorloAHdTyVMFwHnkdNusIf qbcrH+U5uWcfqU+5a1qQNsUsQvdt3SqNlekFuQwGUfhBv9usdUB/h7ABaojubFR3r8zL zy4zI0aGgCUd2ja+zo5qJuvDMYFytNRCxN/QUDKOD4rJwwry0oEI05wpshzMBoqiDQtt OKVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bytedance.com header.s=google header.b=iRq9sScO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=bytedance.com Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 29-20020a17090a035d00b0024e341eddabsi26919896pjf.53.2023.05.15.06.36.55; Mon, 15 May 2023 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@bytedance.com header.s=google header.b=iRq9sScO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=bytedance.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242130AbjEONT7 (ORCPT <rfc822;peekingduck44@gmail.com> + 99 others); Mon, 15 May 2023 09:19:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37374 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242098AbjEONTX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 15 May 2023 09:19:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF9419A6 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 15 May 2023 06:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5208be24dcbso9137603a12.1 for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 15 May 2023 06:18:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1684156722; x=1686748722; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lo1IIZfKjDP5LNi0dc+D12owX90CR8s5tkIi0vNkd7U=; b=iRq9sScOWZTCRfloTGbziN9cAC64a11zOsNkjp+5c1soI+3pRGWoucKuYa0+afBrM9 KP8InFDQgvCjKmHotLh2wYIyXRzWHtTPq+Eu/2q4uz7EHQaV09LS/cg0LBz50XCOSenv 5TIATnqEPFgNUuV8mtQuISYyzUH0xhNubca3DObs4XwCQmcEhgMKj6lZoQBSaPM42/p3 ZPnakXFKNosi63bdx6zJYoyHGjOpg2rxmoG3YBjH17UsScQn6r/yNgXEZSpXMSaiPPvO sVodHaxkosK0wFyiC0Hn2X0gh8Q5Iww84zRZZ4k5Aa2XQix6BKn1naSGI7OW3PhFCTqn VtCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684156722; x=1686748722; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lo1IIZfKjDP5LNi0dc+D12owX90CR8s5tkIi0vNkd7U=; b=YQpevQl3CrWyhZqUs/Cqo5sOMj1fDC0nuGdLKCJNbOOfX7DcND+7YtaVFXspvEdZ+B ILDHR7lRBwp3E65yUh05HZA8WbF607jvWhGvEpETth2AtxV78SOHavPOXC62d7CQDBI2 0RoEF37ZGb0cB67SxOlQwf3g2NGiuUS7+29Wn1LY+68kSpiDjEKWEPHXOgbASAAFTnrr F8xdPrLWsXoZyc/aQ7ttot8k8zn+PCGVd1MmRTxXkEv0WzqvDnnoAScNvZbb2IgnVkT7 3LyNaYxXv+wtk5rGTI2BP14BAMeDB1xP7CrFcz4p7nSRMCiayWG1oarK9UwYx0mNAw+Q 8j/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzINvCkH4VGeSYxYsJ2WbppwWeGG9rrJsG6igl8rEtP3/lqwGe4 N969vAr75tFAW0fCSwV5iuEUrg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:46cd:b0:250:6119:6c1f with SMTP id jx13-20020a17090b46cd00b0025061196c1fmr27787639pjb.19.1684156721988; Mon, 15 May 2023 06:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GL4FX4PXWL.bytedance.net ([139.177.225.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gl20-20020a17090b121400b0024749e7321bsm14190014pjb.6.2023.05.15.06.18.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 May 2023 06:18:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> To: Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org, Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> Subject: [PATCH 06/10] maple_tree: Wrap the replace operation with an inline function. Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 21:17:53 +0800 Message-Id: <20230515131757.60035-7-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.0 (Apple Git-136) In-Reply-To: <20230515131757.60035-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> References: <20230515131757.60035-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1765967478463472024?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1765967478463472024?= |
Series |
Clean ups for maple tree
|
|
Commit Message
Peng Zhang
May 15, 2023, 1:17 p.m. UTC
To make mas_wr_modify() cleaner, wrap the replace operation with an
inline function.
Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com>
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Comments
* Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> [230515 09:18]: > To make mas_wr_modify() cleaner, wrap the replace operation with an > inline function. mas_wr_modify() is already pretty small. Is there any reason you want this in its own function besides it looking cleaner? > > Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> > --- > lib/maple_tree.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c > index 4c649d75a4923..ce695adc670ec 100644 > --- a/lib/maple_tree.c > +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c > @@ -4288,6 +4288,19 @@ static inline void mas_wr_extend_null(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > } > } > > +static inline bool mas_wr_replace(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > +{ > + struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; > + > + if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { > + rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); > + if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) > + mas_update_gap(mas); > + return true; > + } > + return false; > +} > + > static inline bool mas_wr_append(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > { > unsigned char end = wr_mas->node_end; > @@ -4347,13 +4360,9 @@ static inline void mas_wr_modify(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > unsigned char node_size; > struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; > > - /* Direct replacement */ > - if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { > - rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); > - if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) > - mas_update_gap(mas); > + /* Attempt to direct replace */ > + if (mas_wr_replace(wr_mas)) > return; > - } > > /* Attempt to append */ > node_slots = mt_slots[wr_mas->type]; > -- > 2.20.1 >
在 2023/5/16 01:07, Liam R. Howlett 写道: > * Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> [230515 09:18]: >> To make mas_wr_modify() cleaner, wrap the replace operation with an >> inline function. > > mas_wr_modify() is already pretty small. Is there any reason you want > this in its own function besides it looking cleaner? I just want to make the four fast paths in mas_wr_modify() look uniform without any functional effect. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> >> --- >> lib/maple_tree.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c >> index 4c649d75a4923..ce695adc670ec 100644 >> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c >> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c >> @@ -4288,6 +4288,19 @@ static inline void mas_wr_extend_null(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >> } >> } >> >> +static inline bool mas_wr_replace(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >> +{ >> + struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; >> + >> + if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { >> + rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); >> + if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) >> + mas_update_gap(mas); >> + return true; >> + } >> + return false; >> +} >> + >> static inline bool mas_wr_append(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >> { >> unsigned char end = wr_mas->node_end; >> @@ -4347,13 +4360,9 @@ static inline void mas_wr_modify(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >> unsigned char node_size; >> struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; >> >> - /* Direct replacement */ >> - if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { >> - rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); >> - if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) >> - mas_update_gap(mas); >> + /* Attempt to direct replace */ >> + if (mas_wr_replace(wr_mas)) >> return; >> - } >> >> /* Attempt to append */ >> node_slots = mt_slots[wr_mas->type]; >> -- >> 2.20.1 >>
* Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> [230515 20:46]: > > > 在 2023/5/16 01:07, Liam R. Howlett 写道: > > * Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> [230515 09:18]: > > > To make mas_wr_modify() cleaner, wrap the replace operation with an > > > inline function. > > > > mas_wr_modify() is already pretty small. Is there any reason you want > > this in its own function besides it looking cleaner? > I just want to make the four fast paths in mas_wr_modify() > look uniform without any functional effect. I'd like to keep it the way it is. I think the comment stating what is going on is clear enough and mas_wr_modify() isn't too big. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> > > > --- > > > lib/maple_tree.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c > > > index 4c649d75a4923..ce695adc670ec 100644 > > > --- a/lib/maple_tree.c > > > +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c > > > @@ -4288,6 +4288,19 @@ static inline void mas_wr_extend_null(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > > > } > > > } > > > +static inline bool mas_wr_replace(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > > > +{ > > > + struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; > > > + > > > + if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { > > > + rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); > > > + if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) > > > + mas_update_gap(mas); > > > + return true; > > > + } > > > + return false; > > > +} > > > + > > > static inline bool mas_wr_append(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > > > { > > > unsigned char end = wr_mas->node_end; > > > @@ -4347,13 +4360,9 @@ static inline void mas_wr_modify(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) > > > unsigned char node_size; > > > struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; > > > - /* Direct replacement */ > > > - if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { > > > - rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); > > > - if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) > > > - mas_update_gap(mas); > > > + /* Attempt to direct replace */ > > > + if (mas_wr_replace(wr_mas)) > > > return; > > > - } > > > /* Attempt to append */ > > > node_slots = mt_slots[wr_mas->type]; > > > -- > > > 2.20.1 > > >
在 2023/5/16 22:16, Liam R. Howlett 写道: > * Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> [230515 20:46]: >> >> >> 在 2023/5/16 01:07, Liam R. Howlett 写道: >>> * Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> [230515 09:18]: >>>> To make mas_wr_modify() cleaner, wrap the replace operation with an >>>> inline function. >>> >>> mas_wr_modify() is already pretty small. Is there any reason you want >>> this in its own function besides it looking cleaner? >> I just want to make the four fast paths in mas_wr_modify() >> look uniform without any functional effect. > > I'd like to keep it the way it is. I think the comment stating what is > going on is clear enough and mas_wr_modify() isn't too big. Ok, I'll drop this patch in v3. > >>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com> >>>> --- >>>> lib/maple_tree.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ >>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c >>>> index 4c649d75a4923..ce695adc670ec 100644 >>>> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c >>>> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c >>>> @@ -4288,6 +4288,19 @@ static inline void mas_wr_extend_null(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >>>> } >>>> } >>>> +static inline bool mas_wr_replace(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; >>>> + >>>> + if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { >>>> + rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); >>>> + if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) >>>> + mas_update_gap(mas); >>>> + return true; >>>> + } >>>> + return false; >>>> +} >>>> + >>>> static inline bool mas_wr_append(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >>>> { >>>> unsigned char end = wr_mas->node_end; >>>> @@ -4347,13 +4360,9 @@ static inline void mas_wr_modify(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) >>>> unsigned char node_size; >>>> struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; >>>> - /* Direct replacement */ >>>> - if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { >>>> - rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); >>>> - if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) >>>> - mas_update_gap(mas); >>>> + /* Attempt to direct replace */ >>>> + if (mas_wr_replace(wr_mas)) >>>> return; >>>> - } >>>> /* Attempt to append */ >>>> node_slots = mt_slots[wr_mas->type]; >>>> -- >>>> 2.20.1 >>>>
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c index 4c649d75a4923..ce695adc670ec 100644 --- a/lib/maple_tree.c +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c @@ -4288,6 +4288,19 @@ static inline void mas_wr_extend_null(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) } } +static inline bool mas_wr_replace(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) +{ + struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; + + if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { + rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); + if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) + mas_update_gap(mas); + return true; + } + return false; +} + static inline bool mas_wr_append(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) { unsigned char end = wr_mas->node_end; @@ -4347,13 +4360,9 @@ static inline void mas_wr_modify(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas) unsigned char node_size; struct ma_state *mas = wr_mas->mas; - /* Direct replacement */ - if (wr_mas->r_min == mas->index && wr_mas->r_max == mas->last) { - rcu_assign_pointer(wr_mas->slots[mas->offset], wr_mas->entry); - if (!!wr_mas->entry ^ !!wr_mas->content) - mas_update_gap(mas); + /* Attempt to direct replace */ + if (mas_wr_replace(wr_mas)) return; - } /* Attempt to append */ node_slots = mt_slots[wr_mas->type];