diff mbox series

[v6,01/21] tick-sched: Warn when next tick seems to be in the past

Message ID 20230510072817.116056-2-anna-maria@linutronix.de
State New
Headers
Series timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model |

Commit Message

Anna-Maria Behnsen May 10, 2023, 7:27 a.m. UTC 
  When the next tick is in the past, the delta between basemono and the next
tick gets negativ. But the next tick should never be in the past. The
negative effect of a wrong next tick might be a stop of the tick and timers
might expire late.

To prevent expensive debugging when changing underlying code, add a
WARN_ON_ONCE into this code path.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 52254679ec48..62836490ba4d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -831,6 +831,8 @@  static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
 	 * If the tick is due in the next period, keep it ticking or
 	 * force prod the timer.
 	 */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(basemono > next_tick);
+
 	delta = next_tick - basemono;
 	if (delta <= (u64)TICK_NSEC) {
 		/*