[1/2] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Fix missing adreno_smmu's

  From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

When the special handling of qcom,adreno-smmu was moved into
qcom_smmu_create(), it was overlooked that we didn't have all the
required entries in qcom_smmu_impl_of_match.  So we stopped getting
adreno_smmu_priv on sc7180, breaking per-process pgtables.

Fixes: 30b912a03d91 ("iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create")
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
  

On 2.05.2023 18:09, Rob Clark wrote:
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> 
> When the special handling of qcom,adreno-smmu was moved into
> qcom_smmu_create(), it was overlooked that we didn't have all the
> required entries in qcom_smmu_impl_of_match.  So we stopped getting
> adreno_smmu_priv on sc7180, breaking per-process pgtables.
> 
> Fixes: 30b912a03d91 ("iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create")
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> ---
I believe the issue here is the lack of qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 instead.

qcom,adreno-smmu does not have to imply the "qcom smmu v2" impl

Konrad
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index d1b296b95c86..88c89424485b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -512,20 +512,25 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6115-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data},
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> +	/*
> +	 * Should come after the qcom,smmu-500 fallback so smmu-500 variants of
> +	 * adreno-smmu get qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl:
> +	 */
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,adreno-smmu", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  static struct acpi_platform_list qcom_acpi_platlist[] = {
>  	{ "LENOVO", "CB-01   ", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
>  	{ "QCOM  ", "QCOMEDK2", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
>  	{ }
>  };
>  #endif
  

On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:41 AM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2.05.2023 18:09, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> >
> > When the special handling of qcom,adreno-smmu was moved into
> > qcom_smmu_create(), it was overlooked that we didn't have all the
> > required entries in qcom_smmu_impl_of_match.  So we stopped getting
> > adreno_smmu_priv on sc7180, breaking per-process pgtables.
> >
> > Fixes: 30b912a03d91 ("iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create")
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> > ---
> I believe the issue here is the lack of qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 instead.
>
> qcom,adreno-smmu does not have to imply the "qcom smmu v2" impl

Yes, but the ordering after "qcom,smmu-500" does.  Currently we just
need the one missing "qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2" but that seemed kind of
fragile to me, which is why I went with "qcom,adreno-smmu" as a
catch-all

BR,
-R

>
> Konrad
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > index d1b296b95c86..88c89424485b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> > @@ -512,20 +512,25 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm6115-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data},
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
> > +     /*
> > +      * Should come after the qcom,smmu-500 fallback so smmu-500 variants of
> > +      * adreno-smmu get qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl:
> > +      */
> > +     { .compatible = "qcom,adreno-smmu", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
> >       { }
> >  };
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> >  static struct acpi_platform_list qcom_acpi_platlist[] = {
> >       { "LENOVO", "CB-01   ", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
> >       { "QCOM  ", "QCOMEDK2", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
> >       { }
> >  };
> >  #endif
  

On 04/05/2023 21:08, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:41 AM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2.05.2023 18:09, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>>>
>>> When the special handling of qcom,adreno-smmu was moved into
>>> qcom_smmu_create(), it was overlooked that we didn't have all the
>>> required entries in qcom_smmu_impl_of_match.  So we stopped getting
>>> adreno_smmu_priv on sc7180, breaking per-process pgtables.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 30b912a03d91 ("iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Move the qcom,adreno-smmu check into qcom_smmu_create")
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>> I believe the issue here is the lack of qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2 instead.
>>
>> qcom,adreno-smmu does not have to imply the "qcom smmu v2" impl
> 
> Yes, but the ordering after "qcom,smmu-500" does.  Currently we just
> need the one missing "qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2" but that seemed kind of
> fragile to me, which is why I went with "qcom,adreno-smmu" as a
> catch-all

I think, the order is not relevant when comparing compatible entries, 
see __of_match_node(). It uses scoring and the more specific compatible 
wins. This way, "qcom,adreno-smmu", "qcom,smmu-500" will always end up 
with the v2 ops instead smmu500. It was not included into the list 
intentionally, rather than being by omission.

Thus I'd also suggest adding "qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2" to the list, as we 
currently do for all SMMU_v2 devices.

> 
> BR,
> -R
> 
>>
>> Konrad
>>>   drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 5 +++++
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> index d1b296b95c86..88c89424485b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>>> @@ -512,20 +512,25 @@ static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm6115-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data},
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm6350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm6375-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>>        { .compatible = "qcom,smmu-500", .data = &qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data },
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * Should come after the qcom,smmu-500 fallback so smmu-500 variants of
>>> +      * adreno-smmu get qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl:
>>> +      */
>>> +     { .compatible = "qcom,adreno-smmu", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
>>>        { }
>>>   };
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>>   static struct acpi_platform_list qcom_acpi_platlist[] = {
>>>        { "LENOVO", "CB-01   ", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
>>>        { "QCOM  ", "QCOMEDK2", 0x8180, ACPI_SIG_IORT, equal, "QCOM SMMU" },
>>>        { }
>>>   };
>>>   #endif