[10/17] iommu/vt-d: Remove PASID supervisor request support
Commit Message
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
There's no more usage, remove PASID supervisor support.
Suggested-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230331231137.1947675-3-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.h | 7 ------
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 43 -------------------------------------
2 files changed, 50 deletions(-)
@@ -41,13 +41,6 @@
#define FLPT_DEFAULT_DID 1
#define NUM_RESERVED_DID 2
-/*
- * The SUPERVISOR_MODE flag indicates a first level translation which
- * can be used for access to kernel addresses. It is valid only for
- * access to the kernel's static 1:1 mapping of physical memory — not
- * to vmalloc or even module mappings.
- */
-#define PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE BIT(0)
#define PASID_FLAG_NESTED BIT(1)
#define PASID_FLAG_PAGE_SNOOP BIT(2)
@@ -335,15 +335,6 @@ static inline void pasid_set_fault_enable(struct pasid_entry *pe)
pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[0], 1 << 1, 0);
}
-/*
- * Setup the SRE(Supervisor Request Enable) field (Bit 128) of a
- * scalable mode PASID entry.
- */
-static inline void pasid_set_sre(struct pasid_entry *pe)
-{
- pasid_set_bits(&pe->val[2], 1 << 0, 1);
-}
-
/*
* Setup the WPE(Write Protect Enable) field (Bit 132) of a
* scalable mode PASID entry.
@@ -521,23 +512,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (flags & PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86
- unsigned long cr0 = read_cr0();
-
- /* CR0.WP is normally set but just to be sure */
- if (unlikely(!(cr0 & X86_CR0_WP))) {
- pr_err("No CPU write protect!\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-#endif
- if (!ecap_srs(iommu->ecap)) {
- pr_err("No supervisor request support on %s\n",
- iommu->name);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- }
-
if ((flags & PASID_FLAG_FL5LP) && !cap_fl5lp_support(iommu->cap)) {
pr_err("No 5-level paging support for first-level on %s\n",
iommu->name);
@@ -560,10 +534,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_first_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
/* Setup the first level page table pointer: */
pasid_set_flptr(pte, (u64)__pa(pgd));
- if (flags & PASID_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE) {
- pasid_set_sre(pte);
- pasid_set_wpe(pte);
- }
if (flags & PASID_FLAG_FL5LP)
pasid_set_flpm(pte, 1);
@@ -658,12 +628,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_second_level(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
- /*
- * Since it is a second level only translation setup, we should
- * set SRE bit as well (addresses are expected to be GPAs).
- */
- if (pasid != PASID_RID2PASID && ecap_srs(iommu->ecap))
- pasid_set_sre(pte);
pasid_set_present(pte);
spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
@@ -700,13 +664,6 @@ int intel_pasid_setup_pass_through(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
pasid_set_translation_type(pte, PASID_ENTRY_PGTT_PT);
pasid_set_fault_enable(pte);
pasid_set_page_snoop(pte, !!ecap_smpwc(iommu->ecap));
-
- /*
- * We should set SRE bit as well since the addresses are expected
- * to be GPAs.
- */
- if (ecap_srs(iommu->ecap))
- pasid_set_sre(pte);
pasid_set_present(pte);
spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);