rcu/kvfree: Invoke debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue() with check bnode->snap is done

Message ID 20230405021359.606321-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com
State New
Headers
Series rcu/kvfree: Invoke debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue() with check bnode->snap is done |

Commit Message

Zqiang April 5, 2023, 2:13 a.m. UTC
  This commit make debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue() be invoked with check
the bnode structure's->snap is done in kvfree_rcu_bulk().

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Uladzislau Rezki April 5, 2023, 2:45 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 10:13:59AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> This commit make debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue() be invoked with check
> the bnode structure's->snap is done in kvfree_rcu_bulk().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 3461fc2640b9..17b5d115aec1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -2943,8 +2943,8 @@ kvfree_rcu_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue(bnode);
>  	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&bnode->gp_snap))) {
> +		debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue(bnode);
>  		rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
>  		if (idx == 0) { // kmalloc() / kfree().
>  			trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_bulk_callback(
> -- 
> 2.32.0
>
Since we leak, looks like correct to me:

Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

--
Uladzislau Rezki
  
Paul E. McKenney April 5, 2023, 7:04 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 04:45:27PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 10:13:59AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > This commit make debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue() be invoked with check
> > the bnode structure's->snap is done in kvfree_rcu_bulk().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 3461fc2640b9..17b5d115aec1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -2943,8 +2943,8 @@ kvfree_rcu_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > -	debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue(bnode);
> >  	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&bnode->gp_snap))) {
> > +		debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue(bnode);
> >  		rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
> >  		if (idx == 0) { // kmalloc() / kfree().
> >  			trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_bulk_callback(
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0
> >
> Since we leak, looks like correct to me:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>

Queued for v6.5, thank you both!

							Thanx, Paul
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3461fc2640b9..17b5d115aec1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2943,8 +2943,8 @@  kvfree_rcu_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
-	debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue(bnode);
 	if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_rcu_full(&bnode->gp_snap))) {
+		debug_rcu_bhead_unqueue(bnode);
 		rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
 		if (idx == 0) { // kmalloc() / kfree().
 			trace_rcu_invoke_kfree_bulk_callback(